Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological responses to nutrient availability in four clonal herbs

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines morphological plasticity of clonal plants of contrasting habitats and of contrasting architectures in response to nutrient supply. The hypotheses were tested that plants from rich habitats possess greater plasticity in response to variation in resource supply than species from poor habitats, and that rhizomatous species are less plastic in their response than stoloniferous species. Two sympodial rhizomatous herbs (Carex flacca, C. hirta) and two monopodial stoloniferous herbs (Trifolium fragiferum, T. repens) were subjected to four levels of nutrient supply in a garden experiment. One of the two species of each genus (C. hirta, T. repens) is from fertile and the other from infertile habitats. We measured 1) whole plant characters: total plant dry weight, number of modules (product of a single apical meristem) and number of ramets; 2) ramet characters: ramet leaf area and ramet height; and 3) spacer characters: branches per module, length per module and length per module internode.

All measured characters in the Trifolium species significantly responded to treatment: the values for all measured characters increased with higher levels of fertilization. The differences in plant characters between fertilization levels were larger in Trifolium repens than in T. fragiferum in terms of whole plant characters, ramet characters and stolon internode length. The two Carex species did not differ in their responses to treatment in terms of most characters measured. In ramet characters and in some whole plant characters the species from fertile habitats were more plastic than those from infertile habitats. In spacer characters this pattern was not found. Foraging could not be demonstrated unequivocally.

Morphological plasticity in the stoloniferous (Trifolium) species was much larger than in the rhizomatous (Carex) species. This seems in accordance with a foremost storage function of rhizomes, as against a foremost explorative function of stolons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, A.D. 1984. Dynamic morphology: a contribution to plant population ecology. pp. 48–56. In: Dirzo, E. & Sarukhan, J. (eds), Perspectives in plant population ecology. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.D. 1991. Plant form: an illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.D. & Tomlinson, P.B. 1980. Adaptive architecture in rhizomatous plants. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 125–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A.D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13: 115–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, J.J. 1983. Biological flora of the british isles: Trifolium repens L. Journal of Ecology 71: 307–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M.L. 1994. Consequences of foraging in clonal plant species. Ecology 75: 933–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caradus, J.R., Hay, M.J.M., Mackay, A.D., Thomas, V.J., Dunlop, J., Lambert, M.G., Hart, A.L., van denBosch, J. & Wewala, S. 1993. Variation within white clover (Trifolium repens L.) for phenotypic plasticity of morphological and yield related characters, induced by phosphorus supply. The New Phytologist 123: 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B.A. & Callaghan, T.V. 1990. Programmed tiller differentiation, intraclonal density regulation and nutrient dynamics in Carex bigelowii. Oikos 58: 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B.A., Jonsdottir, I.S., Svensson, B.M. & Callaghan, T.V. 1990. Aspects of clonality in the arctic: a comparison between Lycopodium annotinum and Carex bigelowii. pp. 131–151. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R.E. 1985. Growth and development in clonal plant population. pp. 259–296. In: Jackson, J.B.C., Buss, L.W. & Cook, R.E. (eds), Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, J.C. & Grime, J.P. 1987. Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology. The New Phytologist 107: 403–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • deKroon, H. & Hutchings, M.J. 1995. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: The foraging concept reconsidered. Journal of Ecology 83: 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • deKroon, H. & Knops, J. 1990. Habitat exploration through morphological plasticity in two chalk grassland perennials. Oikos 59: 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • deKroon, H. & Schieving, F. 1990. Resource partitioning in relation to clonal growth strategy. pp. 113–130. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • deKroon, H. & vanGroenendael, J. 1990. Regulation and function of clonal growth in plants: an evaluation. pp. 177–186. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M. 1993. Morphological plasticity of the clonal herb Lamiastrum galeobdolon (L.) Ehrend. & Polatschek in response to partial shading. The New Phytologist 124: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M. 1995. Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modification due to physiological integration. Oecologia 101: 282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M. & deKroon, H. 1994. Plasticity in morphology and biomass allocation in Cynodon dactylon, a grass species forming stolons and rhizomes. Oikos 70: 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M. & Pierdominici, M.G. 1994. Morphology and growth of stolons and rhizomes in three clonal grasses, as affected by different light supply. Vegetatio 116: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.P. 1992. The effect of local resource availability and clonal integration on ramet functional morphology in Hydrocotyle bonariensis. Oecologia 89: 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P., Crick, J.C. & Rincon, J.E. 1986. The ecological significance of plasticity. pp. 5–29. In: Jennings, D.H. and Trewavas, A.J. (eds), Plasticity in plants. Biologists Limited, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. & Hunt, R. 1988. Comparative plant ecology. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, M.J. & deKroon, H. 1994. Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 159–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, M.J. & Mogie, M. 1990. The spatial structure of clonal plants: control and consequences. pp. 57–76. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: Regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, M.J. & Slade, A.J. 1988. Morphological plasticity, foraging and integration in clonal perennial herbs. pp. 83–109. In: Davy, A.J., Hutchings, M.J. & Watkinson, A.R. (eds), Plant population ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerling, L. 1988. Clone dynamics, population dynamics and vegetation pattern of Glaux maritima on a Baltic sea shore meadow. Vegetatio 74: 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landolt, E. 1977. Ökologische Zeigerwerte zur Schweizer Flora. Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der Eidg. Techn. Hochschule, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich. Vol. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, R.R.B. 1981. Adaptive biology of vegetatively regenerating weeds. Advances in Applied Biology 6: 57–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, P.H. & Lovell, P.J. 1985. The importance of plant form as a determining factor in competition and habitat exploitation. pp. 209–221. In: White, J.(ed), Studies on plant demography. Academic Press Inc., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogie, M. & Hutchings, M.J. 1990. Phylogeny, ontogeny and clonal growth in vascular plants. pp. 3–22. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer, E. 1970. Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora für Süddeutschland. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oborny, B. 1994. Growth rules in clonal plants and environmental predictability: A simulation study. Journal of Ecology 82: 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1985. SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers Version 6 Edition. SAS institute Inc., Cary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, S.S. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 35–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, C.D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 667–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, C.D. & Levin, D.A. 1984. Phenotypic plasticity of annual Phlox: Tests of some hypotheses. American Journal of Botany 71: 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B. 1986. Spatial dynamics and integration within clones of grassland perennials with different growth form. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B 228: 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B. & Bazzaz, F.A. 1992. Growth responses of rhizomatous plants to fertilizer application and interference. Oikos 65: 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, A.J. & Hutchings, M.J. 1987a. The effect of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. Journal of Ecology 75: 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, A.J. & Hutchings, M.J. 1987b. The effect of light intensity on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. Journal of Ecology 75: 639–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, W.J. & Stillman, R.A. 1988. The foraging tactics of plants. Oikos 52: 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.J. 1956. Biological flora: Carex flacca Schreb. Journal of Ecology 44: 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. 1993. The influence of natural canopy density on the growth of white clover, Trifolium repens. Oikos 67: 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. 1987. Genetic constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. pp. 47–71 in: Loeschke, V. (ed.), Genetic constraints on adaptive evolution. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, D.M. & Steingraeber, D.A. 1985. Branching and modular growth: theoretical models and empirical patterns. pp. 225–257. In: Jackson, B.C., Buss, L.W. & Cook, R.E. (eds), Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. 1979. The plant as metapopulation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 109–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, M. & Heller, D. 1984. The genus Trifolium. Ahva Printing Press, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong, M., During, H.J. & Werger, M.J.A. Morphological responses to nutrient availability in four clonal herbs. Vegetatio 123, 183–192 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118270

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118270

Key words

Navigation