Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Multilingual Education ((MULT,volume 15))

Abstract

This research examines the use of newly-developed software applications such as e-dictionaries, digital flash cards, and digital character writing programs in the L2 Chinese language classroom in higher education. The acquisition of literacy in a character-based language such as Chinese can be difficult and time-consuming for the Second Language Learner. The objective is to investigate the extent to which these digital tools can reduce learner frustration, stimulate student motivation, and thus enhance student learning. This study reports on the introduction of a character-learning software application to provide spaced repetition learning at beginner level Chinese in a Western university. A student questionnaire, focus group and data analytics were used to assess take-up, frequency of use, and Chinese character acquisition. It was found that digital tools for Chinese character learning have the potential to enhance student engagement with their learning and allow for a broader range of strategies in the learning of Chinese character script. Challenges remain in adapting digital learning based on space repetition to the typical classroom schedule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The most important of these is the radical, which gives an indication of generalized meaning or categorization, eg. the water radical appears in words to do with rivers systems. A small number of characters are pictograms, eg.mu木 to represent ‘tree’ or ideograms which represent a more abstract notion such as above or below (shang 上, xia 下). The majority of characters in use in the present day are “ideophonetic compounds”, that is, they contain a radical which indicates a root meaning and a phonetic graph that gives an indication of sound (Walls and Walls 2009:7).

References

  • DeFrancis, J. (1984). The Chinese language: Fact and fantasy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Rouviere, J. (2013). Chinese radicals in spaced repetition systems: a pilot study on the acquisition of Chinese characters by students learning Chinese as a foreign language. M. Phil dissertation, Stellenbosch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A.R., Frank, V., Richardson, L.D. , & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K., Wang, S., Iventosch, M. S., & Goodman, Y. (Eds.). (2012). Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschel, R., & Fritz, E. (2013). Learning vocabulary: CALL programs versus vocabulary notebooks. System, 41(3), 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. S., & Bryant, P. (1997). Learning to read Chinese beyond the logographic phrase. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, Y. N. (2012). How a morphosyllabic writing system works in Chinese. In K. Goodman, S. Wang, M. S. Iventosch, & Y. Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 16–31). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iventosch, M. S. (2012). Teaching Japanese written language. In K. Goodman, S. Wang, M. S. Iventosch, & Y. Goodman (Eds.), Reading in Asian languages: Making sense of written texts in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (pp. 236–257). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, H. C. (2011). A critical analysis of the various ways of teaching Chinese characters. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, D. (1991). Why Chinese is so damn hard. In V.H. Mair (Ed.), Schriftfestschrift: Essays on writing and language in honor of John DeFrancis on his eightieth birthday (pp. 59–70). San Francisco: Sino-Platonic Papers, No. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shei, C., & Hsieh, H. (2012). Linkit: A CALL system for learning Chinese characters, words, and phrases. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, C. (1995). Du shu kan bao xuyao duoshao zi? Ming Bao, 1, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C. (2006). Chinese: An linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, V., & Huang, C. (2012). An intelligent e-learning software for learning to write correct Chinese characters on mobile devices. Interactive Technology and Smart Education., 9(4), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, Y. L., & Walls, J. W. (2009). Using Chinese: A guide to contemporary usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, A., Guo, Y., & Dynia, J. (2013). Foreign language reading anxiety: Chinese as a foreign language in the United States. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 764–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne E. McLaren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Survey Instrument

Note that Q. 7–9 refer to an uploaded dialogue exercise that does not form part of the present study.

Appendix 1: Survey Instrument

1.1 Chinese E-Learning Survey 2014

You are invited to fill in this survey which will enable the Chinese program to learn more about your experience using the eLearning materials provided for Chinese in the second semester 2014. This will help us to further refine our teaching methods and improve student learning in this subject in future.

Your participation is warmly encouraged but entirely voluntary. In accordance with standard university research ethics, before you fill in this survey we ask you to read the Plain Language Statement and to read and sign the accompanying Consent Form.

This survey is anonymous. Please don’t write your name.

  1. 1.

    We provided free access to Skritter to help you learn Chinese characters. How often did you end up using Skritter:

     Not at all □

    Less than once a week □

    About once a week □

    More often □

  2. 2.

    If you answered “Not at all” above, please tell us why you didn’t use Skritter:

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

  3. 3.

    If you used Skritter, please indicate how you feel it helped:

     

    Strongly disagree

    Disagree

    Neither Agree or Disagree

    Agree

    Strongly Agree

    Learning to write Chinese characters

    Learning Chinese words and meanings

    Learning Chinese pronunciation

    Learning Chinese tones

  4. 4.

    We provided an introduction to the mobile phone dictionary app Pleco. We’d like to know how far you got:

    (a)

    Looked over Pleco information (LMS, App Store etc)

    (b)

    Downloaded Pleco

    (c)

    Bought Pleco (pack or add-on)

    (d)

    Used Pleco during Chinese 2

    (e)

    Used Pleco flashcards for Chinese 2 (from the LMS)

  5. 5.

    If you didn’t get as far as using Pleco (4d) please briefly tell us why:

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

  6. 6.

    Concerning the materials provided on the Chinese 2 subject LMS, please indicate which you read, accessed or downloaded (you can tick more than one):

    (a)

    Weekly schedule

    (b)

    Chinese character worksheets PDFs

    (c)

    New words audio files

    (d)

    Listening comprehension audio files and reference PDFs

    (e)

    Word definitions PDFs

    (f)

    Class notes PDFs

  7. 7.

    We introduced a new Dialogue Task

     

    Strongly disagree

    Disagree

    Neither Agree or Disagree

    Agree

    Strongly Agree

    The Tasks were adequately explained

    I knew what was expected of me

    I valued the opportunity to practice outside of class

    I felt the Task helped me prepare for the oral examination

    The peer-review transcription was helpful comprehension practice

    The peer-review transcription gave me helpful feedback

    I was able to coordinate with my group effectively

    I discussed the Task with students not in my group

  8. 8.

    Did you experience any problems during the Dialogue Task? Please describe below:

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

  9. 9.

    Did you access the other recordings and transcriptions in the Dialogue Task Files section of the LMS?

    Yes □

    No □

  10. 10.

    If you are continuing next year. Would you find it useful to attend a workshop on Pleco (and other eLearning tools) outside of your usual classes?

    Yes □

    Maybe □

    No □

  11. 11.

    Please provide any other comments on the eLearning:

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR PARTICIPATING IN THIS RESEARCH PROJECT!

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McLaren, A.E., Bettinson, M. (2016). Digital Tools for Chinese Character Acquisition and Their Impact on Student Motivation. In: Moloney, R., Xu, H. (eds) Exploring Innovative Pedagogy in the Teaching and Learning of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Multilingual Education, vol 15. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-772-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-772-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-771-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-772-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics