Skip to main content

Optimal Design of Truss Structures with Natural Frequency Constraints Utilizing IWSA Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 240))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Constructing structures with the lowest possible use of the material has long been an interesting topic among engineers. In this regard, the resilience of structures in the face of natural hazards and their concomitant effects, such as the resonance phenomenon, should also be taken into account. Frequency-constrained optimization problems seek to not only construct structures with the least possible material amount, but also prevent the resonance phenomenon, enhancing the sustainability of the structures by reducing the total material consumption while minimizing the future damage cost incurred by structural components due to this effect. This article assesses the truss optimization problems with natural frequency constraints using the improved version of the newly developed meta-heuristic algorithm, referred to as the water strider algorithm (WSA). Improved water strider algorithm (IWSA) utilizes two mechanisms to improve the performance of WSA. The first one is the opposition-based learning (OBL) technique, and the other is a mutation method. The OBL technique for the initial population improves the convergence rate and the accuracy of the final result, and the mutation method helps it to approach the global optimum and avoid the local one. Three benchmark spatial truss optimization problems are selected from the literature to examine the efficiency of IWSA in comparison to other well-established algorithms as well as its standard version, WSA. The results reveal the viability and competitiveness of the IWSA algorithm in the framework of design optimization with frequency constraints in comparison to its standard version and other structural optimization algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carvalho JPG, Lemonge ACC, Carvalho ÉCR, Hallak PH, Bernardino HS (2018) Truss optimization with multiple frequency constraints and automatic member grouping. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(2):547–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1761-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M (2016) Optimal design of dome truss structures with dynamic frequency constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(3):605–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1357-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2018) Optimal design of cyclically symmetric trusses with frequency constraints using cyclical parthenogenesis algorithm. Adv Struct Eng 21(5):739–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217732492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieu QX, Do DTT, Lee J (2018) An adaptive hybrid evolutionary firefly algorithm for shape and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints. Comput Struct 195(January):99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaveh A, Dadras Eslamlou A (2020) Water strider algorithm: a new metaheuristic and applications. Structures 25(June):520–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.033

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaveh A, Ghazaan MI, Asadi A (2020) An improved water strider algorithm for optimal design of skeletal structures. Period Polytech Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.16872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. 1st MIT Press ed. Complex Adaptive Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gandomi AH, Alavi AH (2012) Krill herd: a new bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17(12):4831–4845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.05.010

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tizhoosh HR (2005) Opposition-based learning: a new scheme for machine intelligence. In: International conference on computational intelligence for modelling, control and automation and international conference on intelligent agents, web technologies and internet commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC’06), vol 1, pp 695–701. IEEE, Vienna, Austriahttps://doi.org/10.1109/CIMCA.2005.1631345

  10. Zhang Y, Jin Z (2020) Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization with generalized space transformation search. Soft Comput 24(19):14981–14997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04850-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lingyun W, Mei Z, Guangming W, Guang M (2005) Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on genetic algorithm. Comput Mech 35(5):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-004-0623-8

  12. Gomes HM (2011) Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 38(1):957–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2011) Shape and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints using enhanced charged system search algorithm. Asian J Civ Eng 12(4):487–509

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miguel LF, Fadel, and Leandro Fleck Fadel Miguel. (2012) Shape and size optimization of truss structures considering dynamic constraints through modern metaheuristic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 39(10):9458–9467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farshchin M, Camp CV, Maniat M (2016) Multi-class teaching–learning-based optimization for truss design with frequency constraints. Eng Struct 106(January):355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaveh A, Farhadmanesh M (2018) Optimal seismic design of steel plate shear walls using metaheuristic algorithms. Period Polytech Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.12119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2016) Optimal analysis and design of large-scale domes with frequency constraints. Smart Struct Syst 18(4):733–54. https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2016.18.4.733

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Farhadmanesh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Farhadmanesh, M., Asadi Abadi, A., Cheraghi, A. (2023). Optimal Design of Truss Structures with Natural Frequency Constraints Utilizing IWSA Algorithm. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 240. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0507-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0507-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0506-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0507-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics