Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Recent Advancements in Connected Autonomous Vehicle Technologies ((RACAVT,volume 3))

  • 516 Accesses

Abstract

The rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs) brings challenges and opportunities for electricity systems. EV flexibility, such as smart charging and vehicle-to-grid services, plays a crucial role in helping systems to integrate renewable generation, thus facilitating achieving Net-Zero carbon targets. Market measures are of great help to incorporate a sufficient level of flexibility for electricity system operation requirements. Specifically, demand-side flexibility (DSF) should be fairly rewarded when providing various services to the systems. EV flexibility trading effectively supports the integration of renewable energy resources (RERs) and uncertain demand. Local energy trading mechanisms with EV flexibility can help efficiently facilitate flexibility markets. This chapter classifies EV flexibility and investigates the potential values for the electricity system. The local market structures and trading mechanisms for enabling EV flexibility are introduced. An example demonstration shows that integrating EV flexibility in the local energy market allows for more efficient operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

DSF:

Demand-side Flexibility

EV:

Electric Vehicle

P2P:

Peer-to-Peer

HEV:

Hybrid EV

FCEV:

Fuel Cell EV

PETCON:

P2P Electricity Trading System with Consortium Blockchain

PV:

Photovoltaic

DA:

Day-ahead

FIAD:

Flexibility Index of Aggregate Demand

PFL:

Percentage Flexibility Level

BEV:

Battery EV

PHEV:

Plug-in Hybrid EV

DSO:

Distribution System Operator

CCGT:

Combined Cycle Gas Turbine

WT:

Wind Turbine

MES:

Multi-Energy System

References

  1. X. Yan, C. Gu, F. Li, Z. Wang, LMP-based pricing for energy storage in local market to facilitate PV penetration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(3), 3373–3382 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Nikoobakht, J. Aghaei, M. Shafie-Khah, J.P.S. Cataláo, Assessing increased flexibility of energy storage and demand response to accommodate a high penetration of renewable energy sources. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 10(2), 659–669 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Yan, C. Gu, F. Li, Z. Wang, LMP-based pricing for energy storage in local market to facilitate PV penetration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(3), 3373–3382 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. X. Yan, C. Gu, F. Li, Y. Xiang, Network pricing for customer-operated energy storage in distribution networks. Appl. Energy 212, 283–292 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Zhao, C. Gu, Z. Hu, D. Xie, I. Hernando-Gil, Y. Shen, Distributionally robust hydrogen optimization with ensured security and multi-energy couplings. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 36(1), 504–513 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Zhang, R. Li, F. Li, A novel peer-to-peer local electricity market for joint trading of energy and uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11(2), 1205–1215 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Shi, Q. Ma, N. Smith, F. Li, Data-driven uncertainty quantification and characterization for household energy demand across multiple time-scales. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10(3), 3092–3102 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Shi, M. Xu, R. Li, Deep learning for household load forecasting—a novel pooling deep RNN. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9(5), 5271–5280 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Golden, P. Powell, Towards a definition of flexibility: in search of the Holy Grail? Omega 28(4), 373–384 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Ma, V. Silva, R. Belhomme, D.S. Kirschen, L.F. Ochoa, Evaluating and planning flexibility in sustainable power systems. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 4(1), 200–209 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Lannoye, D. Flynn, M.O. Malley, Evaluation of power system flexibility. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27(2), 922–931 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. I.A. Sajjad, G. Chicco, R. Napoli, Definitions of demand flexibility for aggregate residential loads. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(6), 2633–2643 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. O. I. National Smart Grid Mission Ministry of Power, Electric vehicles in India. https://vikaspedia.in/energy/energy-efficiency/electric-vehicles-in-india

  14. Y. Xue, X. Zhang, C. Yang, AC filterless flexible LCC HVDC with reduced voltage rating of controllable capacitors. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(5), 5507–5518 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Electric, What are the different methods of charging an electric vehicle? https://www.kia.com/eu/about-kia/experience-kia/technology/electrification/charging-methods-for-electric-cars/

  16. D. Xie, H. Chu, C. Gu, F. Li, Y. Zhang, A novel dispatching control strategy for EVs intelligent integrated stations. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(2), 802–811 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Gottwalt, J. Gärttner, H. Schmeck, C. Weinhardt, Modeling and valuation of residential demand flexibility for renewable energy integration. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(6), 2565–2574 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P.J. Ramírez, D. Papadaskalopoulos, G. Strbac, Co-optimization of generation expansion planning and electric vehicles flexibility. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(3), 1609–1619 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Esmat, J. Usaola, M. A. N. Moreno, A decentralized local flexibility market considering the uncertainty of demand. Energies 11(8), 2078 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Roos, Designing a joint market for procurement of transmission and distribution system services from demand flexibility. Renew. Energy Focus 21, 16–24 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Bouorakima, J. Boubert, Y. Desgrange, Flexibilities in grid planning: case studies on the French distribution system. CIRED–Open Access Proc. J. 2017(1), 2283–2286 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Li, Z.Y. Dong, G. Chen, J. Liu, F. Luo, Flexible transmission expansion planning associated with large-scale wind farms integration considering demand response. IET Generat. Trans. Distribut. 9, 2276–2283 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Morstyn, A. Teytelboym, M.D. McCulloch, Designing decentralized markets for distribution system flexibility. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 34(3), 2128–2139 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Khajeh, H. Firoozi, H. Laaksonen, M. Shafie-khah, Peer-to-peer flexibility trading of end-users at distribution networks. pp. 797–799

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Long, Y. Zhou, J. Wu, A game theoretic approach for peer to peer energy trading. Energy Proc 159, 454–459 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Tushar, B. Chai, C. Yuen, S. Huang, D.B. Smith, H.V. Poor, Z. Yang, Energy storage sharing in smart grid: a modified auction-based approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7(3), 1462–1475 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Shamsi, H. Xie, A. Longe, J.-Y. Joo, Economic dispatch for an agent-based community microgrid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7, 1–8 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Zhou, J. Wu, C. Long, Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework. Appl. Energy 222, 993–1022 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. M.H. Cintuglu, H. Martin, O.A. Mohammed, Real-time implementation of multiagent-based game theory reverse auction model for microgrid market operation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 6(2), 1064–1072 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Y. Rizk, M. Awad, E. Tunstel, Decision making in multi-agent systems: a survey. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. 10, 514–529 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. W. Tushar, C. Yuen, D.B. Smith, H.V. Poor, Price discrimination for energy trading in smart grid: a game theoretic approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8(4), 1790–1801 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Cui, Y.-W. Wang, N. Liu, A distributed game-based pricing strategy for energy sharing in microgrid with PV prosumers. IET Renew. Power Generat. 12, 380–388 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Lo Prete, B.F. Hobbs, A cooperative game theoretic analysis of incentives for microgrids in regulated electricity markets. Appl. Energy 169, 524–541 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. Said, A decentralized electricity trading framework (DETF) for connected EVs: a blockchain and machine learning for profit margin optimization. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 17(10), 6594–6602 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. N. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Kang, J. Cheng, D. He, Blockchain technique in the energy internet: preliminary research framework and typical applications, vol. 36. (2016), pp. 4011–4022

    Google Scholar 

  36. Z. Li, J. Kang, R. Yu, D. Ye, Q. Deng, Y. Zhang, Consortium blockchain for secure energy trading in industrial internet of things. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 14(8), 3690–3700 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Kang, R. Yu, X. Huang, S. Maharjan, Y. Zhang, E. Hossain, Enabling localized peer-to-peer electricity trading among plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using consortium blockchains. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 13(6), 3154–3164 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Phelps, S. Parsons, P. McBurney, An evolutionary game-theoretic comparison of two double-auction market designs. pp. 101–114

    Google Scholar 

  39. G.E. Rahi, S.R. Etesami, W. Saad, N.B. Mandayam, H.V. Poor, Managing price uncertainty in prosumer-centric energy trading: a prospect-theoretic stackelberg game approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10(1), 702–713 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. R. Shipman, S. Naylor, J. Pinchin, R. Gough, M. Gillott, Learning capacity: predicting user decisions for vehicle-to-grid services. Energy Inform. 2(1), 37 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Shibl, L. Ismail, A. Massoud, Machine learning-based management of electric vehicles charging: towards highly-dispersed fast chargers. Energies 13, 5429 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  42. P. Zhao, C. Gu, Z. Cao, Y. Shen, F. Teng, X. Chen, C. Wu, D. Huo, X. Xu, S. Li, Data-driven multi-energy investment and management under earthquakes. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 17(10), 6939–6950 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. P. Zhao, C. Gu, Z. Cao, Z. Hu, X. Zhang, X. Chen, I. Hernando-Gil, Y. Ding, Economic-effective multi-energy management considering voltage regulation networked with energy hubs. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 36(3), 2503–2515 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Y. Shen, C. Gu, X. Yang, P. Zhao, Impact analysis of seismic events on integrated electricity and natural gas systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 36(4), 1923–1931 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chenghong Gu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheng, S., Xie, D., Gu, C. (2023). Local Energy Trading with EV Flexibility. In: Cao, Y., Zhang, Y., Gu, C. (eds) Automated and Electric Vehicle: Design, Informatics and Sustainability. Recent Advancements in Connected Autonomous Vehicle Technologies, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5751-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics