Skip to main content

Automated Speckle Noise Suppression from Sentinel-1A Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery Using Adaptive Filtering Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 383))

  • 370 Accesses

Abstract

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery is formed by measuring the backscattered microwave energy to the satellite. However, it is well known that such recorded SAR data is amended by inevitable multiplicative noise known as speckle due to the interference of the returning electromagnetic waves scattered from multiple surfaces. This results in granular appearances in SAR imagery, which not only exacerbate the overall quality (edge and texture information) and exert hindrance to the understanding of the image features but also make target detection challenging. In order to effectively analyze SAR imagery, speckle (the high frequency) must often be suppressed to the greatest extent possible before the image can be used for further analysis. In this paper, despeckling is performed by applying MAP, Lee, Frost, Kuan and Boxcar adaptive filtering techniques with 3 × 3, 5 × 5 and 7 × 7 sized kernels. Evaluation of these adaptive filtering techniques is then performed using metrics—speckle suppression index, enhanced number of looks, noise variance, mean square error, mean and standard deviation. It is observed from the experimental results that the Lee filter with 5 × 5 sized kernel has produced reasonably good results with high enhanced number of looks value, low mean square error, speckle suppression index, noise variance values, and a higher percentage change in standard deviation compared to that from the MAP, Frost, Kuan and Boxcar filters. In addition to these quantitative measures, qualitative visual inspection of the despeckled image is also performed to compare results from these filters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anusha N, Bharathi B (2020) Flood detection and flood mapping using multi-temporal synthetic aperture radar and optical data. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 23(2):207–219

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anusha N, Bharathi B (2019) Despeckling of synthetic aperture radar satellite imagery using various filtering techniques. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 14(19):3401–3407

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argenti F, Lapini A, Alparone L (2013) A tutorial on speckle reduction in synthetic aperture radar images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag 1(3):6–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bioresita F, Puissant A, Stumpf A, Malet J-P (2018) A method for automatic and rapid mapping of water surfaces from Sentinel-1 imagery. Remote Sens 10(2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chini M, Hostache R, Giustarini L, Matgen A (2017) A hierarchical split-based approach for parametric thresholding of SAR images: flood inundation as a test case. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(12):6975–6988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi H, Jeong J (2019) Speckle noise reduction technique for SAR images using statistical characteristics of speckle noise and discrete wavelet transform. Remote Sens 11(10):1–27

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Filipponi F (2019) Sentinel-1 GRD preprocessing workflow. MDPI Proc 18(1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugan KS, Holtzman JC (1982) A model for RADAR images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 4(2):157–166

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gaikwad SP, Janim PV (2019) Pre-processing of SAR images through compressed sensing. In: 2019 3rd International conference on electronic communication aerospace technology (ICECA), June 12–14, Coimbatore, India, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geetha RV, Kalaivani S (2015) Quantitative approach of speckle noise reduction on synthetic aperture radar images. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence computing research, December 18–20, Coimbatore, India, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glaister J, Wong A, Clausi DA (2014) Despeckling of synthetic aperture radar images using monte carlo texture likelihood sampling. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(2):1238–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaushi P, Jabin S (2018) A comparative study of pre-processing techniques of SAR images. In: 2018 4th international conference on computing communication automation (ICCCA), December 14–15, Greater Noida, India, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P (1987) Adaptive restoration of images with speckle. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 35(3):373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulkarni S, Kedar M, Rege PP (2018) Comparison of different speckle noise reduction filters for RISAT-1 SAR imagery. In: 2018 international conference on communication and signal process, April 3–5, Chennai, India, pp 537–541

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JS (1980) Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 2(2):165–168

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JS, Jurkevich L, Dewaele P, Wambacq P, Oosterlinck A (1984) Speckle filtering of synthetic aperture radar images: a review. Remote Sens Rev 8(4):313–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JS, Pottier E (2009) Polarimetric radar imaging: from basics to applications, vol 1. CRC Press, pp 20–35

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mansourpour M, Rajabi MA, Blais JAR (2006) Effects and performance of speckle noise reduction filters on active radar and SAR images. In: Proceedings of international society for photogrammetry and remote sensing. Ankara Workshop 2006, February 14–16, Ankara, Turkey, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martinis S, Rieke C (2015) Backscatter analysis using multi-temporal and multi-frequency SAR data in the context of flood mapping at River Saale. Germany Remote Sens 7(6):7732–7752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mastriani M, Giraldez A (2016) Enhanced directional smoothing algorithm for edge-preserving smoothing of synthetic-aperture radar images. Meas Sci Rev 4(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  21. Qiu F, Berglund J, Jensen JR, Thakkar P, Ren D (2004) Speckle noise reduction in SAR imagery using a local adaptive median filter. GISci Remote Sens 41(3):244–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Raouf A, Lichtenegger J (1997) Integrated use of SAR and optical data for coastal zone management. In: Third ERS symposium on space at the service of our environment, March 14–21, Florence, Italy, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rana VK, Suryanarayana M (2019) Evaluation of SAR speckle filter technique for inundation mapping. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ 16(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sadykova D, James AP (2017) Quality assessment metrics for edge detection and edge-aware filtering: a tutorial review. In: 2017 International conference on advances in computing communications and informatics (ICACCI), September 13–16, Udupi, India, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shamsoddini A, Trinder JC (2012) Edge-detection-based filter for SAR speckle noise reduction. Int J Remote Sens 33(7):2296–2320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi Z, Fung KB (1984) Comparison of digital speckle filters. In: Proceedings of IGARSS ‘94-1994 IEEE International geoscience and remote sensing symposium, August 8–12, 1984, Pasadena, CA, USA, pp 2129–2133

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singh P, Shree R (2018) A new SAR image despeckling using directional smoothing filter and method noise thresholding. Eng Sci Tech Int J 21(4):589–610

    Google Scholar 

  28. Townsend PA, Walsh SJ (2019) Modeling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with radar and optical remote sensing. Geomorphology 21(3–4):295–312

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang J, Ge Y, Heuvelink GBM, Zhou C, Brus D (2012) Effect of the sampling design of ground control points on the geometric correction of remotely sensed imagery. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 18(1):91–100

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xu L, Zhang X, Lam KM, Xie J (2010) Image restoration based on PDEs and a non-local algorithm. In: Advances in multimedia information processing-PCM 2010, vol 6298(1). LNCS, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 362–371

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Anusha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anusha, N. (2023). Automated Speckle Noise Suppression from Sentinel-1A Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery Using Adaptive Filtering Techniques. In: Ranganathan, G., Fernando, X., Rocha, Á. (eds) Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 383. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4960-9_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics