Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental study of nonlinear dynamic system identification

  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A technique for robust identification of nonlinear dynamic systems is developed and illustrated using both digital simulations and analog experiments. The technique is based on the Minimum Model Error optimal estimation approach. A detailed literature review is included in which fundamental differences between the current approach and previous work is described. The most significant feature of the current work is the ability to identify nonlinear dynamic systems without prior assumptions regarding the form of the nonlinearities, in contrast to existing nonlinear identification approaches which usually require detailed assumptions of the nonlinearities. The example illustrations indicate that the method is robust with respect to prior ignorance of the model, and with respect to measurement noise, measurement frequency, and measurement record length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson J. M. T. and H. B. Stewart,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, John Wiley and Sons, Great Britain, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nayfeh A. H. and D. T. Mook,Nonlinear Oscillations, Wiley, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Natke, H. G., J.-N. Juang, and W. Gawronski,Identification of Nonlinear Mechanical Systems: A Brief Review, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, U.S.A.

  4. Jedner, U. and H. Unbehauen, ‘Identification of a class of nonlinear systems by parameter estimation of a linear multi-model’, inIMACS, Modeling and Simulation for Control of Lumped and Distributed Parameter Systems, June 3–6, 1986, pp. 11–15.

  5. Ibanez P., ‘Identification of dynamic parameters of linear and non-linear structural models from experimental data’,Nuclear Engineering and Design 25, 1973, 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yasuda K., S. Kawamura, and K. Watanabe, ‘Identification of nonlinear multi-degree-of-freedom systems (identification under noisy measurements)’,JSME International Journal 3, 1988, 502–509.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yasuda K., S. Kawamura, and K. Watanabe, ‘Identification of nonlinear multi-degree-of-freedom systems (presentation of an identification technique)’,JSME International Journal 3, 1988, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Billings S. A. and W. S. F. Voon, ‘A prediction-error and stepwise regression estimation algorithm for nonlinear systems’,Int. J. Control 44, 1986, 803–822.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greblick W. and M. Pawlak, ‘Hammerstein system identification by non-parametric regression estimation’,Int. J. Control 45, 1987, 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kortmann, M. and H. Unbehauen, ‘Application of a recursive prediction error method to the identification of nonlinear systems using the Wiener model’,IMACS, Modeling and Simulation for Control of Lumped and Distributed Parameter Systems, June 3–6, 1986, pp. 3–9.

  11. Distefano N. and A. Rath, ‘System identification in nonlinear seismic dynamics’,Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 5, 1975, 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Broersen P. M. T., ‘Estimation of parameters of non-linear dynamical systems’,Int. J. Non-Linear Mechanics 9, 1974, 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hanagud S. V., M. Meyyappa, and J. I. Craig, ‘Method of multiple scales and identification of nonlinear dynamical systems’,AAIA J. 23, 1985, 802–807.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marmarelis P. Z. and F. E. Udwadia, ‘The identification of building structural systems—Part II: The nonlinear case’,Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 66, 1979, 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen H., N. Ishii, and N. Suzumura, ‘Structural classification of non-linear systems by input and output’,Int. J. Systems Sci. 17, 1986, 741–774.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang M. L. and R. Y. Chang, ‘Model reduction and control system design by shifted Legendre polynomial functions’,ASME J. Dynam. Sys. Meas. Control 105, 1983, 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horn I.-R. and J.-H. Chou, ‘Analysis and identification of non-linear systems via shifted Jacobi series’,Int. J. Control 45, 1987, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yun C.-B. and M. Shinozuka, ‘Identification of nonlinear structural dynamic systems’,J. Struct. Mech. 8, 1980, 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hammond, J. K., H. R. Lo, and E. J. Seager-Smith, ‘Identification of nonlinearities in vibrating systems using optimal control techniques’,IMAC, 1987, 1467–1473.

  20. Mook D. J. and J. L. Junkins, ‘Minimum model error estimation for poorly modeled dynamic systems’,AIAA J.G.N.C. 11, 1988, 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mook D. J., ‘Estimation and identification of nonlinear dynamic systems’,AIAA J. 27, 1989, 968–974.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geering H. P., ‘Continuous time optimal control theory for cost functionals including discrete state penalty terms’,IEEE Trans. A.C. AC-21, 1976, 860–869.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mook D. J. and J.-H. Lew, ‘Multiple shooting algorithms for jump-discontinuous problems in optimal control and estimation’,IEEE Trans. A.C. 36 (8), 1990, 979–983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stry, G.I., Mook, D.J. An experimental study of nonlinear dynamic system identification. Nonlinear Dyn 3, 1–11 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045467

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045467

Key words

Navigation