Skip to main content
Log in

Flexural and fatigue properties of a bone cement based upon polyethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is commonly used in surgery to fix joint replacements into the bone. Although the operations are generally successful, loosening of the prosthesis does occur with fracture of the bone cement treated as the source of failure in some instances. Polyethylmethacrylate (PEMA) bone cement offers a promising alternative to PMMA due to its high ductility, low toxicity and low exotherm. In addition, hydroxyapatite (HA) particles can be added, while retaining the ductile properties of the material. In this study, the flexural and fatigue properties of this experimental cement, with and without HA reinforcement, have been examined. It was found that up to 40wt.% HA could be added with increases in both flexural strength and modulus. Specimens were subjected to tensiontension cyclic loading at a number of stress levels until catastrophic failure occurred. In comparison with a commercial PMMA cement, tested at relatively high stresses, the PEMA cement failed at lower cycles to failure. However, the data converged at the lower stresses employed which are closer to the physiological loading situation. With the addition of HA, although the cycles to failure were decreased, the deformation experienced by the PEMA-HA cement whilst being cycled was reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. A. GRUEN, G. M. MCNEICE and H. C. AMSTUTZ, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 141 (1979) 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. P. KUSY J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 12 (1978) 271–305.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. C. AMSTUTZ and T. A. GRUEN, in “Current practice in orthopaedic surger,” edited by J. P. Ahstrom (The CV Mosby Company, St. Louis, 1973), pp. 158–182.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. M. PILLIAR, R. BLACKWELL, R. MACNAB and R. CAMERON, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 10 (1976) 893–906.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. SAHA and S. PAL, J. Biomechanics 17 (1984) 467–478.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. M. WRIGHT and P. S. TRENT, J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) 503–505.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. PEREK and R. M. PILLIAR, J. Mater. Sci. 3 (1992) 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. SOGAL and S. F. HULBERT, Bioceramics 5 (1992) 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. CASTALDINI and A. CAVALLINI, “Biological and Biomedical Performance of Biomaterials,” edited by P. Christel, A. Meunier and A. J. C. Lee. (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1986) pp. 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. S. LITSKY, R. M. ROSE, C. T. RUBIN and E. L. THRASHER, J. Orthop. Res. 8 (1990) 623–626.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. WEIGHTMAN, M. A. R. FREEMAN, P. A. REVELL, M. BRADEN, B. E. J. ALBREKTSSON and L. V. CARLSON, J. Bone Joint Surg. 69-B (1987) 558–564.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. W. M. DAVY and M. BRADEN, Biomaterials 12 (1991) 540–544.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. REVELL, M. GEORGE, M. BRADEN, M. FREEMAN and B. WEIGHTMAN, Biomaterials 3 (1992) 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. REVELL, M. BRADEN, B. WEIGHTMAN and M. A. R. FREEMAN, Clin. Mater. 10 (1992) 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. BEHIRI, M. BRADEN, S. N. KHORISANI, D. WIWATTANDATE and W. BONFIELD, Bioceramics 4 (1991) 301–304.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. KHORASANI, S. DEB, J. BEHIRI, M. BRADEN and W. BONFIELD, Bioceramics 5 (1992) 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM F451-86 American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA (1986).

  18. ISO 178: 1993(E), International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland (1993).

  19. BS 2782: Part 9: Method 931A British Standards Institution, London, UK, (1988).

  20. R. D. CROWNINSHIELD, R. A. BRAND, R. C. JOHNSTON and J. C. MILROY, J. Bone Joint Surg. 62-A (1980) 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. D. CROWNINSHIELD, R. A. BRAND, R. C. JOHNSTON and J. C. MILROY, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 146 (1980) 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. P. DAVIES, D. O. O'CONNER, D. W. BURKE, M. JASTY and W. D. HARRIS, Clin. Orthop. 229 (1988) 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. D. T. TOPOLESKI, P. DUCHEYNE and J. M. CUCKLER, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24 (1990) 135–154.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harper, E.J., Behiri, J.C. & Bonfield, W. Flexural and fatigue properties of a bone cement based upon polyethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 6, 799–803 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134320

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134320

Keywords

Navigation