Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian inference for the power law process

  • Bayesian Procedures
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The power law process has been used to model reliability growth, software reliability and the failure times of repairable systems. This article reviews and further develops Bayesian inference for such a process. The Bayesian approach provides a unified methodology for dealing with both time and failure truncated data. As well as looking at the posterior densities of the parameters of the power law process, inference for the expected number of failures and the probability of no failures in some given time interval is discussed. Aspects of the prediction problem are examined. The results are illustrated with two data examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ascher, H. (1981). Weibull distribution vs. Weibull process, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE, 426–431, Chicago, IL.

  • Ascher, H. and Feingold, H. (1984). Repairable Systems Reliability, Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, L. J. (1978). Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life-Testing Models, Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Tiao, G. C. (1973). Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabria, R., Guida, M. and Pulcini, G. (1988). Some modified maximum likelihood estimators for the Weibull process, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 23, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabria, R., Guida, M. and Pulcini, G. (1990). Bayes estimation of prediction intervals for a power law process, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 19, 3023–3035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, L. H. (1974). Reliability analysis for complex repairable systems, Reliability and Biometry (eds. F. Proschan and D. J. Serfling), 379–410, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, L. H. (1975). Tracking reliability growth, Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference on Design of Experiments, ARO Rep. 75, 741–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, L. H. (1982). Confidence interval procedures for the Weibull process with applications to reliability growth, Technometrics, 24, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duane, J. T. (1964). Learning curve approach to reliability monitoring, IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Systems, 2, 563–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, M. and Bain, L. J. (1978). Prediction intervals for the Weibull process, Technometrics, 20, 167–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, M. and Bain, L. J. (1986). On the mean time between failures for repairable systems, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R 35, 419–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser, S. (1986). Predictive analysis, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 7, 158–170, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. (1965). Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guida, M., Calabria, R. and Pulcini, G. (1989). Bayes inference for a non-homogeneous Poisson process with power intensity law, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R 38, 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyparisis, J. and Singpurwalla, N. D. (1985). Bayesian inference for the Weibull process with applications to assessing software reliability growth and predicting software failures, Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Symposium on the Interface (ed. L. Billard), 57–64, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North Holland), Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. and Lee, K. (1978). Some results on inference for the Weibull process, Technometrics, 20, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1984). Inference on a future reliability parameter with the Weibull process model, Naval Res. Logist. Quart., 31, 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musa, J. D. (1979). Software Reliability Data, deposited in IEEE Computer Society Repository, New York.

  • Rigdon, S. E. and Basu, A. P. (1989). The power law process: a model for the reliability of repairable systems, Journal of Quality Technology, 21, 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singpurwalla, N. D. (1988). An interactive PC-based procedure for reliability assessment incorporating expert opinion and survival data, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Bar-Lev, S.K., Lavi, I. & Reiser, B. Bayesian inference for the power law process. Ann Inst Stat Math 44, 623–639 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053394

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053394

Key words and phrases

Navigation