Skip to main content

Visualization of Liquefaction in Soils with PWP Measurements by Tapping

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Earthquake Geotechnics

Abstract

While sandy silty soils, especially in the river delta area are subjected to liquefaction due to high-intensity earthquakes, the geotechnical profession has gone far and wide in the determination of liquefiable/non-liquefiable zone based on the semi-empirical methodology since the 1970s. Moreover, cyclic triaxial, as well as simple shear tests, on soils have been exploited sequentially to recreate pre- and post-liquefaction situations. There are few laboratory studies to capture the liquefaction effect in soils when subjected to dynamic excitations. In this paper, the effect of manual tapping on the small–medium–large containers filled with soil–water, both visualization of the liquefaction phenomena and measurement of excess PWP has been explained. Simulation of underground utilities and overground buildings in a liquefiable soil has been done with rubber balls affixed with a needle. Capturing the upward movement of the rubber balls and downward movement of the needle fixed rubber balls vis-à-vis instant jumping of water level in the open standpipe piezometer, are some of the unique experimental findings. The results show that out of nine types of soils specimen, the Yamuna River sand in Delhi and the Khowai River sand in Agartala, India, are highly liquefiable, and equivalent PWP variation during dynamic excitation has been measured and simulated during the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, S. K., & Chawla. J. (2006). Seismic hazard assessment for Delhi region. Current Science, 91, 1717–1724 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger, R. W., & Ziotopoulou, K. (2015). PM4Sand (Version 3): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Report No. UCD/CGM-15/01. Davis (CA): Center for Geotechnical Modeling, University of California; 2015, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W.-J., Rathje, E. M., Stokoe, K. H. II, & Hazirbaba, K. (2007). In Situ pore-pressure generation behavior of liquefiable sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(8), 921–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobry, R. (1995). Liquefaction and deformation of soils and foundations under seismic conditions, State-of-the-Art Paper. In S. Prakash (ed.), Proceedings, Third Intl. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. St. Louis, MO, April 2–7, 3, 1465–1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobry, R., & Abdown, T. (1988). Post-triggering response of liquefied sand in the free field and near foundations. Proceedings of the Conf. on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamcs III, Seattle, WA, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 75, Vol. I, pp. 270–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, R. N. (2000). Seismic status of Delhi megacity. Current Science, 78, 568–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, R. N., & Ghosh, S. (2004). Microzonation of earthquake hazard in greater Delhi area. Current Science, 87, 1193–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiaer, W. U., Kammerer, A. M., Riemer, M. F., Seed, R. B., & Pestana, J. M. (2004). Laboratory study of liquefaction triggering criteria. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, Paper No. 2580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, published by Dorling Kindersley [India] Pvt. Ltd. licensees of Pearson Education in South Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzari, M. T., El Ghoraiby, M., Kutter, B. L., Zeghal, M., ... & Ziotopoulou, K. (2018). Liquefaction experiment and analysis projects (LEAP): Summary of observations from the planning phase, 113(10), 714–743(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.015.

  • O’Rourke, T. D., Gowdy, T. E., Stewart, H. E., & Pease, J. W. (1991). Lifeline performance and ground deformation in the Marina During 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Proceedings of the 3rd Japan-U.S. Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction, San Francisco, California, NCEER Technical Report NCEER-91–0001, December 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, T. A. (1883). Catalogue of Indian earthquakes from the earliest times to the end of AD 1869. Memoirs Geological Society India, 19, 163–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlea, V. G., & Beaty, M. H. (2010). Corps of Engineers’ practice in the evaluation of seismic deformation of embankment dams. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. San Diego: Special Lecture SPL-6; May 24–29, 2010, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, S. K., Towhata, I., Chandradhara, G. P., & Nanjundaswamy, P. (2004). Shaking table tests in earthquake geotechnical engineering. Special Section: Geotechnics and Earthquake Hazards, Current Science, 87(10), 1398–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran, C. P., & Rajendran, K. (2005). The status of central seismic gap: A perspective based on the spatial and temporal aspects of the large Himalayan earthquakes. Tectonophysics, 395, 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje, E. M., Chang, W. J., & Stokoe, K. H., II. (2005). Development of an in situ dynamic liquefaction. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 28(1), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1971). Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 97(SM9), 1249–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., & Arango, I. (1983). Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 109(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Youd, T. L., & Holzer, T. L. (1994). Piezometer performance at Wild- life liquefaction site, California. Journal Geotechnical Engineering, 120(6), 975–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandan Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghosh, C., Bhowmik, S. (2023). Visualization of Liquefaction in Soils with PWP Measurements by Tapping. In: Sitharam, T.G., Jakka, R.S., Kolathayar, S. (eds) Advances in Earthquake Geotechnics. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3330-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3330-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3329-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3330-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics