Abstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery is formed by measuring the backscattered microwave energy to the satellite. However, it is well known that such recorded SAR data is amended by inevitable multiplicative noise known as speckle due to the interference of the returning electromagnetic waves scattered from multiple surfaces. This results in granular appearances in SAR imagery, which not only exacerbate the overall quality (edge and texture information) and exert hindrance to the understanding of the image features but also make target detection challenging. In order to effectively analyze SAR imagery, speckle (the high frequency) must often be suppressed to the greatest extent possible before the image can be used for further analysis. In this paper, despeckling is performed by applying MAP, Lee, Frost, Kuan and Boxcar adaptive filtering techniques with 3 × 3, 5 × 5 and 7 × 7 sized kernels. Evaluation of these adaptive filtering techniques is then performed using metrics—speckle suppression index, enhanced number of looks, noise variance, mean square error, mean and standard deviation. It is observed from the experimental results that the Lee filter with 5 × 5 sized kernel has produced reasonably good results with high enhanced number of looks value, low mean square error, speckle suppression index, noise variance values, and a higher percentage change in standard deviation compared to that from the MAP, Frost, Kuan and Boxcar filters. In addition to these quantitative measures, qualitative visual inspection of the despeckled image is also performed to compare results from these filters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anusha N, Bharathi B (2020) Flood detection and flood mapping using multi-temporal synthetic aperture radar and optical data. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 23(2):207–219
Anusha N, Bharathi B (2019) Despeckling of synthetic aperture radar satellite imagery using various filtering techniques. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 14(19):3401–3407
Argenti F, Lapini A, Alparone L (2013) A tutorial on speckle reduction in synthetic aperture radar images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag 1(3):6–35
Bioresita F, Puissant A, Stumpf A, Malet J-P (2018) A method for automatic and rapid mapping of water surfaces from Sentinel-1 imagery. Remote Sens 10(2):1–17
Chini M, Hostache R, Giustarini L, Matgen A (2017) A hierarchical split-based approach for parametric thresholding of SAR images: flood inundation as a test case. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(12):6975–6988
Choi H, Jeong J (2019) Speckle noise reduction technique for SAR images using statistical characteristics of speckle noise and discrete wavelet transform. Remote Sens 11(10):1–27
Filipponi F (2019) Sentinel-1 GRD preprocessing workflow. MDPI Proc 18(1):1–4
Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugan KS, Holtzman JC (1982) A model for RADAR images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 4(2):157–166
Gaikwad SP, Janim PV (2019) Pre-processing of SAR images through compressed sensing. In: 2019 3rd International conference on electronic communication aerospace technology (ICECA), June 12–14, Coimbatore, India, pp 1–4
Geetha RV, Kalaivani S (2015) Quantitative approach of speckle noise reduction on synthetic aperture radar images. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence computing research, December 18–20, Coimbatore, India, pp 1–4
Glaister J, Wong A, Clausi DA (2014) Despeckling of synthetic aperture radar images using monte carlo texture likelihood sampling. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(2):1238–1248
Kaushi P, Jabin S (2018) A comparative study of pre-processing techniques of SAR images. In: 2018 4th international conference on computing communication automation (ICCCA), December 14–15, Greater Noida, India, pp 1–4
Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P (1987) Adaptive restoration of images with speckle. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 35(3):373–383
Kulkarni S, Kedar M, Rege PP (2018) Comparison of different speckle noise reduction filters for RISAT-1 SAR imagery. In: 2018 international conference on communication and signal process, April 3–5, Chennai, India, pp 537–541
Lee JS (1980) Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 2(2):165–168
Lee JS, Jurkevich L, Dewaele P, Wambacq P, Oosterlinck A (1984) Speckle filtering of synthetic aperture radar images: a review. Remote Sens Rev 8(4):313–340
Lee JS, Pottier E (2009) Polarimetric radar imaging: from basics to applications, vol 1. CRC Press, pp 20–35
Mansourpour M, Rajabi MA, Blais JAR (2006) Effects and performance of speckle noise reduction filters on active radar and SAR images. In: Proceedings of international society for photogrammetry and remote sensing. Ankara Workshop 2006, February 14–16, Ankara, Turkey, pp 1–6
Martinis S, Rieke C (2015) Backscatter analysis using multi-temporal and multi-frequency SAR data in the context of flood mapping at River Saale. Germany Remote Sens 7(6):7732–7752
Mastriani M, Giraldez A (2016) Enhanced directional smoothing algorithm for edge-preserving smoothing of synthetic-aperture radar images. Meas Sci Rev 4(3):1–10
Qiu F, Berglund J, Jensen JR, Thakkar P, Ren D (2004) Speckle noise reduction in SAR imagery using a local adaptive median filter. GISci Remote Sens 41(3):244–266
Raouf A, Lichtenegger J (1997) Integrated use of SAR and optical data for coastal zone management. In: Third ERS symposium on space at the service of our environment, March 14–21, Florence, Italy, pp 1–10
Rana VK, Suryanarayana M (2019) Evaluation of SAR speckle filter technique for inundation mapping. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ 16(1):1–18
Sadykova D, James AP (2017) Quality assessment metrics for edge detection and edge-aware filtering: a tutorial review. In: 2017 International conference on advances in computing communications and informatics (ICACCI), September 13–16, Udupi, India, pp 1–4
Shamsoddini A, Trinder JC (2012) Edge-detection-based filter for SAR speckle noise reduction. Int J Remote Sens 33(7):2296–2320
Shi Z, Fung KB (1984) Comparison of digital speckle filters. In: Proceedings of IGARSS ‘94-1994 IEEE International geoscience and remote sensing symposium, August 8–12, 1984, Pasadena, CA, USA, pp 2129–2133
Singh P, Shree R (2018) A new SAR image despeckling using directional smoothing filter and method noise thresholding. Eng Sci Tech Int J 21(4):589–610
Townsend PA, Walsh SJ (2019) Modeling floodplain inundation using an integrated GIS with radar and optical remote sensing. Geomorphology 21(3–4):295–312
Wang J, Ge Y, Heuvelink GBM, Zhou C, Brus D (2012) Effect of the sampling design of ground control points on the geometric correction of remotely sensed imagery. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 18(1):91–100
Xu L, Zhang X, Lam KM, Xie J (2010) Image restoration based on PDEs and a non-local algorithm. In: Advances in multimedia information processing-PCM 2010, vol 6298(1). LNCS, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 362–371
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Anusha, N. (2023). Automated Speckle Noise Suppression from Sentinel-1A Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery Using Adaptive Filtering Techniques. In: Ranganathan, G., Fernando, X., Rocha, Á. (eds) Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 383. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4960-9_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4960-9_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4959-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4960-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)