Abstract
It is important to understand user’s approbation indicators for the performance evaluation necessary for the successful operation and sustenance of the public transport system. BLUE line of Delhi Metro has been examined to identify and evaluate the user’s approbation indicators. An on-board survey of metro commuters is conducted in December 2020. Some of the approbation indicators included in this paper are choice and captive ridership, access modes, access-egress time, main haul distance and time, interchange stations, metro fare, and comfort factors. The analysis of the data reveals that 57.9% of users are under 30 years and users above the age of 50 years do not prefer metro as primary PT mode. About 43.96% of the users are daily metro riders, whereas the 56.04% has different frequency of metro travel. The metro has 46.5% users as captive riders and remaining 53.5% owns at least one personal vehicle. It is noted that 50.8% of the users do not need parking facility and remaining 49.2% users have different opinions on the availability and affordability of parking facility. About 58.5% of user’s report limited to insufficient seating capacity in coach and concourse. Significant users are satisfied with information, signages, and security system provided by Delhi metro. It is revealed that 90% trips have interconnectivity ratio between 0.082 and 0.424 for all access-metro-egress mode combinations. It is also observed that average main haul distance of users is (19.69 ± 11.19) km. To understand the user’s approbation indicators and their inter-relationship, decision tree model is analysed and findings are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Singh B, Kumar D (2014) Customer satisfaction analysis on services of Delhi metro 1(5):124–131
Elangovan K, Kumar CB, Nallusamy S (2018) Study on effect of Chennai Metro Rail Limited routing system and its future growth. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev 8(1):1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdfeb2018128
DMRC (2016) DMRC sustainability report. Pap Knowl Towar a Media Hist Doc 12–26
CSE (2019) The cost of urban commute: balancing: affordability and sustainability of public transport, p 64
DMRC (2015) Sustainability in motion (DMRC operations and maintenance)
DMRC (2020) DMRC
Christian G (1984) A service quality model and its marketing implications 18(4)
Lehtinen JR (1991) Two approaches to service quality dimensions. Serv Ind J 11(3):287–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069100000047
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark 49(4):41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251430
Berry LL, Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64(1):12–40
Kyriakidis M, Hirsch R, Majumdar A (2012) Metro railway safety: an analysis of accident precursors. Saf Sci 50(7):1535–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.03.004
Wadhwa L (2000) Sustainable transport: key to sustainable cities 5–24
Bag S (2012) Kolkata metro railway and customer satisfaction: an empirical study 2(3)
Swami M, Parida M (2016) Diagnostic evaluation of multimodal urban transport system operation in Delhi. August
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics) 12343:503–515, LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62008-0_35
Golias I, Karlaftis MG (2001) An international comparative study of self-reported driver behavior. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 4(4):243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(01)00026-2
Xie C, Lu J, Parkany E (2012) Work travel mode choice modeling with data mining: decision trees and neural networks. Transp Res Rec 1854:50–61. https://doi.org/10.3141/1854-06
Goel R, Tiwari G (2016) Access-egress and other travel characteristics of metro users in Delhi and its satellite cities. IATSS Res 39(2):164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.10.001
Bhandari K, Kato H, Hayashi Y (2008) Mrts system in Delhi: increase in mode choice and its mobility and equity implications. Int J Urban Sci 12(2):158–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2008.9693638
Goel R, Tiwari G (2014) promoting low carbon transport in India
Chauhan V, Suman HK, Bolia NB (2016) Binary logistic model for estimation of mode shift into Delhi metro. Open Transp J 10(1):124–136. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801610010124
Thanai D, Chugh N (2017) Customer satisfaction towards Delhi Metro Rail Corporation. XVIII Annu Int Conf Proc 978:264–276. [Online]. Available: http://www.internationalseminar.org/XVIII_AIC/TS5A/Dishathanai_264-276_pdf
Ali J, Khan R, Ahmad N, Maqsood I (2012) Random forests and decision trees. Int J Comput Sci Issues 9(5):272–278
C. R. Sekhar, Minal, and E. Madhu, “Mode Choice Analysis Using Random Forrest Decision Trees,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 17, no. December 2014, pp. 644–652, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.119.
Krygsman S, Dijst M, Arentze T (2004) Multimodal public transport: An analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio. Transp Policy 11(3):265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.12.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khursheed, S., Kidwai, F.A. (2023). Evaluation of Users Approbation Indicators of Delhi Metro. In: Anjaneyulu, M.V.L.R., Harikrishna, M., Arkatkar, S.S., Veeraragavan, A. (eds) Recent Advances in Transportation Systems Engineering and Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 261. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2273-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2273-2_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2272-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2273-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)