Abstract
Using the theoretical tools offered through the writings of Pierre Bourdieu, this paper develops a critique of constructivism. Constructivism has assumed a dominance with the field of mathematics education but, as an epistemology, it ignores the social implications of the construction of meaning. It is argued that constructivism is a liberal discourse which valorises the individual construction of meaning. In doing this, the social and political contexts in which mathematical knowledge is located is ignored and the marginalisation of many social and cultural groups is legitimated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernstein, B.: 1982, ‘Codes, modalities, and process of cultural reproduction’, in M.W. Apple (ed.), Cultural and Economic Reproduction in Education. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Bourdieu, P.: 1982, ‘The school as a conservative force: Scholastic and cultural inequalities’, in E. Bredo and W. Feinberg (eds.) Knowledge and Values in Social and Educational Research, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 391–407.
Bourdieu, P.: 1983, ‘The forms of capital’, in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood press, New York.
Bourdieu, P.: 1985, ‘The social space and genesis of groups’, Social Science Information, 24(2), 195–220.
Bourdieu, P.: 1992, ‘Thinking about limits’, Theory, Culture and Society 9, 37–49.
Brice-Heath, S.: 1983, Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., and Yackel, E.: 1992, ‘Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers’, in R.B. Davis, C.A. Maher, and N. Noddings (eds.), Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp. 125–146.
Confrey, J.: 1991, ‘Learning to listen: A student's understanding of powers of ten’, in E. v. Glasersfeld (ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 111–138.
Ellerton, N. and Clements, M.A.: 1992. ‘Some pluses and minuses of radical constructivism in mathematics education’, in B. Southwell, B. Perry, and K. Owens (eds.), Space—The first and final frontier, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sidney, pp. 261–275.
Ellerton, N.F. and Clements, M.A.: 1989, Teaching Post-Secondary Mathematics at a Distance (A report to the Commonwealth Secretariat No. Deakin University).
Ernest, P.: 1991, The Philosophy of Mathematics Education: Studies in Mathematics Education, Falmer Press, London.
Ernest, P.: 1992, ‘Varieties of constructivism: Their metaphors, epistemologies and implications for mathematics education’, paper presented at, 7th International Congress for Mathematics Education,, Quebec, Canada.
Harris, P.: 1984, Teaching About Time in Tribal Aboriginal Communities, Dept. of Education, Darwin.
Kemmis, S.: 1992 (draft), Curriculum, Contestation and Ideology, Faculty of Education: Deakin University, Geelong, Geelong.
Kilpatrick, J.: 1987, ‘What constructivism might be in mathematics education’, in J.C. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, and C. Kieran (eds.), Psychology of Mathematics Education PME-XI, International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Montreal, Canada, pp. 4–25.
Leder, G.H. and Forgasz, H.J.: 1992, ‘Perspectives on learning, teaching and assessment’, in G.H. Leder (ed.), Assessment and Learning of Mathematics, Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, pp. 1–23.
Lerman, S.: in press, ‘Constructivism and intersubjectivity: Parallel of shared meanings in mathematics?’, in J. Mousley, and R. Zevenbergen (eds.), Constructivism: The Intersection of Disciplines, Deakin University Press, Geelong.
Mahar, C., Harker, R. and Wilkes, C.: 1990, ‘The basic theoretical position’, in R. Harker, C. Mahar, and C. Wilkes (eds.), An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory, Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, pp. 1–250.
Malin, M.: 1990, ‘The visibility and invisibility of Aboriginal students in an urban classroom’, Australian Journal of Education 34(3), 321–329.
Moi, T.: 1991, ‘Appropriating Bourdieu: Feminist theory and Pierre Bourdieu's sociology of culture’, New Literary History 22(4), 1017–1049.
Noddings, N.: 1992, ‘Constructivism in mathematics education’, in R.B. Davis, C.A. Maher, and N. Noddings (eds.), Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp. 7–180.
Pirie, S., and Kieren, T.: 1982, ‘Creating constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 23(5), 505–528.
Richards, J.: 1991, ‘Mathematical discussions’, in E. von Glasersfeld (eds.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 13–51.
van den, Brink, J.: 1991, ‘Didactic constructivism’, in E. von, Glasersfeld (eds.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
von, Glasersfeld, E.: 1991, ‘Introduction’, in E. von, Glaserfeld (eds.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education., Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp. xiii-xx.
von, Glasersfeld, E.: 1992, ‘An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical’, in R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings (eds.), Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, pp. 19–30.
Wacquant, L.: 1987, ‘Symbolic violence and the making of the French agriculturalist: An enquiry into Pierre Bourdieu's sociology’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 23 (1), 65–88.
Walkerdine, V.: 1984, ‘Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education’, in J. Henriques, W. Holloway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, and V. Walkerdine (eds.), Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity., Methuen, London, pp. 153–202.
Walkerdine, V.: 1988, The Mastery of Reason: Cognitive Development and the Production of Rationality., Routledge, London.
Walkerdine, V.: 1990, ‘Difference, cognition and mathematics education’, For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(3), 51–56.
Walkerdine, V. and Lucey, H.: 1989, Democracy in the Kitchen: Regulating Mothers and Socialising Daughters, Virago, London.
Zevenbergen, R.: 1994, ‘Mathematics as a Social Filter’, in P. O'Connor (eds.), Thinking Work: Theoretical, Perspectives on Workplace Literacies, Adult Literacy and Basic Skills Action Coalition, Sydney, pp. 138–199.
Zevenbergen, R.: (1994), ‘Psychologising educational difference’, in G. Bell, B. Wright, N. Leeson, and J. Geake (eds.), Challenges in Mathematics Education: Constraints on Construction, The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Lismore, pp. 717–724.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zevenbergen, R. Constructivism as a liberal bourgeois discourse. Educ Stud Math 31, 95–113 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143928
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143928