Abstract
A linear model for neutral surface-layer flow over complex terrain is presented. The spectral approach in the two horizontal coordinates and the finite-difference method in the vertical combines the simplicity and computational efficiency of linear methods with flexibility for closure schemes of finite-difference methods. This model makes it possible to make high-resolution computations for an arbitrary distribution of surface roughness and topography. Mixing-length closure as well as E − ε closure are applied to two-dimensional flow above sinusoidal variations in surface roughness, the step-in-roughness problem, and to two-dimensional flow over simple sinusoidal topography. The main difference between the two closure schemes is found in the shear-stress results. E − ε has a more realistic description of the memory effects in length and velocity scales when the surface conditions change. Comparison between three-dimensional model calculations and field data from Askervein hill shows that in the outer layer, the advection effects in the shear stress itself are also important. In this layer, an extra equation for the shear stress is needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonia, R. A. and Luxton, R. E.: 1971, ‘The Response of a Turbulent Boundary Layer to a Step Change in Surface Roughness. Part 1. Smooth to Rough’, J. Fluid Mech. 48, 721–761.
Beljaars, A. C. M., Schotanus, P., and Nieuwstadt, F. T. M.: 1983, ‘Surface Layer Similarity under Nonuniform Fetch Conditions’, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 22, 1800–1810.
Bradley, E. F.: 1968, ‘A Micrometeorological Study of Velocity Profiles and Surface Drag in the Region Modified by a Change in Surface Roughness’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 361–379.
Caneill, J. Y., Buty, D., and Saab, A. E.: 1985, Sensitivity Studies Related to Turbulence Parameterizations for Numerical Simulations of Mesoscale Flows over Complex Terrain, Seventh Symp. Turb. Diff., Amer. Meteorol. Soc., November 12–15, Boulder, Co.
Detering, H. W. and Etling, D.: 1985, ‘Application of the E − ε Turbulence Closure Model to the Atmospheric Boundary Layer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 33, 113–133.
Durst, F., Launder, B. E., Schmidt, F. W., and Whitelaw, J. H.: 1979, Turbulent Shear Flows I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 415 pp.
Hunt, J. C. R. and Simpson, J. E.: 1982, ‘Atmospheric Boundary Layers over Non-Homogeneous Terrain’, in E. J. Plate (ed.), Engineering Meteorology, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Jackson, N. A.: 1976, ‘The Propagation of Modified Flow Downstream of a Change in Roughness’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 102, 924–933.
Jackson, P. S. and Hunt, J. C. R.: 1975, ‘Turbulent Wind Flow over a Low Hill’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 101, 929–955.
Launder, B. E.: 1975, Progress in the Modelling of Turbulent Transport, Lecture notes presented at the von Kármán Institute, Rhode-St.-Genese, Belgium, March 3–7.
Lumley, J. L. and Khajeh-Nouri, B.: 1974, ‘Computational Modelling of Turbulent Transport’, Adv. Geophys. 18A, 169–192.
Mason, P. J. and Sykes, R. I.: 1979, ‘Flow over an Isolated Hill of Moderate Slope’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 105, 383–395.
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1974, ‘A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers’, J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1791–1806.
Mellor, G. L. and Yamada, T.: 1982, ‘Development of a Turbulence Closure Model for Geophysical Fluid Problems’, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 851–875.
Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. and Van Dop, H. (eds.): 1982, Atmospheric Turbulence and Air Pollution Modelling, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland.
Panofsky, H. A. and Dutton, J. A.: 1984, Atmospheric Turbulence: Models and Methods for Engineering Applications, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Panofsky, H. A. and Townsend, A. A.: 1964, ‘Change of Terrain Roughness and the Wind Profile’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 147–155.
Peterson, E. W.: 1969a, ‘On the Relation Between the Shear Stress and the Velocity Profile After a Change in Surface Roughness’, J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 773–774.
Peterson, E. W.: 1969b, ‘Modification of Mean Flow and Turbulent Energy by Change in Roughness Under Conditions of Neutral Stability’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 561–575.
Raithby, G. D. and Stubley, G. D.: 1985, Prediction and Comparison with Experiment of Three-Dimensional Flow over the Askervein Hill, Rep. Thermal Science Ltd., Waterloo, Ont., Canada.
Rao, K. S., Wyngaard, J. C., and Coté, O. R.: 1974, ‘The Structure of the Two-Dimensional Internal Boundary Layer over a Sudden Change of Surface Roughness’, J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 738–746.
Richards, K. J.: 1980, ‘The Formation of Ripples and Dunes on an Erodible Bed’, J. Fluid Mech. 99, 597–618.
Rodi, W.: 1980, Turbulence Models and Their Applications in Hydraulics: A State-of-the-Art Review, Inst. für Hydromechanik, Univ. of Karlsruhe, Germany.
Shir, C. C.: 1972, ‘A Numerical Computation of Air Flow over a Sudden Change of Surface Roughness’, J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 304–310.
Taylor, P. A.: 1969, ‘On Wind and Shear Stress Profiles Above a Change in Surface Roughness’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 95, 77–91.
Taylor, P. A.: 1978, A Note on Velocity and Turbulent Energy Profiles in the Surface Layer with Particular Reference to the Numerical Modelling of Turbulent Boundary-Layer Flow Above Horizontally Inhomogeneous Terrain, Internal Rep. ARQL 4/78, Atmos. Environ. Service, Downsview, Ont., Canada, 36 pp.
Taylor, P. A.: 1980, ‘Some Recent Results from a Numerical Model of Surface Boundary-Layer Flow over Hills’, in J. C. Wyngaard (ed.), Workshop on the Planetary Boundary Layer, Amer. Meteorol. Soc., Boston, pp. 150–157.
Taylor, P. A. and Teunissen, H. W.: 1985, The Askervein Hill Project: Report on the September/October 1983 Main Field Experiment, Internal Rep. MSRB-84–6, Atmos. Environ. Service, Downsview, Ont., Canada.
Taylor, P. A., Mason, P. J., and Bradley, E. F.: 1985, Boundary Layer Flow over Low Hills —A Review of Recent Field Experiments, Seventh Symp. Turb. Diff., Amer. Meteorol. Soc., November 12–15, Boulder, Co.
Taylor, P. A., Walmsley, J. L., and Salmon, J. R.: 1983, ‘A Simple Model of Neutrally Stratified Boundary Layer Flow over Real Terrain Incorporating Wavenumber-Dependent Scaling’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 26, 169–189.
Townsend, A. A.: 1965, ‘The Response of a Turbulent Boundary Layer to Abrupt Changes in Surface Conditions’, J. Fluid Mech. 22, 799–822.
Townsend, A. A.: 1966, ‘The Flow in a Turbulent Boundary Layer After a Change in Surface Roughness’, J. Fluid Mech. 26, 255–266.
Townsend, A. A.: 1972, ‘Flow in a Deep Turbulent Boundary Layer over a Surface Distorted by Water Waves’, J. Fluid Mech. 55, 719–735.
Walmsley, J. L. and Salmon, J. R.: 1984, A Boundary-Layer Model for Wind Flow over Hills: Comparison of Model Results with Askervein '83 Data, Proc. European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, Hamburg, October 1984.
Walmsley, J. L., Salmon, J. R., and Taylor, P. A.: 1982, ‘On the Application of a Model of Boundary-Layer Flow over Low Hills to Real Terrain’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 23, 17–46.
Walmsley, J. L., Taylor, P. A., and Keith, T.: 1986, ‘A Simple Model of Neutrally Stratified Boundary-Layer Flow over Complex Terrain with Surface Roughness Modulations (MS3DJH/3R)’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 36, 157–186.
Zeman, O.: 1981, ‘Progress in the Modelling of Planetary Boundary Layers’, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 253–272.
Zeman, O. and Jensen, N. O.: 1985, Response of the Reynolds Stress Tensor to the Mean Flow Distortion over a Two-Dimensional Hill, Seventh Symp. Turb. Diff., Amer. Meteorol. Soc., November 12–15, Boulder, Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beljaars, A.C.M., Walmsley, J.L. & Taylor, P.A. A mixed spectral finite-difference model for neutrally stratified boundary-layer flow over roughness changes and topography. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 38, 273–303 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122448
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122448