Skip to main content

Prediction of Personality Traits in Facebook Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Data Science and Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 86))

Abstract

Social media is a forum for people to introduce themselves to the world, sharing personal details, and perspectives about their lives. This awareness can be used to improve app performance and application experiences. Personality has been shown to be important to many kinds of interactions; it has been shown to be beneficial for predicting job satisfaction, efficiency, and even preference for specific interfaces. Various information is widely shared through social media, i.e., Facebook and Twitter. User and user data are important research instruments in the fields of behavioral learning and personality via status updates. There is a rapid increase in use of social networks. Similar research has been carried out in this area and continues to grow. This attempts to create a program that can predict a person’s character using a dataset. Its research is conducted in the Big Five Model Personality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prantik H, Kuntal KP, Alfredo C, Madhu Kumar SD (2018) Predicting Facebook-user’s personality based on status and linguistic features via flexible regression analysis techniques. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC ‘18). Association for computing machinery. New York, NY, USA, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132

  2. Barbier G., Liu H (2011) Data mining in social media. In: Aggarwal C (ed) Social network data analytics. Springer, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Golbeck J, Robles C, Edmondson M, Turner K (2011). Predicting personality from Twitter, 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.33

  4. Golbeck J, Robles C, Turner K (2011) Predicting personality with social media. Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst Proc 253–262:0001. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Han J, Kamber M (2011) Data mining: concepts and techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Agarwal A, Xie B, Vovsha I, Rambow O, Passonneau R (2011) Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In: Proceedings of the workshop on languages in social media, 30–38

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cambria E, Schuller B, Xia Y, Havasi C (2013) New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Intell Syst IEEE 28:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2013.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Golnoosh F, Geetha S, Shanu S, Fabio C, Michal K, David S, Sergio D, Marie-Francine M, Martine De Cock (2016) Computational personality recognition in social media. User Modeling User-Adapted Interaction 26(2–3):109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abel F, Gao Q, Houben GJ, Tao K (2011) Semantic enrichment of twitter posts for user profile construction on the social web. In: Antoniou G et al. (eds) The semanic web: research and applications. ESWC 2011. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6644. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kosinski M, Matz S, Gosling S, Popov V, Stillwell D (2015) Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. Am Psychol 70(6):543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Earle P, Bowden D, Guy M (2012) Twitter earthquake detection: earthquake monitoring in a social world. Ann Geophys Annali di geofisica. 54:0001. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-5364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapelle O, Scholkopf B, Zien A (eds) (2006) Semi-supervised learning. MIT Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262033589.001.0001

  13. Pennebaker J, Boyd R, Jordan K, Blackburn K (2015) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moffitt K, Giboney J, Ehrhardt E, Burgoon J, Nunamaker J (2010) Structured programming for linguistic cue extraction [Online]. Available from: http://splice.cmi.arizona.edu/

  15. Pennebaker JW, King LA (1999) Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(6):1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. François M, Marilyn AW, Matthias RM, Roger KM (2007) Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. J Artif Int Res 30(1):457–500

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mairesse F, Walker M (2006) Automatic recognition of personality in conversation. Proc HLT-NAACL

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schler J, Koppel M, Argamon S, Pennebaker J (2006) Effects of age and gender on blogging. In: Computational approaches to analyzing weblogs—papers from the AAAI spring symposium, technical report. (AAAI spring symposium—technical report, vol. SS-06–03), pp 191–197

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heylighen F, Dewaele J (2002) Variation in the contextuality of language: an empirical measure. Found Sci 7:293–340. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019661126744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes DJ, Rowe M, Batey M, Lee A (2012) A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Comput Hum Behavior 28(2):561–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001

  21. Allport GW, Odbert HS (1936) Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study. Psychol Monogr 47(1):i–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cattell RB (1957) Personality and motivation structure and measurement. World Book Co

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gangemi A, Presutti V, Diego RR (2014) Frame-based detection of opinion holders and topics: a model and a tool Comput Intell Magz IEEE 9(20):30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2013.2291688

  24. https://sites.psu.edu/leadership/2016/03/29/big-five- relationships/

  25. Mamta B, Ashok Kumar K (2019) Personality Prediction from social networks text using machine learning. Int J Recent Technol Eng (IJRTE) 8(4). ISSN: 2277–3878

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dey N, Borah S, Babo R, Ashour AS (2019) Social network analytics: computational research methods and techniques, Elsevier. ISBN: 9780128156414

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mamta Bhamare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bhamare, M., Ashokkumar, K. (2022). Prediction of Personality Traits in Facebook Users. In: Borah, S., Mishra, S.K., Mishra, B.K., Balas, V.E., Polkowski, Z. (eds) Advances in Data Science and Management . Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 86. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5685-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics