Abstract
Expansion of agriculture into new regions has often been followed by land degradation. In this article, it is argued that the process of land development involves the selection of pioneer's with optimistic expectations about the robustness and carrying capacity of new land. Hence, there is a systematic bias towards overexploitation and land degradation. The argument is shown to be an extension of the winner's curse analysis in the theory of auctions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ciriacy-Wantrup, Siegfried and R., Bishop. (1975). “‘Common Property’ as a Concept in Natural Resource Policy,”Nautral Resource Journal 15, 713–727.
Coase, Ronald. (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost,”Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–4.
Demsetz, Harold. (1967). “Towards a Theory of Property Rights,”American Economic Review 57, 347–359.
Graham, Daniel. (1981). “Cost-Benefit Analysis under Uncertainty”,American Economic Review 71, 715–725.
Hardin, Garrett. (1968). “The Tragedy of the Commons”,Science 162,.
Jodha, N. (1985). “Common Property Resource in Farming in Arid and Semi-arid Tropical India”. Presented to the 29th Australian Agricultural Economics Society Conference, Armidale, February.
Levins, Michael. (1990). “Farmers who Solve Equations”,Choices 2, 60–65.
Milgrom, Paul. (1989). “Auctions and Bidding: A Primer”,Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 3–22.
Mirrlees, James. (1974). “Notes on Welfare Economics, Information and Uncertainty”. In M., Balch, D., McFadden, and S., Wu (eds),Essays on Economic Behavior under Uncertainty. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Smith, V.K. (1987). “Uncertainty, Benefit-Cost Analysis and the Treatment of Option Value”,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14, 283–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quiggin, J. The pioneer's curse: Selection bias and agricultural land degradation. J Risk Uncertainty 5, 241–246 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057880
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057880