Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Distribution and hydraulic significance of large woody debris in a lowland Australian river

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The line-intersect technique was used to measure the loading of large woody debris in a 1.8 km reach of the Thomson River, Victoria (catchment area of 3540 km2). A debris census (measuring every item present) was done over 0.775 km of this reach. The transect technique over-estimated the actual loading revealed by the census. The loading of debris ≥0.01 m in diameter for the total 1.8 km reach was 0.0172 m3 m−2, which is higher than that measured in many headwater streams in other parts of the world. The volume loading of debris measured from low level aerial photographs was only 4.8% of the value estimated by the line-intersect technique. The line-intersect estimates were biased due to non-random orientation of debris in the stream (causing estimated errors of +8% for volume loading and +16% for surface area loading). It is recommended that to avoid this problem, when using the line-intersect transect technique in lowland rivers, each line should comprise at least two obliquely-angled transects across the channel. The mean item of debris (≥0.1 m in diameter) had a trunk basal diameter of 0.45 m, a length of 7.4 m, and volume of 0.7 m3. The riparian trees and the in-channel debris were of similar dimensions. The debris tended to be close to the bed and banks and was oriented downstream by the flow at a median angle of 27°. Because of this orientation, most debris had a small projected cross-sectional area, with the median value being only 1 m2. Thus, the blockage ratio (proportion of projected area of debris to channel cross-sectional area) was also low, ranging from 0.0002 to 0.1, with a median value of 0.004. The average item of debris, which occupied only 0.4% of the cross-section, would have minimal influence on banktop flow hydraulics, but the largest items, which occupied around 10%, could be significant. Judicious re-introduction of debris into previously cleared rivers is unlikely to result in a large loss of conveyance, or a detectable increase in flooding frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. & A. K. Morison, 1988. A study of the native fish habitat in the Goulburn River, Shepparton — impact of a proposal to operate a paddle steamer. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 68. Department of Conservation and Environment, Heidelberg, Victoria, 99 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrus, C. W., B. A. Long,& H. A. Froehlich, 1988. Woody debris and its contribution to pool formation in a coastal stream 50 years after logging. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 45: 2080–2086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke, A. C., T. C. Van Arsdall, D. M. Gillespe & F. K. Parrish, 1984. Invertebrate productivity in a subtropical backwater river: the importance of habitat and life history. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 25–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke, A. C. & J. B. Wallace, 1990. Wood dynamics in Coastal Plain blackwater streams. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 92–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilby, R. E., 1981. Role of organic debris dams in regulating the export of dissolved and particulate matter from a forested watershed. Ecology 62: 1234–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilby, R. E. & G. E. Likens, 1980. Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology 61: 1107–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, P. A., R. E. Bilby, M. A. Bryant, A. A. Dolloff, G. B. Grette, R. A. House, M. L. Murphy, K. V. Koski & J. R. Sedell, 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest, past, present and future. In E. O. Salo & T. W. Cundy (eds), Streamside Management, Forestry and Fishery Interactions, Contribution No. 57. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Institute of Forest Resources, Seattle: 143–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchardt, D., 1993. Effects of flow and refugia on drift loss of benthic macroinvertebrates: implications for habitat restoration in lowland streams. Freshwat. Biol. 29: 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, J. & R. L. Beschta, 1989. Coarse woody debris and channel morphology: a flume study. Wat. Resour. Bull. 25: 1031–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudney, M. D. & J. B. Wallace, 1980. Life cycles, micro-distribution and production dynamics of six species of net-spinning caddisflies in a large southeastern (USA) river. Holarct. Ecol. 3: 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, P. G., 1974. Multi-stage line intersect sampling. For. Sci. 20: 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, U. & B. Statzner, 1990. Time scales for the recovery potential of river communities after restoration, lessons to be learned from smaller streams. Reg. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 5: 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gippel, C. J., 1995. Environmental hydraulics of large woody debris in streams and rivers. J. env. Eng. 121: 388–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gippel, C. J., B. L. Finlayson & I. C. O'Neill, 1991. The hydraulic basis of snag management. In International Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Perth, 1–4 October. Nat. Conf. Publ. No. 91/22 Vol. 2. Institution of Engineers Australia, Canberra: 610–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gippel, C. J., I. C. O'Neill & B. L. Finlayson, 1992. The Hydraulic Basis of Snag Management. Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology, Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 116 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gippel, C. J., I. C. O'Neill, B. L. Finlayson & I. Schnatz, 1994. Hydraulic guidelines for the re-introduction and management of large woody debris in degraded lowland rivers. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics, August 18–20, The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim: 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gippel, C. J. & M. J. Stewardson, 1995. Development of an environmental flow management strategy for the Thomson River, Victoria, Australia. Reg. Rivers: Res. Mgmt. 11.

  • Gore, J. A., 1985. Mechanisms of colonization and habitat enhancement for benthic macroinvertebrates in restored river channels. In J. A. Gore (ed.), The Restoration of Rivers and Streams. Theories and Experience, Butterworth, Boston: 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, W. L., 1980. Riparian management, a flood control perspective. J. soil war. Cons. 35: 158–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, M. E., J. F. Franklin, F. J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S. V. Gregory, J. D. Lattin, N. H. Anderson, S. P. Cline, N. G. Aumen, J. R. Sedell, G. W. Lienkaemper, K. Cromack Jr. & K. W. Cummins, 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. ecol. Res. 15: 133–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. L., 1987. The influence of large organic debris on channel recovery in the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia, Canada. In Erosion and Sedimentation in the Pacific Rim, Proceedings of the Corvallis Symposium. IAHS Publ. No. 165: 343–353.

  • House, R. A. & P. L. Boehne, 1985. Evaluation of instream enhancement structures for salmonid spawning and rearing in a coastal Oregon stream. N. am. J. fish. Mgmt. 5: 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. A. & F. J. Swanson, 1979. Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth surf. Proc. 4: 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. A., A. MacDonald, T. Tally & N. J. Merritt, 1985. Effects of large organic debris on channel morphology and sediment storage in selected tributaries of Redwood Creek. In Geomorphic Processes and Aquatic Habitat in the Redwood Creek Drainage Basin. United States Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1454, U.S.G.S., U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knighton, A. D., 1984. Fluvial Forms and Processes. Edward Arnold, London, 218 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, J. D.& W. G. O'Connor, 1990. Biological Information for Management of Native Freshwater Fish in Victoria. Department of Conservation and Environment, Freshwater Fish Management Branch, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research. Victorian Government Printing Office, Melbourne, 165 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. W., 1991. Draft Fish Management Plan. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra, ACT, 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienkaemper, G. W. & F. J. Swanson, 1986. Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Can. J. for. Res. 17: 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisle, T. E., 1981. Roughness elements, a key resource to improve anadromous fish habitat. In T. J. Hassler (ed.), Proceedings of a Symposium on Propagation, Enhancement, and Rehabilitation of Anadromous Salmonid Populations and Habitat in the Pacific Northwest. Humboldt State University, Arcata, California: 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C., 1988. Either Drought or Plenty: Water Development and Management in New South Wales. Department of Water Resources New South Wales, Kangaroo Press, Sydney, 311 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, L. N., K. F. Walker & T. J. Hillman, 1991. Environmental significance of snags in the River Murray. Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation. Australian Water Research Advisory Council Completion Report, Project 85/45 (unpublished).

  • Long, B. A., 1987. Recruitment and abundance of large woody debris in an Oregon coastal stream system. M. Sc. thesis, Oregon State University, Oregon, (unpublished), 68 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzolf, G. R., 1978. The potential effects of clearing and snagging on stream ecosystems. FWS/OBS-78–14, U. S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Stream Alteration Team, Washington, DC, 31 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, M. P., 1981. The influence of organic debris on channel morphology and bedload transport in a New Zealand forest stream. Earth surf. Proc. Land. 6: 571–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Darling Basin Commission (no date). Working Group Report to Catchment, Floodplain and River Management Committee on Desnagging Hume to Yarrawonga. Report. M.D.B.C., Canberra, A.C.T. (unpublished).

  • O'Connor, N. A., 1991. The effect of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonising wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia 85: 504–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, N. A., 1992. Quantification of submerged wood in a lowland Australian stream system. Freshwat. Biol. 27: 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Jr., R. C., B. L. Madsen, M. A. Wilzbach, C. H. D. Magadza, A. Paarlberg, A. Kullberg & K. W. Cummins, 1987. Stream management, emerging global similarities. Ambio 16: 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddoch, A. F. & A. K. Milston, 1953. Flood mitigation in New South Wales. J. Inst. Eng. Austr. 25: 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K. S., 1982. Rivers: Form and Process in Alluvial Channels. Methuen, New York, 361 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, E. G., 1988. Large woody debris and channel morphology of undisturbed streams in southeast Alaska. M. Sc. thesis, Oregon State University, Oregon, (unpublished), 136 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, E. G. & R. L. Beschta, 1990. Coarse woody debris and channel morphology interactions for undisturbed streams in southeast Alaska, U. S. A. Earth surf. Proc. Land. 14: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedell, J. R. & J. L. Froggatt, 1984. Importance of streamside forests to large rivers: the isolation of the Willamette River, Oregon, U. S. A., from its floodplain by snagging and streamside forest removal. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 1828–1834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedell, J. R., R. J. Steedman, H. A. Regier & S. V. Gregory, 1991. Restoration of human impacted land-water ecotones. In M M. Holland, P. G. Risser & R. J. Naiman (eds), Ecotones: the Role of Landscape Boundaries in the Management and Restoration of Changing Environments, Chapman and Hall, London: 110–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr. & C. J. Gippel, 1995. Prediction of effects of woody debris removal on flow resistance. J. hydraul. Eng. 121: 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr. & N. R. Nunnally, 1984. Environmental aspects of clearing and snagging. J. envr. Eng. 110: 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr. & R. H. Smith, 1992. Effects of large woody debris removal on physical characteristics of a sand-bed river. Aquat. Cons. mar. freshwat. Ecosys. 2: 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Australian Government, 1986. Report of the Interdepartmental River Murray Dredging and Desnagging Committee. Engineering and Water Supply Department, Adelaide, SA, 62 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, H. G., 1962. River Improvement and Drainage in Australia and New Zealand. State Rivers and Water Supply Commission, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, S. & K. O'Hare, 1980. Instream habitat improvement devices and their use in freshwater fisheries management, J. envir. Mgmt. 10: 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F. J., M. D. Bryant, G. W. Lienkaemper & J. R. Sedell, 1984. Organic debris in small streams. Prince of Wales Island, Southeast Alaska. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-166. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F. J. & G. W. Lienkaemper, 1978. Physical consequences of large organic debris in Pacific Northwest streams. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-69. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. J. & J. S. Barclay, 1985. Renovation of a Plains State stream — physical problem solving. In Riparian Ecosystems and their Management, Reconciling Conflicting Uses. First North American Riparian Conference, Tucson, Arizona. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-120. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon: 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. M. 1995. The effects of large organic debris on sediment processes and stream morphology in Vermont. Geomorphology 11: 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triska, F. J., 1984. Role of wood debris in modifying channel geomorphology and riparian areas of a large lowland river under pristine conditions, a historical case study. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 1876–1892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triska, F. J. & K. Cromack, 1980. The role of wood debris in forests and streams. In Waring, R. H. (ed.), Forests: Fresh Perspectives from Ecosystem Analysis. Proc. 40th Biology Colloquium (1979), Oregon State University Press, Corvallis: 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wagner, C. E., 1968. The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. For. Sci. 14: 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. B. & A. C. Benke, 1984. Quantification of wood habitat in subtropical Coastal Plain streams. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 41: 1643–1652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. M. & N. G. Aumen, 1986. Woody debris as a source of fine particulate organic matter in coniferous forest stream ecosystems. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 43: 1635–1642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesche, T. A., 1985. Stream channel modifications and reclamation structures to enhance fish habitat. In J. E. Gore (ed.), The Restoration of Rivers and Streams: Theories and Experience. Butterworth, Boston: 103–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, D. W. & R. W. Bachman, 1976. A study of the effects of stream channelization and bank stabilization on warmwater sport fish in Iowa; subproject No. 4. The effects of long-reach channelization on habitat and invertebrate drift in some Iowa streams. Report No. FWS/OBS-76/14, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Environmental Applied Hydrology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3052, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Christopher J. Gippel, Brian L. Finlayson & Ian C. O'Neill

Authors
  1. Christopher J. Gippel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian L. Finlayson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ian C. O'Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gippel, C.J., Finlayson, B.L. & O'Neill, I.C. Distribution and hydraulic significance of large woody debris in a lowland Australian river. Hydrobiologia 318, 179–194 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016679

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016679

Key words

Search

Navigation