Skip to main content
Log in

Interest groups, campaign contributions, and probabilistic voting

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay develops a simple model to analyze the impact of campaign contributions on electoral-policy decisions of candidates for office. Interest groups here are firms that select contributions under the assumption that candidates' policies and opposing groups' donations remain unaltered. Candidates, however, recognize that their policy choices affect contributions. Campaign contributions are used by candidates to affect policy-oriented voters' perceptions of candidates' positions. In this framework the introduction of campaign contributions may affect candidates' electoral policies, and if they do then they benefit surely exactly one of the two interest groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamany, D. (1977). Money, politics and democracy: A review article. American Political Science Review 71: 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranson, P., and Hinich, M. (1979). Some aspects of the political economy of election campaign laws. Public Choice 34: 435–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranson, P., Hinich, M., and Ordeshook, P. (1974). Election goals and strategies: Equivalent and nonequivalent strategies. American Political Science Review 68: 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. (1981). Party policy and campaign costs in a multi-constituency model of electoral competition. Public Choice 37:389–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zion, U., and Eytan, Z. (1974). On money, votes and policy in a democratic society. Public Choice 17: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., and Magee, S. (1978). The economics of special interest groups: The case of the tariff. American Economic Review 68: 246–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, R. (1986). Models of imperfect information in politics. Mimeo. Washington University, St. Louis (forthcoming in Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J. (1978). A collective goods model of pluralist political systems. Public Choice 33: 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P. (1983). Pareto optimality of policy proposals with probabilistic voting. Public Choice 39: 427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P. (1984). Probabilistic voting. In S. Kotz, N. Johnson and C. Read, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Vol. 6. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, E. (1982). Politics and money. New Yorker, 6 and 13 December.

  • Enelow, J., and Hinich, M. (1984). The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1977). Oligopoly and the Theory of Games. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M. (1977). Equilibrium in spatial voting: The median voter is an artifact. Journal of Economic Theory 16: 208–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M. (1978). The mean vs. the median in spatial voting games. In P. Ordeshook (Ed.), Game Theory and Political Science. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M., Ledyard, P., and Ordeshook, P. (1972). Nonvoting and the existence of equilibrium under majority rule. Journal of Economic Theory 14: 144–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. (1980). Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 18: 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K. (1972). The strategy of ambiguity: Uncertainty and electoral competition. American Political Science Review 66: 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W. (1974). The economics of campaign funds. Public Choice 20: 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W. (1980). The allocation of political monies: Economic interest groups. Public Choice 35: 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this essay (titled ‘Interest Groups, Campaign Contributions and Spatial Voting’) was written while I was a Postdoctoral Fellow in Political Economy at GSIA, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. I am grateful to John Bone, Tom Palfrey, Tom Romer, two anonymous referees, and Peter Aranson for helping me clarify some of the issues here. They bear no responsibility for any remaining muddles, however.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Austen-Smith, D. Interest groups, campaign contributions, and probabilistic voting. Public Choice 54, 123–139 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123002

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123002

Keywords

Navigation