Skip to main content
Log in

Performance indicators in higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest has been increasing in many countries in assessing performance of higher education institutions (and also departments within institutions). Two important reports in the U.K. in recent years have strongly advocated the use of performance indicators for this purpose. This paper argues that such indicators cannot be used in a meaningful way without a clear view of institutional goals. Problems of deriving such goal systems are discussed and a critical review of work done in this field is presented. Methodological problems associated with devising and using effective and useful performance indicators are described and research undertaken in this field outlined. Finally the authors outline the conditions under which they believe performance indicators may be used to give valid insights into performance of institutions (or departments).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Attiyeh, R. and Lumsden, K. (1971). “University Students Initial Understanding of Economics: The Contribution of A Level Economics Course and Other Factors”. Economica 38: (149): 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. (1971). Academic Gouvernance. McCutchen, Berkely, California, pp. 118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R. and Halwachi, J. (1985). “Higher Education Institutions in the Arab States: A study of Objectives and Achievements”. Research in Higher Education 23 (4): 339–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D., Calvert, J. and Sizer, J. (1977). “Case Study of Some Performance Indicators in Higher Education in the U.K.”. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education. 1 (2): 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, J. (1981). Workshop Report - Institutional Performance Assessment Under Conditions of Changing Need. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 5: 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. M., Hough, M. J. and Stewart, R. R (1984). “University Autonomy and Public Policies: A System Theory Perspective”. Higher Education 13: 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. and March, J. (1974) Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service (1972). Institutional Goals Inventory, Princeton, N.J.

  • Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern Organizations, Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Paper, “The Development of Higher Education into the 1990's”, HMSO (London), 1985.

  • Gross, E. and Grambsch, P. (1968) University Goal and Academic Power. American Council on Education, Washington, D.C. (1974) Changes in University Organisations 1964–1971. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarratt, A. et al. (1985). Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities. Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluczynski, J. (1980). “Objectives and Factors Determining Planning of Higher Education in a Socialist Society”. Higher Education in Europe 5 (1): 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, G. (1986). Times Higher Education Supplement, February 28th 1986, p. 15.

  • McKelvie, Brenda D. (1986). “The University's statement of goals”. Higher Education 15: 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, P. (1979). “Comparative Indicators for German Universities”. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 3: 155–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAB (1984). “A Strategy for Higher Education into the Late 1980s and Beyond”. London.

  • Norris, G. (1978). The Effective University: A Management by Objectives Approach. Saxon House, Farnborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. (1973). Goals for California Higher Education. A survey of 116 College Communities, Berkeley, Calif.

  • Richman, B. and Farmer, R. (1974). Leadership Goals and Power in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins Report, (1963). On Higher Education. Report of the Committee appointed by the Prime Minister under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins. HMSO London.

  • Romney, L. (1978). Measures of Institutional Goal Achievement. National Centre for Higher Education Management Systems, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, L., Bugen, G. and Micek, S. (1979). “Assessing Institutional Performance: The Importance of Being Careful”. European Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 3: (1): 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sear, K. (1983). Correlation between A Level Grades and Degree Results in England and Wales. Higher Education 12: 609–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H. L. (1973). “The University: its Graduates and the Labour Market. The social Responsibility of the University in Asian Countries”. IAU Paper 12, Paris, p. 53.

  • Sizer, J. (1979). “Assessing Institutional Performance - An Overview”. European Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 3: 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, J. (1986). Chiefs on the War Path. THES, March 28th 1986, p. 14.

  • THES (1986). Article “Performance Indicators to be Tested at End of this Year”. April 18th 1986.

  • UGC (1984). “A Strategy for Higher Education into the 1990s”. The University Grants Committee advice. HMSO, 1984.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ball, R., Halwachi, J. Performance indicators in higher education. High Educ 16, 393–405 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129112

Keywords

Navigation