Skip to main content

Torque Feedforward Control of the Parallel Spindle Head Feed Axes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Mechanism, Machine Science and Engineering in China (CCMMS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1064 Accesses

Abstract

The hybrid machine tool based on parallel spindle heads can efficiently process complex parts, but the load of the feed axes of the spindle head has the characteristics of nonlinear and coupling, which brings difficulties to the control. In this paper, the contour error of the tool center point (TCP) is greatly reduced by the method of dynamic modeling and feedforward. Specifically, the kinematic modeling is performed using the vector loop method, the dynamic modeling is performed using the virtual work principle, and the frictional force modeling is performed using the Stribeck model to obtain the dynamic model of the spindle head. The servo system of the feed axis is modeled and then the torque feedforward module is designed. Finally, in MATLAB/Simulink simulation, torque feedforward effectively reduces the contour error of TCP. Based on the analysis of the simulation results, the load torque of the parallel spindle head has the characteristics of nonlinearity and coupling. The evaluation index LCE (load caused error) is proposed, and the load torque mainly causes errors during acceleration, deceleration and commutation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tutunea-Fatan OR, Feng HY (2004) Configuration analysis of five-axis machine tools using a generic kinematic model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(11):1235–1243

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu S, Ding G, Qin S, Lei J, Zhuang L, Yan K (2012) Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 52(1):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li Q, Ibaraki S, Wang W (2022) Proposal of a machining test to evaluate dynamic synchronization error of rotary and linear axes with reversal of rotation direction. J Manuf Sci Eng 144(4)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tsai LW (1999) Robot analysis: the mechanics of serial and parallel manipulators. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pandilov Z, Dukovski V (2012) Parallel kinematics machine tools: overview-from history to the future. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara 10(2):111

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weck M, Staimer D (2002) Parallel kinematic machine tools—current state and future potentials. CIRP Ann 51(2):671–683

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu Y, Zhang D, Yao J, Zhao Y (2017) Type synthesis of the 2R1T parallel mechanism with two continuous rotational axes and study on the principle of its motion decoupling. Mech Mach Theory 108:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li M, Wang L, Yu G, Li W (2021) A new calibration method for hybrid machine tools using virtual tool center point position constraint. Measurement 181:109582

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xie Z, Xie F, Liu XJ, Wang J, Mei B (2021) Tracking error prediction informed motion control of a parallel machine tool for high-performance machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 164:103714

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ziegler JG, Nichols NB (1942) Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans ASME 64:11

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagaraj B, Murugananth N (2010) A comparative study of PID controller tuning using GA, EP, PSO and ACO. In: 2010 international conference on communication control and computing technologies. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar R, Gupta RA, Singh B (2006) Intelligent tuned PID controllers for PMSM drive—a critical analysis. In: 2006 IEEE international conference on industrial technology. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jia Z, Song D, Ma J, Gao Y (2017) Pre-compensation for continuous-path running trajectory error in high-speed machining of parts with varied curvature features. Chin J Mech Eng 30(1):37–45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song DN, Ma JW, Jia ZY, Gao YY (2017) Estimation and compensation for continuous-path running trajectory error in high-feed-speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5):1495–1508

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z, Hu C, Zhu Y (2019) Dynamical model based contouring error position-loop feedforward control for multiaxis motion systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 15(8):4686–4695

    Google Scholar 

  16. Poo AN, Bollinger JG, Younkin GW (1972) Dynamic errors in type 1 contouring systems. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 4:477–484

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xi XC, Poo AN, Hong GS (2009) Improving contouring accuracy by tuning gains for a bi-axial CNC machine. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(5):395–406

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xie WF (2007) Sliding-mode-observer-based adaptive control for servo actuator with friction. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 54(3):1517–1527

    Google Scholar 

  19. Makarov M, Grossard M, Rodriguez-Ayerbe P, Dumur D (2016) Modeling and preview H∞ control design for motion control of elastic-joint robots with uncertainties. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(10):6429–6438

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li F, Jiang Y, Li T, Ehmann KF (2018) Compensation of dynamic mechanical tracking errors in ball screw drives. Mechatronics 55:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grzesiak LM, Tarczewski T (2013) PMSM servo-drive control system with a state feedback and a load torque feedforward compensation. COMPEL—Int J Comput Math Electr Electron Eng

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuo LY, Yen JY (2001) Servo parameter tuning for a 5-axis machine center based upon GA rules. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(11):1535–1550

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khosravi MA, Taghirad HD (2014) Dynamic modeling and control of parallel robots with elastic cables: singular perturbation approach. IEEE Trans Robot 30(3):694–704

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang B, Wu J, Wang L, Yu Z, Fu P (2018) A method to realize accurate dynamic feedforward control of a spray-painting robot for airplane wings. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 23(3):1182–1192

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ding Q, Wang W, Ding J, Zhang J, Hu C, Lei F, Du L, Wang L (2022) RTCP test axis motion planning for five-axis machine tool dynamic performance using observability optimization based on modified genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119(1):435–462

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51975319 and 51905302).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guang Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, L., Kong, X., Yu, G. (2023). Torque Feedforward Control of the Parallel Spindle Head Feed Axes. In: Liu, X. (eds) Advances in Mechanism, Machine Science and Engineering in China. CCMMS 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9398-5_86

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9398-5_86

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-9397-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-9398-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics