Skip to main content
Log in

Instructional design for meaningful learning

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The instructional design and student learning literature is reviewed for guidelines for instruction which would encourage deep rather than surface learning. A taxonomy is presented which values student conceptions of key phenomena and skills for the self-discovery of knowledge as more important than the accumulation of information. Strategy elements suggested for the selection and sequencing of content, therefore, focus on revealing the interrelationship between key concepts. Evidence is presented of the persistent nature of existing conceptions and the difficulty of changing conceptual frameworks. Diagnostic questions are suggested as a means of exposing existing conceptions. It then seems necessary to provide a challenge to revealed or anticipated misconceptions so that students pass through a disequilibrium phase before re-forming their existing conceptions. As there is growing evidence of a mis-match between the goals and practice of teachers, action research is suggested as a method of implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Govemment Department of Employment, Education and Training (1987). Policy discussion paper on higher education. Canberra: Australian Govemment Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • AusubelD. P. (1960). The use of advance organisers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • AusubelD. P. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • AusubelD. P. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: a reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48, 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • BairdJ. R. (1988). Quality: what should make higher education “higher'”?Higher Education Research and Development, 7 (2), 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • BairdJ. R. and MitchellI. J. (Eds.) (1986). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: an Australian case study — the PEEL project. Melboume: Monash University Printery.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarnesB. R. and ClawsonE. U. (1975). Do advance organizers facilitate learning? Recommendations for further research based on an analysis of 32 studies. Review of Educational Research, 45, 637–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • BarronR. F. (1969). The use of vocabulary as an advance organizer. In H. L.Herber and P. L.Sanders (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: first year report. Syracuse University: Reading and Language Arts Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • BiggsJ. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • BiggsJ. B. and TelferR. (1987). The process of learning. Sydney: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • BowdenJ. (1988). Achieving change in teaching practices. In P.Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A. (1989). Curriculum development for conceptual change learning: a phenomenographic pedagogy. Paper presented to the sixth annual conference of the Hong Kong Educational Research Association, Hong Kong, November.

  • BowdenJ. A. (Ed.) (1986). Student learning: research into practice. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CarrW. and KemmisS. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. Brighton, Sussex: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChampagneA. B., GunstoneR. F. and KlopferL. E. (1985). Effecting changes in cognitive structure among physics students. In L. H. T.West and A. L.Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChampagneA. B., KlopferL. E., DeSenaA. T. and SquiresD. A. (1981). Structural representations of students' knowledge before and after science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • ClydeA., CrowtherM., PatchingW., PuttI. and StoreR. (1983). How students use distance teaching materials: an institutional case study. Distance Education, 4 (1), 4–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, L. O. (1978). Qualitative differences in conceptions of basic principles in economics. Paper read to the 4th International Conference on Higher Education at Lancaster, August/September.

  • DahlgrenL. O. (1984). Outcomes of learning. In F.Marton, D.Hounsell and N.Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DriverR. and EricksonG. (1983). Theories-in-action: some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. and Oldham, V. (1985). A constructivist approach to curriculum in science. Paper prepared for the Symposium ‘Personal Construction of Meaning in Educational Settings’, British Educational Research Association, Sheffield, August.

  • EizenbergN. (1986). Applying student learning research to practice. In J. A.Bowden (Ed.), Student learning: research into practice, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EntwistleN. J. and PercyK. A. (1971). Educational objectives and student performance within the binary system. In C. F.Page and J.Gibson (Eds.), Research into Higher Education, 1970. London: SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • EntwistleN. J. and PercyK. A. (1974). Critical thinking or conformity? An investigation of the aims and objectives of higher education. In C. F.Page and J.Gibson (Eds.), Research into Higher Education, 1973. London: SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • EntwistleN. J. and RamsdenP. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • GagnéR. M. (1968). Learning hierarchies. Educational Psychologist, 6, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • GowL. and KemberD. (1990). Does higher education promote independent learning?Higher Education, 19, 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • GunstoneR. F. and WhiteR. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65, 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • HabermasJ. (1974). Theory and practice. Translated by J. Viertel. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • HalldénO. (1986). Learning history. Oxford Review of Education, 12, 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • HawkP., McLeodN. P. and JonassenD. H. (1985). Graphic organisers in texts, courseware and supplemental material. In D. H.Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text: principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text. (Vol. 2). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • HelmH. and NovakJ. D. (1983). Misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • HoltzH. (1989). Action in place of silence: a response to Gimenez. Teaching Sociology, 17, 192–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • HounsellD. J. (1984). Learning and essay-writing. In F.Marton, D.Hounsell and N.Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JonassenD. H. (1985). Generative learning vs. mathemagenic control of text processing. In D. H.Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text: principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text (Vol. 2). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • KemberD. and GowL. (1989). A model of student approaches to learning encompassing ways to influence and change approaches. Instructional Science, 18, 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • KemberD. and GowL. (1991). A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • KemmisS. and McTaggartR. (Eds). (1987). The action research reader. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LawtonJ. T. and WanskaS. K. (1977). Advance organizers as a teaching strategy: a reply to Bames and Clawson. Review of Educational Research, 47, 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • LewinK. (1952). Group decision and social change. In G. E.Swanson, T. M.Newcomb and F. E.Hartley (Eds), Readings in social psychology. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • LochheadJ. (1985). New horizons in educational development. In E. W.Gordon (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 12. Washington, DC: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • LuitenJ., AmesW. and AckersonG. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effects of advance organizers on learning and retention. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • LybeckL., MartonF., StrömdahlM. and TullbergA. (1988). The phenomenography of the ‘mole concept’ in chemistry. In P.Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: new perspectives. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • MartonF. (1981). Phenomenography — describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • MartonF. (1986). Some reflections on the improvement of learning. In J. A.Bowden (Ed.)Student learning: research into practice. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MartonF. (1988). Phenomenography: exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. M.Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: the silent scientific revolution. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1989). The nature and development of competence. Paper presented to the sixth annual conference of the Hong Kong Educational Research Association, Hong Kong, November.

  • MartonF. and SäljöR. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process II. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • MartonF., and WenestamC.-G. (1978). Qualitative differences in the understanding and retention of the main point in some texts based on the principle-example structure. In M. M.Gruneberg, P. E.Morris and R. N.Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MartonF., HounsellD. and EntwistleN. (Eds.) (1984). The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MayerR. E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning?Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermottL. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, 37, July, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • MeltonR. (1984). Alternative forms of preliminary organizer: overview. In E.Henderson and M.Nathenson (Eds.), Independent learning in higher education. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • MerrillM. D., LiZ. and JonesM. K. (1990). Limitations of first generation instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(1), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • MooreD. W. and ReadenceJ. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • MorrisA. and Stewart-DoreN. (1984). Learning to learn from text: effective reading in the content areas. North Ryde, NSW: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • NewbleD. and ClarkeR. (1987). Approaches to learning in a traditional and an innovative medical school. In J. T. E.Richardson, M. W.Eysenk and D. W.Piper (Eds.), Student learning: research in education and cognitive psychology. Milton Keynes: SRHE and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NovakJ. D. and GowinD. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NussbaumJ. and NovickS. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • OsborneR. J. and WittrockM. C. (1983). Learning science: a generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • PercyK. A. and SalterF. W. (1976). Student and staff perceptions and “the pursuit of excellence” in British higher education. Higher Education, 5, 457–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • PerryW. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • PerryW. G. (1988). Different worlds in the same classroom. In P.Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: new perspectives. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • PfundtH. and DruitR. (1985). Bibliography: students' alternative frameworks and science education. Kiel, West Germany: Institut für die Pädogogik der Naturwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • RamsdenP. (1986). Students and quality. In G. C.Moodie (Ed.), Standards and criteria in higher education. Guildford: SRHE and NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • RamsdenP. (1987). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: the case for a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 12(3), 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • RamsdenP. (Ed.) (1988). Improving learning: new perspectives. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • RamsdenP. and EntwistleN. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReigeluthC. M. (1979). In search of a better way to organise instruction: the elaboration theory. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(3), 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReigeluthC. M. (1983a). Instructional design theories and models: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReigeluthC. M. (1983b). Instructional design: what is it and why is it? In C. M.Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReigeluthC. M. (1989). Educational technology at the crossroads: new mindsets and new directions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(1), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReigeluthC. M. and SteinF. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C. M.Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • ReigeluthC. M., MerrillM. D., WilsonB. G. and SpillerR. T. (1980). The elaboration theory of instruction: a model for sequencing and synthesizing instruction. Instructional Science, 9, 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • RicheyR. (1986). The theoretical and conceptual bases of instructional design. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • RothK. and AndersonC. (1988). Promoting conceptual change learning from science textbooks. In P.Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: new perspectives. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchuellT. J. (1986) Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShawB. and TaylorJ. C. (1984). Instructional design, distance education and academic tradition. Distance Education, 5(2), 277–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, J. J. (1989). Quality in engineering education. Engineering Professors' Conference Occasional Papers, No. 1.

  • StenhouseL. (1975). Introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • StrikeK. and PosnerG. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T.West and A. L.Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ThomasP. R. and BainJ. D. (1984). Contextual differences of learning approaches: the effects of assessments. Human Learning, 3, 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • WatkinsD. and HattieJ. (1981). The learning processes of Australian university students: investigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 384–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • WatkinsD. and HattieJ. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learning, 4, 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • WattsM. and BentleyD. (1987). Constructivism in the classroom: enabling conceptual change by words and deeds. British Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenestam, C.-G. (1978). Horisontalisering [Horizontalization]. Ett satt att missuppfatta det man laser. Rapporter från Pedagogiska Institutionen, Goteborgs universitet, nr 157.

  • WestL. (1986). Phenomenography and the Marysville meeting. In J. A.Bowden (Ed.), Student learning: research into practice. Melbourne: Melbourne University.

    Google Scholar 

  • WestL. (1988). Implications of recent research for improving secondary school science learning. In P.Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: new perspectives. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • WestL. H. T. and PinesA. L. (Eds.) (1985). Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WestL. H. T., FenshamP. J. and GarrardJ. E. (1985). Describing the cognitive structures of learners following instruction in chemistry. In L. H. T.West and A. L.Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WhiteB. and HorwitzP. (1988). Computer microworlds and conceptual change: a new approach to science education. In P.Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: new perspectives. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kember, D. Instructional design for meaningful learning. Instr Sci 20, 289–310 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043255

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043255

Keywords

Navigation