Abstract
Though many educationists have repeatedly advocated small group teaching in higher education, there are few reports of the implementation of such teaching. The use of small groups has been widely recommended as a means of developing higher cognitive skills. The introduction of such activity requires a substantial reduction in the conventional program of lectures and tutorials. It would be difficult for a university lecturer wishing to introduce small group activity to find a range of descriptive case studies to use as a model. To provide such a model is the aim here.
In the case at hand, the lecture component of a senior undergraduate course in political theory taught by M. W. Jackson was substantially reduced and replaced by small group sessions. The strategies developed were systematically evaluated, mainly but not exclusively for formative purposes, by M. T. Prosser. In this article we describe the background, structure, and evaluation of this innovation, suggesting a number of problems that others may anticipate. We hope that this account will be of use to others in de-lecturing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abercrombie, MN. L. J. (1970).Aims and Techniques of Group Teaching. Guildford: SRHE.
Bates, A. J. (1981). “Towards a better research framework for evaluating the effectiveness of educational media,”British Journal of Educational Technology 12 (3): 215–233.
Bloom, B. S. (1972).Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. London: Longman.
Boud, D. J. and Lublin, J. (1983).Self Assessment in Professional Education. University of New South Wales, Sydney: T.E.R.C.
Boud, D. J. and Prosser, M. T. (1980). “Sharing responsibility: staff-student co-operation in learning,”British Journal of Educational Technology 11 (1): 24–35.
Gibbs, G. (n.d.)Learning to Study. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Hills, W. F. (1969).Learning Through Discussion. London: Sage.
Immerwahr, J. et al. (1983). “The Locke game,”Teaching Philosophy 6 (1): 31–39.
Miller, R. E. and Bositis, P. A. (1979). “Alternative teaching techniques,”Teaching Political Science 6 (3): 259–274.
Moss, G. D. and McMillen, D. (1980). “A strategy for developing problem-solving skills in large undergraduate classes,”Studies in Higher Education 5 (2): 161–171.
McCulloch, A. (1978). “Innovations in the classroom,”Teaching Political Science 6 (1): 67–87.
Parlett, M. and Hamilton, B. (1975). “Evaluation as illumination,” in D. Tawday (Ed.),Curriculum Evaluation Today: Trends and Implications. London: MacMillan.
Powell, J. P. (1973). “Small group teaching methods in higher education,”Educational Research 16: 163–171.
Prosser, M. T. and Thorley, N. R. (1981). “Towards student self-direction in a first-year undergraduate physics course,”European Journal of Science Education 3 (4): 413–421.
Prosser, M. T. (1984). “Towards more effective evaluation studies of educational media,”British Journal of Educational Technology 15 (1): 33–42.
Scheffler, I. (1973).Reason and Teaching. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Stenhouse, L. (1975).An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, M.W., Prosser, M.T. De-lecturing. A case study of the implementation of small group teaching. High Educ 14, 651–663 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136503
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136503