Skip to main content
Log in

Reflecting on “Reflective Practice”: Implications for teacher evaluation

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Altenbaugh, R.J. (1989). Teachers and professional excellence. In C.Shea, E.Kahane, & P.Sola (Eds.), The new servants of power: A critique of the 1980s reform movement. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S.B., Conley, S.C., & Shedd, J. (1987). A developmental framework evaluating teachers as decision makers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation, 1, 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, T. (1990). The school teacher's portfolio: An essay on possibilities. In J.Millman & L.Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi, J.S. (1991). Evaluating classroom instruction. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, C., Lanier, J., & Miskel, C. (1986). The Holmes Group report: Impetus for gaining professional status for teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift, R., Houston, W., & Pugach, M. (1990). Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and problems. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, S.C. (1988). Reforming paper pushers and avoiding free agents: The teacher as a constrained decision maker. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 394–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. & Clandinin, D. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910). How we think, Boston: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relations of reflective thinking to the educative process, 2nd rev. ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry, New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1976 [1903]). The relationship of thought and its subject matter. Reprinted in J.Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, vol. 2 (1902–1903). Carbonadale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D.M. (Ed.) (1984). Ethnography in educational evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbons, R. (1981). Making educational decisions: An introduction to philosophy of education. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosnot, C. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach to teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals. Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T.L. & Mulryan, C. (1990). Teacher ratings: A call for teacher control and self evaluation. In J.Millman & L.Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, D. & Stillman, P. (Eds.) (1987) Recaliming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change. Portsmouth, NH: Neinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. (1987). What is a reflective/analytic teacher? Draft manuscript, School of Education, The University of Connecticut (Mimeo).

  • Iwanicki, E. (1990). Teacher evaluation for school improvement. In J.Millman & L.Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park: CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our school. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killion, J. & Todnem, G. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (1989). Life in schools. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M.W. & Pfeifer, R.S. (1988) Teacher evaluation: Improvement, accountability, and effective learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1990). The evolution of reflective teaching and teacher education. In R.Clift, W.Houston, & M.Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and problems. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (1990). Programmatic structures for the preparation of the reflective practitioner. In R.Clift, W.Houston, & M.Pugach (Eds.) Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and problems. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1990). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, C. (1971). Crisis in the classroom. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirotnik, K.A. (1987). Evaluation in the ecology of schooling: The process of school renewal. In J.Goodlad (Ed.), The ecology of school renewal. Eighty-sixth yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (1992). Teacher's work and the politics of reflection. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 267–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks-Langer, G. & Colton, A. (1991). Synthesis of research on teacher's reflective thinking. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L., Chair, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanManen, J. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. & Liston, D. (1987). Teacher student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reagan, T., Case, K., Case, C.W. et al. Reflecting on “Reflective Practice”: Implications for teacher evaluation. J Pers Eval Educ 6, 263–277 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125152

Keywords

Navigation