Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review of some unusual applications of signal detection theory

  • Note
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, D.K. and Ulehla, Z.J. (1969). “Signal detection analysis of aggression scale data” Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 4: 387–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D.K. and Ulehla, Z.J. (1971). “Detection theory and problems of psychosocial discrimination”, in H.L. Costner, ed., Sociological Methodology 1971. London: Josey-Bass (on behalf of the American Sociological Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G.W. and Kramer, B.M. (1946). “Some roots of prejudice”, Journal of Psychology 22: 9–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angus, R.C. and Daniel, T.C. (1974). “Applying theory of signal-detection in marketing—product development and evaluation”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56: 573–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avis, W.F. (1972). “An application of the theory of signal detectability to an after-effect and an illusion”, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto; abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International, Series B 34: 4012–4013 (1974).

  • Barnes, R.F. and Drury, C.G. (1976). “An application of signal detection theory to EMS decision making”, Ethics in Science and Medicine 3: 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B.R. (1971). “Detection performance in a simulated real-time reconnaissance mission”, Human Factors 13: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blignaut, C.J.H. (1979). “The perception of hazard II. The contribution of signal detection to hazard perception”, Ergonomics 22: 1177–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D.B. (1971) Decision and Stress. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, B.C. (1968). “The measures of information retrieval effectiveness proposed by Swets”, Journal of Documentation 24: 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I.D. (1972). “Research on road users' perception and decision-making: a critical review of methodological factors”, presented at a symposium organised by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, entitled “Road User Perception and Decision-Making”, Rome, 1972.

  • Chapman, C.R. and Feather, B.W. (1971). “Sensitivity to phobic imagery: a sensory decision theory analysis”, Behavior Research and Therapy 9: 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnis, J.C. (1972). “An application of the theory of signal detectability to drivers' passing decisions in a simulated task”, Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan; abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International, Series B 33: 4535–4536 (1973).

  • Clark, W.C. (1969). “Sensory decision-theory analysis of the placebo effect on the criterion for pain and thermal sensitivity (d')”, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 74: 363–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C., Kurlander, K., Bieber, R. and Glassman, A.H. (1977). “Signal detection theory treatment of response set in mood questionnaires”, in C.D. Spielberger and I.G. Sarason, eds., Stress and Anxiety: IV. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C. and Mehl, L. (1971). “Values of d' obtained by various SDT procedures are not equal when thermal stimuli are judged”, Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 6: 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleverdon, C.W. (1967). “The Cranfield tests on index language devices”, Aslib Proceedings 19: 173–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H.S. and Ferrell, W.R. (1969). “Human operator decision making in manual control”, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Transactions on Man—Machine Systems MMS-10: 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C.H., Dawes, R.M. and Tversky, A. (1970). Mathematical Psychology. An Elementary Introduction. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperbrand, A.S. and Alexander, L.T. (1965). “A method for applying statistical decision theory to system task analysis”, Human Factors 7: 507–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbit, T.E. and Engen, T. (1971). “Facilitation of olfactory detection”, Perception and Psychophysics 10: 433–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R.H. and Hawkins, H.L. (1976). “Application of the theory of signal detectability to kinesthetic discrimination tasks”, Journal of Motor Behavior 8: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, H.A., Boyer, W.N. and Guyot, G.W. (1970). “Determination of a DL using two-point tactual stimuli: a signal-detection approach”, Psychonomic Science 21: 198–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandeliker, J. and Dorfman, D.D. (1969). “Receiver-operating characteristic curves for taboo and neutral words”, Psychonomic Science 17: 201–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G.M. (1977). “Effects of phase-of-respiration on GSR detection”, British Journal of Psychology 68: 499–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, D.D., Keeve, S. and Saslow, C. (1971). “Ethnic identification—a signal detection analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18: 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, C.G. and Addison, J.L. (1973). “An industrial study of the effects of feedback and fault density on inspection performance”, Ergonomics 16: 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, C.G. and Fox, J.G. eds. (1975). Human Reliability in Quality Control. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J.P. (1975). Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J.P., Greenberg, G.Z. and Schulman, A.I. (1961). “Operating characteristics, signal detectability, and the method of free response”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33: 993–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfner, L.F. and Delaune, W.R. (1970). “Detection of shift in binaural images: a rating method approach”, Perception and Psychophysics 8: 158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidell, S., Pearsons, K.S. and Bennett, R. (1974). “Prediction of aural detectability of noise signals”, Human Factors 16: 373–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, D.C. and French, J. (1978). “Visual field differences in a facial recognition task using signal detection theory”, Neuropsychologia 16: 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, J.E.R. (1979). “Variations of the triangular method and the relationship of its unidimensional probabilistic models to three-alternative forced-choice signal detection theory models”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 32: 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gai, E.G. and Curry, R.E. (1978). “Perseveration effects in detection tasks with correlated decision intervals”, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-8: 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, L.H. (1949). “On scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures”, Radiology 52: 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.M. and Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley. The 1974 reprint (Huntingdon, New York: Krieger) contains a useful classified bibliography of work published in the period 1967–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, D.R. and Morgan, B.J.T. (1972). “Some aspects of ROC curve fitting: normal and logistic models”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 9: 128–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, J.B. (1971). “Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas”, Psychological Bulletin 75: 424–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, J.M. and Grant, B.F. (1978). “Clinical psychophysics: applications of ratio scaling and signal detection methods to research on pain, fear, drugs, and medical decision making”, Psychological Bulletin 85: 1154–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, M.L. (1970). “Recognition memory for hostile and friendly stimuli as a function of neuroticism, introversion-extraversion and arousal: a signal detection approach”, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin; abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International, Series B 31: 4338–4339 (1971).

  • Hutchinson, T.P. (1976). “The usefulness of signal detection theory in the analysis of ordinal data from diverse fields”, Report from the Traffic (now the Transport) Studies Group, University College London.

  • Hutchinson, T.P. (1977). “On the relevance of signal detection theory to the correction for guessing”, Contemporary Educational Psychology 2: 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T.P. (1978). “An extension of the signal detection model of information retrieval”, Journal of Documentation 34: 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T.P. (1979). “Signal probability and the slope of the ROC”, available from the author.

  • Hutchinson, T.P. (1980). “The definition of restraint effectiveness”, Accident Analysis and Prevention 12: 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagacinski, R.J., Isaac, P.D. and Burke, M.W. (1977). “Application of signal detection theory to perceptual-motor skills: decision processes in basketball shooting”, Journal of Motor Behavior 9: 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, W.H. (1972). “The detection of relative movement of a leading vehicle at night”, presented at a symposium organised by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, entitled “Road User Perception and Decision-Making”, Rome, 1972.

  • Jesteadt, W. and Bilger, R.C. (1974). “Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 55: 1266–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1968). “An experimental analysis of single stimulus tests and multiple choice tests of recognition memory”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 76: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D.H. (1969). “Threshold theories of signal detection”, Psychological Review 76: 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushnir, T. and Duncan, K.D. (1978). “An analysis of social facilitation effects in terms of signal detection theory”, Psychological Record 28: 535–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laming, D. (1973). Mathematical Psychology. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. (1963). “Choosing among confusably distributed stimuli with specified likelihood ratios”, Perceptual and Motor Skills 16: 445–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. (1969). “Relationships between Thurstone category scaling and signal detection theory”, Psychological Bulletin 71: 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, P.H. and Norman, D.A. (1972). Human Information Processing. An Introduction to Psychology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry, C.G. and Kulics, A.T. (1978). “The effects of diazepam, morphine and lidocaine on nocioception in rhesus monkeys: a signal detection analysis”, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 205: 302–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linker, E., Moore, M.E. and Galanter, E. (1964). “Taste thresholds, detection models, and disparate results”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 67: 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusted, L.B. (1971a). “Decision-making studies in patient management”, New England Journal of Medicine 284: 416–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusted, L.B. (1971b). “Signal detectability and medical decision-making”, Science 171: 1217–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, N.A., Kaplan, H.L. and Creelman, C.D. (1977). “The psychophysics of categorical perception”, Psychological Review 84: 452–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichol, D. (1972). A Primer of Signal Detection Theory. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miehle, W. and Siegel, A.I. (1970). “Defect signal detection model based on variable confidence”, Human Factors 12: 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, J. (1973). “Eliminating the guessing factor in the multiple choice test”, Educational and Psychological Measurement 33: 637–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.J. and Leibowitz, H.W. (1976). “A signal detection analysis of hypnotically induced narrowing of the peripheral visual field”, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 85: 446–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B.J.T. (1976). “The uniform distribution in signal detection theory”, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 29: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, R.W.J. (1975). “Effect of cognitive appraisal on d' and response bias to experimental stress”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 735–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, K.M. (1974) “Decision processes of baseball batters”, Human Factors 16: 520–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome, L.R. (1974). “Risk taking as a decision process in driving”, Supplementary Report 81 UC, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogasawara, I. (1967). “The analysis of English hearing ability in terms of signal detection model”, Japanese Psychological Research 9: 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Mahony, M. (1972). “Salt taste senstivity: a signal detection approach”, Perception 1: 459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastore, R.E. and Scheirer, C.J. (1974). “Signal detection theory: considerations for general applications”, Psychological Bulletin 81: 945–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, K., Tarling, R. and Meudell, P. (1977). “Decisions in the criminal justice process and signal detection theory: a note”, Quality and Quantity 11: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, I. and Norman, D.A. (1964). “A nonparametric analysis of recognition experiments”, Psychonomic Science 1: 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polzella, D.J. and Gouse, A.S. (1978). “PSYCHIC: a BASIC game to test ESP as d'”, Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 10: 426–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R.H. (1966). “Signal detection methods in personality and perception”, Psychological Bulletin 66: 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quanty, M.B., Keats, J.A. and Harkins, S.G. (1975). “Prejudice and criteria for identification of ethnic photographs”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 449–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, T., James, J.W. and Morris, C.A. (1972). “The use of multiple thresholds in determining the mode of transmission of semi-continuous traits”, Annals of Human Genetics 36: 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.T. (1972). “Nonparametric indexes of sensitivity and response bias”, Psychological Bulletin 78: 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S.E. (1969a). “The parametric description of retrieval tests. Part 1; the basic parameters”, Journal of Documentation 25: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S.E. (1969b). “The parametric description of retrieval tests. Part 2; overall measures”, Journal of Documentation 25: 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollman, G.B. (1977). “Signal detection theory measurement of pain: a review and critique”, Pain 3: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L.G., Hoffman, P.J., LaForge, G.E. and Hsieh, K.-C. (1966a). “Optimum cutting scores to discriminate groups of unequal size and variance”, Journal of Applied Psychology 50: 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L.G., Hoffman, P.J. and Hsieh, K.-C. (1966b). “Utilities as base-rate multipliers in the determination of optimum cutting scores for the discrimination of groups of unequal size and variance”, Journal of Applied Psychology 50: 364–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, J.R., Cross, H.A. and Mills, D.E. (1970). “A signal detection analysis of the Rod and Frame Test”, Perception and Psychophysics 7: 276–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, A.I. and Greenberg, G.Z. (1970). “Operating characteristics and a priori probability of the signal”, Perception and Psychophysics 8: 317–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, H.C. and Bate, A.J. (1969) “The effect of number of allowed target choices upon the target-reporting behavior of radar observers”, Report No. AMRLTR-69–96, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skakhar, G.B., Leiblich, I. and Kugelmass, S. (1970). “Guilty knowledge technique: application of signal detection measures”, Journal of Applied Psychology 54: 409–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, A.I. and Pfeiffer, M.G. (1969). “Predicting academic success through applications of theory of signal detectability variables”, Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 4: 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenson, H., Kleinmuntz, B. and Scott, B. (1975). “Personality assessment as a signal detection task”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43: 794–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, J.J., Banks, J.H., Widener, T.A. and Jennings, J.W. (1974). “Selected elements of a battalion integrated sensor system: device and mix effectiveness”, Research Report 1183 U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S. (1972). “Fact and artifact in the psychology of schizophrenia”, in M. Hammer, K. Salzinger and S. Sutton, eds., Psychopathology, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swensson, R.G. (1980). “A two-stage detection model applied to skilled visual search by radiologists”, Perception and Psychophysics 27: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J.A. (1959). “Indices of signal discriminability obtained with various psychophysical procedures”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31: 511–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J.A. (1963) “Information retrieval systems”, Science 141: 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J.A., ed. (1964). Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J.A. (1973). “The Relative Operating Characteristic in psychology”, Science 182: 990–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J.A. (1976a). “Signal detection theory applied to the evaluation of imaging techniques in clinical medicine”, presented at the 21st International Congress of Psychology, Paris, 1976.

  • Swets, J.A. (1976b). “Signal detection theory applied to vigilance”, presented at a symposium sponsored by the Scientific Affairs Division of NATO, entitled “Vigilance II: Relationships among Theory, Physiological Correlates and Operational Performance”, St. Vincent, Italy, 1976.

  • Swets, J.A., Tanner, W.P. and Birdsall, T.G. (1961). “Decision processes in perception”, Psychological Review 68: 301–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodore, L.H. and Mandelcorn, M.S. (1973). “Hysterical blindness: a case report and study using a modern psychophysical technique”, Journal of Abnormal Psychology 82: 552–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, C.L. (1968). “Use of signal detection theory in depth perception research: an example”, Perceptual and Motor Skills 26: 705–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, A.H. and Poulton, E.C. (1973). “Monitoring up to 16 synthetic television pictures showing a great deal of movement”, Ergonomics 16: 381–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, M. (1977). “On the stability of d'”, Psychological Bulletin 84: 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulehla, Z.J. (1966). “Optimality of perceptual decision criteria”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 71: 564–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulehla, Z.J. (1966). “Optimality of perceptual decision criteria applied to conceptual discrimination”, Psychonomic Science 8: 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulehla, Z.J., Canges, L. and Wackwitz, F. (1967b). “Integration of conceptual information”, Psychonomic Science 8: 223–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, S.M. (1974). “Binary responses to numerical stimuli: tests of signal detection theory and related models of psychophysical judgement” Ph.D. thesis, Dartmouth College; abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International, Series B 35: 1956 (1974).

  • Williams, K.H., Williams, J.E. and Beck, R.C. (1973). “Assessing children's racial attitudes via a signal detection model”, Perceptual and Motor Skills 36: 587–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.J. and Hoffmann E.R. (1977). “The influence of motorcycle visibility on traffic accidents”, Report from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne.

  • Yerushalmy, J. (1969). “The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows”, Radiologic Clinics of North America 7: 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. T. P. Hutchinson

    Present address: Coventry (Lanchester) Polytechnic, CV1 5FB, Coventry, U.K.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Transport Studies Group, University College London, Gower Street, WC1, London, Gt. Britain

    T. P. Hutchinson

Authors
  1. T. P. Hutchinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hutchinson, T.P. A review of some unusual applications of signal detection theory. Qual Quant 15, 71–98 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144302

Keywords

Search

Navigation