Skip to main content

Private Rental in Australia: A Lightly Regulated Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Private Rental Sector in Australia

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the body of regulation which sets the norms and expected behaviours involved in Australia’s landlord-tenant relations. It opens by exploring the rationale for private rental regulation, especially in terms of the prevailing neo-liberal governance philosophy. Next, we present a national overview of tenancy regulation across Australia highlighting, where appropriate, particularly notable features of systems in specific jurisdictions. Drawing on this overview the chapter then discusses three key aspects of landlord-tenant relations, namely rent regulation, security of tenure and landlord repairing obligations. After briefly reviewing the distinct regulatory approaches that relate to boarding houses, we next summarise recent PRS regulatory reform debates and, in conclusion, reflect on the overall picture and future prospects for change in the balance of power between landlords and tenants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Referred to in Victoria as ‘rooming houses’. For simplicity, the term boarding houses is used from this point onwards throughout the book.

  2. 2.

    For example, under NSW RTA amendments in force from 2020, more specific guidance has been included on “fitness for habitation”—see S52(1)(A).

  3. 3.

    Although the NSW RTA 2010 provides some guidance in stating that “reasonable standard of repair” means “having regard to the age of, rent payable for, and prospective life of the premises” (S63(2)). The requirement for smoke alarms is a notable exception to the general rule that RTAs stand back from explicitly defining “reasonable state of repair”.

References

  • Arnott, R. (1995). Time for revisionism on rent control? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, R. (2003). Swedish economic policy review (Vol. 10, pp. 89–121). Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, B. (2018, November 1). Ideas of home and ownership in Australia might explain the neglect of renters’ rights. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/ideas-of-home-and-ownership-in-australia-might-explain-the-neglect-of-renters-rights-104849.

  • Blackman, A. (2019, October 21). Berlin freezes rents in landmark plan to tackle cost spiral. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-18/berlin-government-reaches-deal-to-freeze-rents-for-5-years.

  • Blunden, H., & Martin, C. (2003). Leaking roofs: Australian tenancy law. A report by the National Association of Tenant Organisation. Sydney: Tenants’ Union of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbrook, A. J. (1975). Poverty and the residential landlord-tenant relationship. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service (AGPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbrook, A. J. (2003). Rented housing law: Past, present and future. Flinders Journal of Law Reform, 7(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T. (2012). The Australian residential housing market: Institutions and actors. In R. Tomlinson (Ed.), Australia’s Unintended Cities. Melbourne: CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choice, National Shelter and the National Association of Tenant Organizations. (2018). Disrupted: The consumer experience of renting in Australia. Marrickville, NSW: Choice. https://www.choice.com.au/-/media/cb55695ea54d4f928802aa78b1b9c60a.ashx?la=en.

  • Crook, T., & Kemp, P. A. (Eds.). (2014). Private rental housing: Comparative perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, T., Pawson, H., & Hulse, K. (2015a). Rooming house futures: Governing for growth, fairness and transparency, No. 245. Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, T., Hulse, K., & Pawson, H. (2015b). Rooming house futures: Governing for growth, transparency and fairness—Victorian Discussion Paper. Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferré-Sadurní, L., McKinley, J., & Wang, V. (2019, June 11). Landmark deal reached on rent protections for tenants in N.Y. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/11/rent-protection-regulation.html.

  • Goodman, R., Nelson, A., Dalton, T., Cigdem, M., Gabriel, M., & Jacobs, K. (2013). The experience of marginal rental housing in Australia, No. 210. Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffner, M., Hegedüs, J., & Knorr-Siedow, T. (2018). The private rental sector in Western Europe. In J. Hegedűs, M. Lux, & V. Horváth (Eds.), Private rental housing in transition countries: An alternative to owner occupation? London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse, K. Milligan, V., & Easthope, H. (2011). Secure occupancy in rental housing: Conceptual foundations and comparative perspectives, No. 170. Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse, K., & Milligan, V. (2014). Secure occupancy: A new framework for analysing security in rental housing. Housing Studies, 29(5), 638–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J., Propper, C., & Smith, S. (2008). The economics of social problems (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofner, S. (2014). The German housing system: Fundamentally resilient? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(2), 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofner, S. (2018). Appendix 1: Private rental housing in Germany. In C. Martin, K. Hulse, & H. Pawson (Eds.), The changing institutions of private rental housing: An international review, No. 292. Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2012). Tenants’ rights manual. Sydney: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. (2021). Australia’s incipient eviction crisis: No going back. Alternative Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X21990940.

  • Martin, C., Hulse, K., & Pawson, H. (2018). The changing institutions of private rental housing: An international review, No. 292. Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, G. (2018). Sand castles before the tide? Affordable housing in expensive cities. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(1), 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Shelter & NATO. (2010). A better lease on life: Improving Australian tenancy law. Canberra: National Shelter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, H., Dalton, T., & Hulse, K. (2015). Rooming house futures: Governing for growth, transparency and fairness—New South Wales Discussion Paper. Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, H., Parsell, C., Saunders, P., Hill, P., & Liu, E. (2018). Australian homelessness monitor 2018. Melbourne: Launch Housing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, H., & Martin, C. (2020). Rental property investment in disadvantaged areas: The means and motivations of Western Sydney’s new landlords. Housing Studies—Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1709806.

  • Pawson, H., Milligan, V., & Yates, J. (2020). Housing policy in Australia: A case for system reform. Singapore: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (2019). Vulnerable private renters: Evidence and options. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D., & Young, G. (2018). An evaluation of rent regulation measures within Scotland’s private rented sector. Edinburgh: Shelter Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • VCAT (Victoria Civil and Administrative Claims Tribunal). (2019). Annual Report 2018–19. Melbourne: VCAT. https://www.vcat.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/annual-report-2018-19.PDF. Accessed 26 Jan 2020.

  • Whitehead, C. (2012). The neo-liberal legacy to housing research. In D. Clapham, W. A. V. Clark, & K. Gibb, (Eds.), The sage handbook of housing studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C., Monk, S., Scanlon, K., Markkanen, S., & Tang, C. (2012). The private rented sector in the new century: A comparative approach. London: LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C., & Williams, P. (2018). Assessing the evidence on rent control: An international perspective. Manchester: Residential Landlords Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Morris .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morris, A., Hulse, K., Pawson, H. (2021). Private Rental in Australia: A Lightly Regulated Sector. In: The Private Rental Sector in Australia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6672-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6672-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6671-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6672-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics