Skip to main content

Evaluation of Federated Learning Strategies on Industrial Time Series Fault Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Distributed Computing and Machine Learning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 660))

  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) can enable industrial devices to collaboratively learn a shared Machine Learning (ML) model while keeping all the training data on the device itself. The FL inherently solves the data privacy issues where as it also reduces the cloud data hosting cost and communication overhead. However, existing FL algorithms and frameworks are generically designed and not evaluated against the industrial applications. In case of industrial applications, the data generated from assets and machines are mostly non-independent and Identically Distributed (non-IID) which demands for an investigation and evaluation on the existing FL algorithms against such non-IID industrial data. This paper presents a survey of FL frameworks, algorithms, and optimizers, and evaluates their performance against the industrial data. The paper shares the results of extensive numerical experiments conducted with the edge device, Raspberry pi. The data set used in this study is benchmarking fault classification industrial data, called PRONTO data set, for both IID and non-IID cases. With the experimental results, the paper demonstrates that the adaptive optimization-based FL algorithm, \(\texttt {FedAdam}\) outperforms other algorithms on an industrial time series fault classification application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ge Z, Song Z, Ding SX, Huang B (2017) Data mining and analytics in the process industry: the role of machine learning. IEEE Access 5:20 590–20 616

    Google Scholar 

  2. Candanedo IS, Nieves EH, Gonzalez SR, Martın MTS, Briones AG (2018) Machine learning predictive model for industry 4.0. In: Uden L, Hadzima B, Ting I-H (2018) Knowledge management in organizations. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 501–510

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagavathiappan S, Lahiri B, Saravanan T, Philip J, Jayakumar T (2013) Infrared thermography for condition monitoring-a review. Infrared Phys Technol 60:35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abt S, Baier H (2014) Are we missing labels? a study of the availability of ground-truth in network security research. In: 2014 third international workshop on building analysis datasets and gathering experience returns for security (BADGERS). IEEE, pp 40–55

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diez-Olivan A, Del Ser J, Galar D, Sierra B (2019) Data fusion and machine learning for industrial prognosis: trends and perspectives towards industry 4.0. Inf Fusion 50:92–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore ME, Ramage D, Hampson S, Arcas BAY (2017) Communication efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: -2017-Proceedings of the 20th international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics (AISTATS) 2017. PMLR, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, pp 1273–1282. Accessed from 20–22 Apr 2017

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang Q, Liu Y, Chen T, Tong Y (2019) Federated machine learning: concept and applications. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 10(2)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen V-D, Sharma SK, Vu TX, Chatzinotas S, Ottersten B (2021) Efficient federated learning algorithm for resource allocation in wireless IoT networks. IEEE Internet Things J 8(5):3394–3409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hiessl T, Rezapour Lakani S, Kemnitz J, Schall D, Schulte S (2021) Cohort-based federated learning services for industrial collaboration on the edge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu T-MH, Qi H, Brown M (2019) Measuring the effects of non-identical data distribution for federated visual classification. arXiv:1909.06335

  11. Reddi SJ, Charles Z, Zaheer M, Garrett Z, Rush K, Konecný J, Kumar S, McMahan HB (2021)Adaptive federated optimization. In: ICLR

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li T, Sanjabi M (2020) Fair resource allocation in federated learning. In: ICLR

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li Q, Diao Y, Chen Q, He B (2021) Federated learning on non-iid data silos: an experimental study. arXiv:2102.02079

  14. Aledhari M, Razzak R, Parizi RM, Saeed F (2020) Federated learning: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Access 8:140699–140725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kholod I, Yanaki E, Fomichev D, Shalugin E, Novikova E, Filippov E, Nordlund M (2020) Open-source federated learning frameworks for IoT: a comparative review and analysis. Sensors 21(1):167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. TensorFlow federated: machine learning on decentralized data. https://www.tensorflow.org/federated

  17. Flower Framework. https://flower.dev/

  18. Beutel DJ, Topal T, Mathur A, Qiu X, Parcollet T, Lane N (2020) Flower: a friendly federated learning research framework. vol. abs/ arXiv:2007.14390

  19. Mathur A, Beutel Pedro Porto Buarque de Gusmao DJ, Fernandez-Marques J, Topal T, Qiu X, Parcollet T, Gao Y, Lane ND (2021) On-device federated learning with flower. arXiv:2104.03042v1 [cs.LG]

  20. An industrial grade federated learning framework. https://fate.fedai.org

  21. let’s solve privacy. https://blog.openmined.org/tag/pysyft/

  22. Xaynet framework. https://www.xaynet.dev/

  23. PRONTO heterogeneous benchmark data set. https://zenodo.org/record/1341583#.Yl0r3NpBw2w

  24. Kairouz P, McMahan HB, Avent B, Bellet A, Bennis M, Bhagoji AN, Bonawitz K, Charles Z, Cormode G, Cummings R et al (2019) Advances and open problems in federated learning. arXiv:1912.04977

  25. https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sameer Chouksey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prathap Kumar, B., Chouksey, S., Amarlingam, M., Ashok, S. (2023). Evaluation of Federated Learning Strategies on Industrial Time Series Fault Classification. In: Chinara, S., Tripathy, A.K., Li, KC., Sahoo, J.P., Mishra, A.K. (eds) Advances in Distributed Computing and Machine Learning. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 660. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1203-2_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics