Abstract
This paper examines morphological plasticity of clonal plants of contrasting habitats and of contrasting architectures in response to nutrient supply. The hypotheses were tested that plants from rich habitats possess greater plasticity in response to variation in resource supply than species from poor habitats, and that rhizomatous species are less plastic in their response than stoloniferous species. Two sympodial rhizomatous herbs (Carex flacca, C. hirta) and two monopodial stoloniferous herbs (Trifolium fragiferum, T. repens) were subjected to four levels of nutrient supply in a garden experiment. One of the two species of each genus (C. hirta, T. repens) is from fertile and the other from infertile habitats. We measured 1) whole plant characters: total plant dry weight, number of modules (product of a single apical meristem) and number of ramets; 2) ramet characters: ramet leaf area and ramet height; and 3) spacer characters: branches per module, length per module and length per module internode.
All measured characters in the Trifolium species significantly responded to treatment: the values for all measured characters increased with higher levels of fertilization. The differences in plant characters between fertilization levels were larger in Trifolium repens than in T. fragiferum in terms of whole plant characters, ramet characters and stolon internode length. The two Carex species did not differ in their responses to treatment in terms of most characters measured. In ramet characters and in some whole plant characters the species from fertile habitats were more plastic than those from infertile habitats. In spacer characters this pattern was not found. Foraging could not be demonstrated unequivocally.
Morphological plasticity in the stoloniferous (Trifolium) species was much larger than in the rhizomatous (Carex) species. This seems in accordance with a foremost storage function of rhizomes, as against a foremost explorative function of stolons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, A.D. 1984. Dynamic morphology: a contribution to plant population ecology. pp. 48–56. In: Dirzo, E. & Sarukhan, J. (eds), Perspectives in plant population ecology. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer.
Bell, A.D. 1991. Plant form: an illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology. Oxford University Press, New York.
Bell, A.D. & Tomlinson, P.B. 1980. Adaptive architecture in rhizomatous plants. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 125–160.
Bradshaw, A.D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13: 115–156.
Burdon, J.J. 1983. Biological flora of the british isles: Trifolium repens L. Journal of Ecology 71: 307–330.
Cain, M.L. 1994. Consequences of foraging in clonal plant species. Ecology 75: 933–944.
Caradus, J.R., Hay, M.J.M., Mackay, A.D., Thomas, V.J., Dunlop, J., Lambert, M.G., Hart, A.L., van denBosch, J. & Wewala, S. 1993. Variation within white clover (Trifolium repens L.) for phenotypic plasticity of morphological and yield related characters, induced by phosphorus supply. The New Phytologist 123: 175–184.
Carlsson, B.A. & Callaghan, T.V. 1990. Programmed tiller differentiation, intraclonal density regulation and nutrient dynamics in Carex bigelowii. Oikos 58: 219–230.
Carlsson, B.A., Jonsdottir, I.S., Svensson, B.M. & Callaghan, T.V. 1990. Aspects of clonality in the arctic: a comparison between Lycopodium annotinum and Carex bigelowii. pp. 131–151. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Cook, R.E. 1985. Growth and development in clonal plant population. pp. 259–296. In: Jackson, J.B.C., Buss, L.W. & Cook, R.E. (eds), Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Crick, J.C. & Grime, J.P. 1987. Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology. The New Phytologist 107: 403–414.
deKroon, H. & Hutchings, M.J. 1995. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: The foraging concept reconsidered. Journal of Ecology 83: 143–152.
deKroon, H. & Knops, J. 1990. Habitat exploration through morphological plasticity in two chalk grassland perennials. Oikos 59: 39–49.
deKroon, H. & Schieving, F. 1990. Resource partitioning in relation to clonal growth strategy. pp. 113–130. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
deKroon, H. & vanGroenendael, J. 1990. Regulation and function of clonal growth in plants: an evaluation. pp. 177–186. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Dong, M. 1993. Morphological plasticity of the clonal herb Lamiastrum galeobdolon (L.) Ehrend. & Polatschek in response to partial shading. The New Phytologist 124: 291–300.
Dong, M. 1995. Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modification due to physiological integration. Oecologia 101: 282–288.
Dong, M. & deKroon, H. 1994. Plasticity in morphology and biomass allocation in Cynodon dactylon, a grass species forming stolons and rhizomes. Oikos 70: 99–106.
Dong, M. & Pierdominici, M.G. 1994. Morphology and growth of stolons and rhizomes in three clonal grasses, as affected by different light supply. Vegetatio 116: 25–32.
Evans, J.P. 1992. The effect of local resource availability and clonal integration on ramet functional morphology in Hydrocotyle bonariensis. Oecologia 89: 265–276.
Grime, J.P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Grime, J.P., Crick, J.C. & Rincon, J.E. 1986. The ecological significance of plasticity. pp. 5–29. In: Jennings, D.H. and Trewavas, A.J. (eds), Plasticity in plants. Biologists Limited, Cambridge.
Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. & Hunt, R. 1988. Comparative plant ecology. Unwin Hyman, London.
Hutchings, M.J. & deKroon, H. 1994. Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 159–238.
Hutchings, M.J. & Mogie, M. 1990. The spatial structure of clonal plants: control and consequences. pp. 57–76. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: Regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Hutchings, M.J. & Slade, A.J. 1988. Morphological plasticity, foraging and integration in clonal perennial herbs. pp. 83–109. In: Davy, A.J., Hutchings, M.J. & Watkinson, A.R. (eds), Plant population ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Jerling, L. 1988. Clone dynamics, population dynamics and vegetation pattern of Glaux maritima on a Baltic sea shore meadow. Vegetatio 74: 171–185.
Landolt, E. 1977. Ökologische Zeigerwerte zur Schweizer Flora. Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der Eidg. Techn. Hochschule, Stiftung Rübel, Zürich. Vol. 64.
Leakey, R.R.B. 1981. Adaptive biology of vegetatively regenerating weeds. Advances in Applied Biology 6: 57–90.
Lovell, P.H. & Lovell, P.J. 1985. The importance of plant form as a determining factor in competition and habitat exploitation. pp. 209–221. In: White, J.(ed), Studies on plant demography. Academic Press Inc., London.
Mogie, M. & Hutchings, M.J. 1990. Phylogeny, ontogeny and clonal growth in vascular plants. pp. 3–22. In: vanGroenendael, J. & deKroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Oberdorfer, E. 1970. Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora für Süddeutschland. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
Oborny, B. 1994. Growth rules in clonal plants and environmental predictability: A simulation study. Journal of Ecology 82: 341–351.
SAS. 1985. SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers Version 6 Edition. SAS institute Inc., Cary.
Scheiner, S.S. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 35–68.
Schlichting, C.D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 667–693.
Schlichting, C.D. & Levin, D.A. 1984. Phenotypic plasticity of annual Phlox: Tests of some hypotheses. American Journal of Botany 71: 252–260.
Schmid, B. 1986. Spatial dynamics and integration within clones of grassland perennials with different growth form. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B 228: 173–186.
Schmid, B. & Bazzaz, F.A. 1992. Growth responses of rhizomatous plants to fertilizer application and interference. Oikos 65: 13–24.
Slade, A.J. & Hutchings, M.J. 1987a. The effect of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. Journal of Ecology 75: 95–112.
Slade, A.J. & Hutchings, M.J. 1987b. The effect of light intensity on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. Journal of Ecology 75: 639–650.
Sutherland, W.J. & Stillman, R.A. 1988. The foraging tactics of plants. Oikos 52: 239–244.
Taylor, F.J. 1956. Biological flora: Carex flacca Schreb. Journal of Ecology 44: 281–290.
Thompson, L. 1993. The influence of natural canopy density on the growth of white clover, Trifolium repens. Oikos 67: 321–324.
Via, S. 1987. Genetic constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. pp. 47–71 in: Loeschke, V. (ed.), Genetic constraints on adaptive evolution. Springer, Berlin.
Waller, D.M. & Steingraeber, D.A. 1985. Branching and modular growth: theoretical models and empirical patterns. pp. 225–257. In: Jackson, B.C., Buss, L.W. & Cook, R.E. (eds), Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven.
White, J. 1979. The plant as metapopulation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 109–145.
Zohary, M. & Heller, D. 1984. The genus Trifolium. Ahva Printing Press, Jerusalem.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, M., During, H.J. & Werger, M.J.A. Morphological responses to nutrient availability in four clonal herbs. Vegetatio 123, 183–192 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118270
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118270