Skip to main content
Log in

Technical efficiency measures for dairy farms using panel data: A comparison of alternative model specifications

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the impact of fixed effects production functions vis-à-vis stochastic production frontiers on technical efficiency measures. An unbalanced panel consisting of 96 Vermont dairy farmers for the 1971–1984 period was used in the analysis. The models examined incorporated both time-variant and time-invariant technical efficiency. The major source of variation in efficiency levels across models stemmed from the assumption made concerning the distribution of the one-sided term in the stochastic frontiers. In general, the fixed effects technique was found superior to the stochastic production frontier methodology. Despite the fact that the results of various statistical tests revealed the superiority of some specifications over others, the overall conclusion of the study is that the efficiency analysis was fairly consistent throughout all the models considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, Munir. (1993). “Econometric Analysis of Output Growth Using Panel Data: The Case of Vermont Dairy Farms.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Aigner, D. J., and S. F. Chu. (1968). “On Estimating the Industry Production Function.” American Economic Review 58, 826–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D. J., C. A. K. Lovell, and R. J. Schmidt. (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E. (1992). “Frontier Production Functions and Technical Efficiency: A Survey of Empirical Applications in Agricultural Economics.” Agricultural Economics 7, 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1993). “A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Incorporating a Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects.” Working paper, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1992). “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1988). “Prediction of Firm-Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 38, 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., T. J. Coelli, and T. C. Colby. (1989). “Estimation of Frontier Production Functions and the Efficiencies of Indian Farms Using Panel Data From ICRISAT'S Village Level Studies.” Journal of Quantitative Economics 5, 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. W. (1990). “Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers.” Journal of Econometrics 46: 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Ureta, B. E., and A. E. Pinheiro. (1993). “Efficiency Analysis of Developing Country Agriculture: A Review of the Frontier Function Literature.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 22: 88–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Ureta, B. E., and L. Rieger. (1991). “Dairy Farm Efficiency Measurement Using Stochastic Frontiers and Neoclassical Duality.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Ureta, B. E. (1986). “Technical Efficiency Measures for Dairy Farms Based on a Probabilistic Frontier Function Model.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 34, 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, P., R. Fair, S. Grosskopf, and S. Kraft. (1987). “Technical Efficiency and Size: The Case of Illinois Grain Farms.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 14, 367–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J. (1992). “A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation Frontier Version 2.0.” Economics Letters 39, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C., P. Schmidt, and R. C. Sickles. (1990). “Production Frontiers with Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Variation in Efficiency Levels.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. J. (1987). “Farm Specific Technical Efficiency in the England and Wales Dairy Sector.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 14, 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. J., and J. Lingard. (1982). “Management Bias and Returns to Scale in a Cobb-Douglas Production Function for Agriculture.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 19, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, S. (1991). “Effects of Technological Change and Institutional Reform on Production Growth in Chinese Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 216–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (120), 253–281.

  • Fecher, F., and P. Pestieau. (1993). “Efficiency and Competition in O.E.C.D. Financial Services.” In H. O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, and P. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency Techniques and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, chapter 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, B.-H., and R. C. Sickles. (1989). “Finite Sample Evidence on the Performance of Stochastic Frontier Models Using Panel Data.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 229–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, D. H., M. I. Nadiri, Lars-Hendrik Roller, and R. C. Sickles. (1993). “Efficiency and Productivity Growth Comparisons of European and U.S. Air Carriers: A First Look at the Data.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1957). “Specification Bias in Estimation of Production Functions.” Journal of Farm Economics 39, 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica 46, 1251–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, Earl. O. (1946). “Production Functions from a Random Sample of Farms.” Journal of Farm Economics 28, 989–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, I. (1976). “Returns to Scale in Farming: Further Evidence.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58, 745–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, I. (1962). “Estimation of Production Function Parameters Combining Time-Series and Cross-Section Data.” Econometrica 30, 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, I. (1958). “Simultaneous Equation Bias in the Context of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function.” Econometrica 26, 566–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, I. (1955). “Estimation of Production Function Parameters and Testing for Efficiency.” Econometrica 23, 325–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. D. (1988). “Stochastic Frontier Cost Function for Residential Child Care Provision.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 3, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan, K. P. (1991). “The Importance of Efficient Use in the Adoption of Technology: A Micro Panel Data Analysis.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 2, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. (1990). “Production Frontiers, Panel Data, and Time Varying Technical Inefficiency.” Journal of Econometrics 27, 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., and A. Heshmati. (1995). “Efficiency Measurement in Swedish Dairy Farms: An Application of Rotating Panel Data, 1976–88.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 3, 660–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., and L. Hjalmarsson. (1993). “Technical Efficiency and Technological Progress in Swedish Dairy Farms.” In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency Techniques and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., S. Ghosh, and J. T. McGuckin. (1991). “A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 9, 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., B. Biswas, and D. V. Bailey. (1989). “A Study of Economic Efficiency of Utah Dairy Farmers: A System Approach.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 71, 595–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K. (1993). “Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency.” In H. O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, and P. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1979). “A Note on the Form of Production Function and Productivity.” In Measurement and Interpretation of Productivity. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, pp. 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W., and J. van den Broeck. (1977). “Efficiency Estimation From Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.” International Economics Review 18, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1961). “Empirical Production Function Free of Management Bias.” Journal of Farm Economics 43, 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1978). “On the Pooling of Time-Series and Cross-Section Data.” Econometrica 46, 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M., and L. F. Lee. (1981). “The Measurements and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry.” The Journal of Development Economics 9, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, N. P., and T. Young. (1983). “Frontier Production Functions and the Measurement of Technical Efficiency.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 34, 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilder, E., and B. E. Bravo-Ureta. (1994). “Análisis de Costo en Explotaciones Lecheras de la Región Central Argentina con Algunas Comparaciones Internacionales.” Selected paper presented at the XXV Annual Meetings of the Argentinean Agricultural Economics Association, Mendoza, Argentina.

  • Schmidt, P., and R. C. Sickles. (1984). “Production Frontiers and Panel Data.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, J. L., Jr. (1990). “Estimated Stochastic Frontier Systems with Unbalanced Panel Data: The Case of Floor Tile Manufacturers in Egypt.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 5, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., and R. M. Thrall. (1990). “Recent Developments in DEA: The Mathematical Programming Approach to Frontier Analysis.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauer, L. W., and K. P. Belbase. (1987); “Technical Efficiency of New York Dairy Farms.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 16, 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, C. G., and J. Lowenberg-DeBoer. (1988). “Farm-to-Farm Productivity Differences and Whole-Farm Production Functions.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 36, 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T., and N. P. Russell. (1983). “Frontier Production Functions and the Measurement of Technical Efficiency.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 34, 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A., J. Kmenta, and J. Drèze. (1966). “Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models.” Econometrica 34, 784–795.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, M., Bravo-Ureta, B.E. Technical efficiency measures for dairy farms using panel data: A comparison of alternative model specifications. J Prod Anal 7, 399–415 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162049

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162049

Keywords

Navigation