Skip to main content
Log in

A macroscopic model of instruction and purposive learning: An overview

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a brief description of a model for purposeful learning and instruction. The learner is viewed as a resource-limited system that has to transform instructional information in order to be successful. The expected success of teaching depends on six factors. Two factors determine the likelihood of encountering relevant instructional information. These are: the number of redundant instructive events (I) and attendance to instruction and compliance with assignments (A-C). Three factors interact reciprocally to determine the likelihood of achieving the desired competence once the relevant instructional information has been encountered. These are: the straightforward relevance of instructive information (D), the learner's instruction-relevant experience (E) and disposition for appropriate mathemagenic process (m). Finally (R), properties of the material and of the situation, determine whether students will remember what they have learned. The instructional model, although based on relatively microscopic psychological theories, can be applied at progressively more macroscopic levels of analysis by increasing the size of instructional units, using more approximate measures and focusing on the success of larger groups of students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1963). “A model for school learning,” Teachers College Record 64: 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnischfeger, A. and Wiley, D. E. (1976). “The teaching-learning process in elementary schools: A synoptic view,” pp. 195–236, in Erickson, D. A. (Ed.), Readings in Educational Research: Educational Organization and Administration. American Educational Research Association. San Francisco: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, E. Z. (1965). “Some theoretical and experimental approaches to problems in written instruction,” pp. 193–221, in Krumboltz, J. D. (Ed.), Learning and the Educational Process, Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, E. Z. (1976). “Writing to teach and reading to learn: A perspective on the psychology of written instruction,” pp. 91–129, in Gage, N. L. (Ed.), The Psychology of Teaching Methods. 75th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Portions of this paper were read at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, Calif., April 11, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothkopf, E.Z. A macroscopic model of instruction and purposive learning: An overview. Instr Sci 10, 105–122 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132513

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132513

Keywords

Navigation