Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a practical model of cognitive/information processing task analysis and schema acquisition for complex problem-solving situations

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 3-step strategy is proposed for cognitive/information processing task analysis which may lead to practical procedures for task analysis and instructional design. The three steps are: (1) concept hierarchy analysis, (2) analysis of example sets to teach relations among concepts, and (3) analysis of problem sets to build a progressively larger schema for the problem space. The strategy avoids extremely detailed information flow analysis performed in much descriptive research on human information processing. The research basis of the strategy is outlined by offering a descriptive model of human performance which identifies four dimensions: (1) Knowledge System, (2) Cognitive/Information Processing System, (3) Physiological System, and (4) Motivational/ Emotional System. The Knowledge Dimension is analyzed as consisting of problem-solving tasks, because of the basic cognitive process of perception. Problem-solving is structured by expectancies, which are in turn structured by schemata. Hence, the strategy proposed for task analysis focuses on identifying the structure of the schema underlying a problem space. Implications of the strategy for design of instruction to teach the schema are discussed. Contrasts are drawn with conventional (Gagné-style) methods. Examples from aviation training are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T. W., Rose, A. M. and Kramer, L. J. (1978). “An Information Processing Approach to Performance Assessment: III. An Elaboration and Refinement of an Information Processing Performance Battery.” American Institutes for Research, Technical Report No. 3.

  • Alluisi, E. A. (1967). “Methodology in the use of synthetic tasks to assess complex performance,” Human Factors 9 (4): 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1980). “Concepts, Propositions, and Schemata: What are the Cognitive Units?” Technical Report 80-2. Department of Psychology, Carnegie-Mellon University.

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. C., Engelmann, S. and Thomas, D. R. (1975). Teaching 2: Cognitive Learning and Instruction. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, D. G. and Norman, D. A. (1975). “Some principles of memory schemata,” in D. G. Bobrow and A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockhold, Jr., G. and Roth, D. R. (1978). “Performance Measurement System for Training Simulators.” General Physics Corporation, Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI NP-783, Project 769, Interim Report.

  • Braune, R. J. (1982) “Towards an Internal Model in Pilot Training.” Unpublished Master's Thesis. Savoy, Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Bromage, B. K. and Mayer, R. E. (1981). “Relationship between what is remembered and creative problem-solving performance in science learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology 73 (4): 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G. and Simon, H. A. (1973). “Perception in chess,” Cognitive Psychology 4: 55–81, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R. and Rees, E. (1981). “Expertise in Problem Solving.” Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Technical Report No. 5.

  • Chiles, W. D. (1967). “Assessment of complex operator performance,” Human Factors 9 (4): 325–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. C. (1971). “Teaching concepts in the classroom: A set of teaching prescriptions derived from experimental research,” Journal of Educational Psychology 62 (3): 253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. A. (1980). “Recent themes in visual information processing: A selected overview,” in R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance VII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A. D. (1966). “Perception and memory versus thought: Some old ideas and recent findings,” in B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.) Problem Solving. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, Jr., P. B., Eschenbrenner, Jr., A. J. and Ruck, H. W. (1980). “Task analysis handbook.” AFHRL-TR-79–45 (II). Brooks AFB, TX: Manpower and Personnel Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, July 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. and Carey, L. (1978). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S. and Sprafka, S. A. (1978). Medical Problem Solving. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelman, S. (1969). Conceptual Learning. North Sioux Falls, SD: Adapt Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. W. (1982). “Computer-based instruction of expert problem solving procedures: Ensuring access to relevant knowledge structures,” in Conference Proceedings of ADCIS 1982. Bellingham, WA: Western Washington University Press, pp. 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M. and Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A. (1967). “Performance assessment based on an empirically derived task taxonomy,” Human Factors 9 (4): 349–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1977). The Conditions of Learning (3rd edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. P. (1979). “Cognitive/information processing psychology and instruction: Reviewing recent theory and practice,” Instructional Science 8: 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S. (1980). “Pre-development analysis in military training,” NSPI Journal Feb.: 34–42.

  • Hills, B. L. (1980). “Vision, visibility, and perception in driving,” Perception 9: 183–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, J. and Brooks, V. (1978). “The perception of motion pictures,” in E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of Perception. Vol. X. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. S. (1982). “Pilot judgment: Training and evaluation,” Human Factors, 24 (1): 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, E. (1781). Critique of Pure Reason (Kritik der wahren Vernunft), (1st ed. 1781, 2nd ed. 1787, translated by N. Kemp Smith). London: Macmillan, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. J., Wooldridge, L., Hennessy, R. T., Vreuls, D., Barnebey, S. F., Cotton, J. C. and Reed, J. C. (1979). “Air combat maneuvering performance measurement.” NAVTRAE-QUIPCEN IH-315/AFHRL-TR-79–3 Williams AFB, AZ: Flying Training Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. S., Carter, R. C. and Bittner, Jr., A. C. (1980). “A catalogue of performance evaluation tests for environmental research.” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 24th Annual Meeting, 1980.

  • Kintsch, W. and van Dijk, T. A.. “Toward a model of text comprehension and production,” Psychological Review 85: 363–394.

  • Kozminsky, E., Kintsch, W. and Bourne, Jr., L. E. (1981). “Decision making with texts: Information analysis and schema acquisition,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General: 110 (3): 363–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (1977). “Phenomenological Approach To Training.” AFHRL-TR-77–42. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Advanced Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, L. (1974). Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R. and Mackworth, N. H. (1978). “Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4 (4): 565–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, W. C. (1980). “Changes in instructional development: The aftermath of an information processing takeover in psychology,” Journal of Instructional Development 4 (2): 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1975). Preparing Instructional Objectives. Palo Alto, CA: Fearon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. and Tennyson, R. D. (1977). Teaching Concepts: An Instructional Design Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. M., Swink, J. R. and McKenzie, Jr., J. F. (1978). “Instructional system development (ISD) In air force flying training.” AFHRL-TR-78–59. Williams AFB, AZ.: Flying Training Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, December, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. A. (1975). “A framework for representing knowledge,” in P. H. Winston (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, T. (1978). Wittgenstein and Knowledge — The Importance of On Certainty. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourant, R. R. and Rockwell, T. H. (1972). “Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers,” Human Factors 14 (4): 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (1977). “Cognitive development and the acquisition of concepts,” in R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Jr., J. (1975). The Origins of Intellect — Piaget's Theory. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. M. (1974). “Human information processing: An assessment and research battery.” Human Performance Center Technical Report No. 46, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). “Notes on a schema for stories,” in D. G. Bobrow, and A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. and Ortony, A. (1977). “The representation of knowledge in memory,” in R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. and Norman, D. A. (1981). “Analogical processes in learning,” in J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., Lebowitz, M. and Birnbaum, L. A. (1978). “Integrated Partial Parsing.” Research Report No. 143, Yale Artificial Intelligence Project.

  • Sills, D. L., Wolf, C. P. and Shelanski, V. B. (1981). The Accident at Three Mile Island: The Human Dimension. Boulder, Co: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. and Barenfeld, M. (1969). “Information-processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving,” Psychological Review 76 (5): 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. K. (Translator) (1934). Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1st Edition). London: Macmillan and Co., Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J. (1980). “Schema Theory and Reading Comprehension: New Directions.” Technical Report No. 191. Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois.

  • Stoffer, G. R. (1981). “Performance measurement and the navy's Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS),” Proceedings of the Symposium on Aviation Psychology, The Aviation Psychology Laboratory, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

  • Tennyson, R. D. and Ok-Choon, Park (1980). “The teaching of concepts: A review of instructional design research literature,” Review of Educational Research 50 (1): 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. W. (1981). “Schema theory as a guide for educational research: White Knight Or White Elephant?” Invited Address presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Los Angeles, April 1981.

  • Tiemann, P. W. and Markle, S. M. (1978). Analyzing Instructional Content: A Guide to Instruction and Evaluation. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, M. D. (1955). “The functions of schemata in perceiving,” Psychological Review 62 (3): 180–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1982). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, E. L. and Curry, R. E. (1981). “Flight Deck Automation: Promises and Problems.” NASA Technical Memorandum 81206.

  • Young, A. W. and Deregowski, J. B. (1981). “Learning to see the impossible,’ Perception 10: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braune, R., Foshay, W.R. Towards a practical model of cognitive/information processing task analysis and schema acquisition for complex problem-solving situations. Instr Sci 12, 121–145 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122453

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122453

Keywords

Navigation