Abstract
Concrete is the world’s second most consumed material after water. The prime ingredient of conventional concrete is the cement which acts as a binder. It is a well-known fact that cement manufacturing industries are responsible for carbon dioxide emission into the atmosphere, thereby polluting the environment. With the expansion in infrastructural projects, the demand for concrete is bound to rise. This will result in more concrete production and a rise in environmental pollution. Emphasis on environmental protection has led to an effort for finding an appropriate sustainable construction material alternative to traditional cement concrete. Geopolymer concrete also known as alkali-activated concrete can be an appropriate alternative to traditional cement concrete because of its lesser carbon footprint than the traditional one. Geopolymer concrete is still in the research and developing phase with no proper guidelines and code of practice. Geopolymer concrete behaves differently in different curing conditions. This study emphasizes the effect of different curing regimes on the strength parameters of geopolymer concrete.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ojha, A, Chouhan V, Gupta L, Goswami S (2020) A case study on project performance of railway underpass construction project in Jaipur, India. In: AIP conference proceedings, pp 020005. AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141542
Rangan BV, Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DM (2005) Studies on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the world congress geopolymer, Saint Quentin, France, pp 133–137
Ojha A, Gupta L (2018) Study on the information technology impact questionnaire ITIQ on the construction industry in India. Urban Chall Emerg Econ, ASCE, USA, pp 552–557
Gupta L, Ojha A, Rosyidi SAP (2020) Field study to evaluate built-in temperature differential (BITD) at interior load position through concrete blocks. In: Materials today: proceedings, pp 1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.808
Ojha A, Gupta L (2020) Comparative study on mechanical properties of conventional and geo-polymer concrete with recycled coarse aggregate. In Materials Today: Proceedings pp. 1403-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.811
Nurruddin MF, Sani H, Mohammed BS, Shaaban I (2018) Methods of curing geopolymer concrete: a review. Int J Adv Appl Sci 5:31–36
Karunanithi S, Anandan S (2014) Flexural toughness properties of reinforced steel fibre incorporated alkali activated slag concrete. Adv Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/719436
Vinodhini P, Kumaravel S, Girija P (2015) Effect of ambient curing in geopolymer concrete. Int J App Eng Res 10:46–48
Vijai K, Kumutha R, Vishnuram B (2010) Effect of types of curing on strength of geopolymer concrete. Int J of Phy Sci 5:1419–1423
Rao GM, Venu M (2020) Mix design methodology for fly ash and GGBS-based geopolymer concrete. Adv Struct Eng. Springer, Singapore, pp 173–181
Jindal BB, Singhal D, Sharma SK (2017) Suitability of ambient-cured alccofines added low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Ind J Sci Tech 10:1–10
Kumaravel S (2014) Development of various curing effect of nominal strength geopolymer concrete. J Eng Sci Tech Rev 7:116–119
Kumaravel S, Thirugnanasambandam S, Jeyasehar CA (2014) Flexural behavior of geopolymer concrete beams with GGBS. IUP J Str Eng 7:45–54
Noushini A, Babaee M, Castel A (2016) Suitability of heat-cured low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete for precast applications. Mag Con Res 68:163–177
Adam AA, Horianto (2014) The effect of temperature and duration of curing on the strength of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. In: Procedia engineering, pp 410–414
Gupta L, Patil A, Ojha A (2016) A study on the marshall properties Of DBM mix prepared using Vg-30 and Crmb-55 as binder materials. Int J Res Eng Tech 5:32–36
Pangdaeng S, Phoo-ngernkham T, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P (2014) Influence of curing conditions on properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer containing Portland cement as additive. Mat Des 53:269–274
Yewale VV, Shirsath MN, Hake SL (2016) Evaluation of efficient type of curing for geopolymer concrete. Evaluation 3:10–14
Azarsa P, Gupta R (2020) Comparative study involving effect of curing regime on elastic modulus of geopolymer concrete. Buildings 10:101
Srinivasan K, Sivakumar A (2015) Chemical activation and curing regime of geopolymer concretes. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-construction materials, pp 24–34
Venkateswara Rao J, Srinivasa Rao K, Rambabu K (2019) Performance of heat and ambient cured geopolymer concrete exposed to acid attack. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-construction materials, pp 192–200
Ishak S, Lee HS, Singh JK, Ariffin MAM, Lim NHAS, Yang HM (2019) Performance of fly ash geopolymer concrete incorporating bamboo ash at elevated temperature. Materials 12:3404
Patil AA, Chore HS, Dode PA (2014) Effect of curing condition on strength of geopolymer concrete. Adv in Con Const 2:029
Rana PK, Dash RR, Ganguly RI (2014) Geopolymer from industrial wastes: a construction material for 22nd century. Adv Compos Aerosp Marine, Land Appl. Springer, Cham, pp 43–54
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ojha, A., Aggarwal, P., Gupta, L. (2021). Curing Regimes Effect on the Strength Parameters of Geopolymer Concrete: A Short Review. In: Biswas, S., Metya, S., Kumar, S., Samui, P. (eds) Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 124. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4590-4_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4590-4_61
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4589-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4590-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)