Skip to main content

Curing Regimes Effect on the Strength Parameters of Geopolymer Concrete: A Short Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials

Abstract

Concrete is the world’s second most consumed material after water. The prime ingredient of conventional concrete is the cement which acts as a binder. It is a well-known fact that cement manufacturing industries are responsible for carbon dioxide emission into the atmosphere, thereby polluting the environment. With the expansion in infrastructural projects, the demand for concrete is bound to rise. This will result in more concrete production and a rise in environmental pollution. Emphasis on environmental protection has led to an effort for finding an appropriate sustainable construction material alternative to traditional cement concrete. Geopolymer concrete also known as alkali-activated concrete can be an appropriate alternative to traditional cement concrete because of its lesser carbon footprint than the traditional one. Geopolymer concrete is still in the research and developing phase with no proper guidelines and code of practice. Geopolymer concrete behaves differently in different curing conditions. This study emphasizes the effect of different curing regimes on the strength parameters of geopolymer concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ojha, A, Chouhan V, Gupta L, Goswami S (2020) A case study on project performance of railway underpass construction project in Jaipur, India. In: AIP conference proceedings, pp 020005. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141542

  2. Rangan BV, Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DM (2005) Studies on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the world congress geopolymer, Saint Quentin, France, pp 133–137

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ojha A, Gupta L (2018) Study on the information technology impact questionnaire ITIQ on the construction industry in India. Urban Chall Emerg Econ, ASCE, USA, pp 552–557

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta L, Ojha A, Rosyidi SAP (2020) Field study to evaluate built-in temperature differential (BITD) at interior load position through concrete blocks. In: Materials today: proceedings, pp 1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.808

  5. Ojha A, Gupta L (2020) Comparative study on mechanical properties of conventional and geo-polymer concrete with recycled coarse aggregate. In Materials Today: Proceedings pp. 1403-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.811

  6. Nurruddin MF, Sani H, Mohammed BS, Shaaban I (2018) Methods of curing geopolymer concrete: a review. Int J Adv Appl Sci 5:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karunanithi S, Anandan S (2014) Flexural toughness properties of reinforced steel fibre incorporated alkali activated slag concrete. Adv Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/719436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vinodhini P, Kumaravel S, Girija P (2015) Effect of ambient curing in geopolymer concrete. Int J App Eng Res 10:46–48

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vijai K, Kumutha R, Vishnuram B (2010) Effect of types of curing on strength of geopolymer concrete. Int J of Phy Sci 5:1419–1423

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rao GM, Venu M (2020) Mix design methodology for fly ash and GGBS-based geopolymer concrete. Adv Struct Eng. Springer, Singapore, pp 173–181

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jindal BB, Singhal D, Sharma SK (2017) Suitability of ambient-cured alccofines added low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Ind J Sci Tech 10:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumaravel S (2014) Development of various curing effect of nominal strength geopolymer concrete. J Eng Sci Tech Rev 7:116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumaravel S, Thirugnanasambandam S, Jeyasehar CA (2014) Flexural behavior of geopolymer concrete beams with GGBS. IUP J Str Eng 7:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  14. Noushini A, Babaee M, Castel A (2016) Suitability of heat-cured low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete for precast applications. Mag Con Res 68:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Adam AA, Horianto (2014) The effect of temperature and duration of curing on the strength of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. In: Procedia engineering, pp 410–414

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta L, Patil A, Ojha A (2016) A study on the marshall properties Of DBM mix prepared using Vg-30 and Crmb-55 as binder materials. Int J Res Eng Tech 5:32–36

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pangdaeng S, Phoo-ngernkham T, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P (2014) Influence of curing conditions on properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer containing Portland cement as additive. Mat Des 53:269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yewale VV, Shirsath MN, Hake SL (2016) Evaluation of efficient type of curing for geopolymer concrete. Evaluation 3:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  19. Azarsa P, Gupta R (2020) Comparative study involving effect of curing regime on elastic modulus of geopolymer concrete. Buildings 10:101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Srinivasan K, Sivakumar A (2015) Chemical activation and curing regime of geopolymer concretes. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-construction materials, pp 24–34

    Google Scholar 

  21. Venkateswara Rao J, Srinivasa Rao K, Rambabu K (2019) Performance of heat and ambient cured geopolymer concrete exposed to acid attack. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-construction materials, pp 192–200

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ishak S, Lee HS, Singh JK, Ariffin MAM, Lim NHAS, Yang HM (2019) Performance of fly ash geopolymer concrete incorporating bamboo ash at elevated temperature. Materials 12:3404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Patil AA, Chore HS, Dode PA (2014) Effect of curing condition on strength of geopolymer concrete. Adv in Con Const 2:029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rana PK, Dash RR, Ganguly RI (2014) Geopolymer from industrial wastes: a construction material for 22nd century. Adv Compos Aerosp Marine, Land Appl. Springer, Cham, pp 43–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avinash Ojha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ojha, A., Aggarwal, P., Gupta, L. (2021). Curing Regimes Effect on the Strength Parameters of Geopolymer Concrete: A Short Review. In: Biswas, S., Metya, S., Kumar, S., Samui, P. (eds) Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 124. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4590-4_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4590-4_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4589-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4590-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics