Abstract
The power law process has been used to model reliability growth, software reliability and the failure times of repairable systems. This article reviews and further develops Bayesian inference for such a process. The Bayesian approach provides a unified methodology for dealing with both time and failure truncated data. As well as looking at the posterior densities of the parameters of the power law process, inference for the expected number of failures and the probability of no failures in some given time interval is discussed. Aspects of the prediction problem are examined. The results are illustrated with two data examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ascher, H. (1981). Weibull distribution vs. Weibull process, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE, 426–431, Chicago, IL.
Ascher, H. and Feingold, H. (1984). Repairable Systems Reliability, Dekker, New York.
Bain, L. J. (1978). Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life-Testing Models, Dekker, New York.
Box, G. E. P. and Tiao, G. C. (1973). Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
Calabria, R., Guida, M. and Pulcini, G. (1988). Some modified maximum likelihood estimators for the Weibull process, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 23, 51–58.
Calabria, R., Guida, M. and Pulcini, G. (1990). Bayes estimation of prediction intervals for a power law process, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods, 19, 3023–3035.
Crow, L. H. (1974). Reliability analysis for complex repairable systems, Reliability and Biometry (eds. F. Proschan and D. J. Serfling), 379–410, SIAM, Philadelphia.
Crow, L. H. (1975). Tracking reliability growth, Proceedings of the Twentieth Conference on Design of Experiments, ARO Rep. 75, 741–754.
Crow, L. H. (1982). Confidence interval procedures for the Weibull process with applications to reliability growth, Technometrics, 24, 67–72.
Duane, J. T. (1964). Learning curve approach to reliability monitoring, IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Systems, 2, 563–566.
Engelhardt, M. and Bain, L. J. (1978). Prediction intervals for the Weibull process, Technometrics, 20, 167–169.
Engelhardt, M. and Bain, L. J. (1986). On the mean time between failures for repairable systems, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R 35, 419–422.
Geisser, S. (1986). Predictive analysis, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 7, 158–170, Wiley, New York.
Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. (1965). Tables of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, New York.
Guida, M., Calabria, R. and Pulcini, G. (1989). Bayes inference for a non-homogeneous Poisson process with power intensity law, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R 38, 603–609.
Kyparisis, J. and Singpurwalla, N. D. (1985). Bayesian inference for the Weibull process with applications to assessing software reliability growth and predicting software failures, Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Symposium on the Interface (ed. L. Billard), 57–64, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North Holland), Amsterdam.
Lee, L. and Lee, K. (1978). Some results on inference for the Weibull process, Technometrics, 20, 41–45.
Miller, G. (1984). Inference on a future reliability parameter with the Weibull process model, Naval Res. Logist. Quart., 31, 91–96.
Musa, J. D. (1979). Software Reliability Data, deposited in IEEE Computer Society Repository, New York.
Rigdon, S. E. and Basu, A. P. (1989). The power law process: a model for the reliability of repairable systems, Journal of Quality Technology, 21, 251–260.
Singpurwalla, N. D. (1988). An interactive PC-based procedure for reliability assessment incorporating expert opinion and survival data, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83, 43–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Bar-Lev, S.K., Lavi, I. & Reiser, B. Bayesian inference for the power law process. Ann Inst Stat Math 44, 623–639 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053394
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053394