Skip to main content
Log in

Research and development in the growth process

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces into Schumpeterian growth theory an important element of heterogeneity in the structure of innovative activity—namely, the distinction between research and development. We construct a simple model of growth to investigate how the (steady-state) rate of growth affects and is affected by the relative mix between research and development. Although we assume for simplicity that the total supply of innovative activity is given it turns out that, with one important exception, the growth rate responds to most parameter changes in the same way as in previous models where growth was determined by the total amount of innovative activity. In particular, the level of research tends to covary positively with the rate of growth, even in the extreme case where the general knowledge that underlies long-run growth is created only by secondary innovations arising from the development process. The exception concerns the effects of competition on growth. Although simpler Schumpeterian growth models implied that increased competition would reduce growth by reducing the incentive to innovate, introducing the distinction between research and development implies that this effect is likely to be reversed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, Philippe, Mathias Dewatripont, and Patrick Rey. (1995). “Competition, Financial Discipline and Growth.” Unpublished paper.

  • Aghion, Philippe, Christopher Harris, and John Vickers. (1995). “Competition and Growth with Step-by-Step Technological Progress.” Unpublished paper.

  • Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. (1992). “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica 60, 323–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, Philippe, and Jean Tirole. (1994). “On the Management of Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 1185–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amable, Bruno. (1993). “Radical and Incremental Innovation: A Model of Endogenous and Unsteady Growth.” Unpublished paper, CEPREMAP.

  • Andolfatto, David, and Glenn M. MacDonald. (1993). “Endogenous Technological Change, Growth, and Aggregate Fluctuations.” Unpublished paper, University of Waterloo.

  • Barro, Robert J., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. (1994). “Quality Improvements in Models of Growth.” Working paper 4610, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Manuel Trajtenberg. (1992). “General Purpose Technologies: ‘Engines of Growth?’ ” Working paper 4148, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Caballero, Ricardo J., and Adam B. Jaffé. (1993). “How High Are the Giants' Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Leonard K., and Elias Dinopoulos. (1993). “Schumpeterian Growth and Stochastic Economic Fluctuations.” Unpublished paper, University of Florida.

  • Cohen, Daniel, and Gilles St.-Paul. (1994). “Uneven Technical Process and Job Destructions.” Working paper 9412, CEPREMAP.

  • Green, Jerry, and Suzanne Scotchmer. (1995). “On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation.” Rand Journal of Economics 26, 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., and M. Trajtenberg. (1994). “A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies.” Working paper 32, CIAR.

  • Jovanovic, Boyan, and Glenn M. MacDonald. (1994). “Competitive Diffusion.” Journal of Political Economy 102, 24–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, Boyan, and Yaw Nyarko. (1994). “The Bayesian Foundations of Learning by Doing.” Working paper, New York University.

  • Jovanovic, Boyan, and Rafael Rob. (1990). “Long Waves and Short Waves: Growth Through Intensive and Extensive Search.” Econometrica 58, 1391–1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon. (1940). “Schumpeter's Business Cycles.” American Economic Review 30, 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Robert E.Jr. (1993). “Making a Miracle.” Econometrica 60, 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N., and L. E. BirdzellJr. (1986). How the West Crew Rich. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, P. S. (1991). “Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 99, 807–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokey, N. L. (1988). “Learning by Doing and the Introduction of New Goods.” Journal of Political Economy 96, 701–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Alwyn. (1993a). “Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing.” Journal of Political Economy 101, 443–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Alwyn. (1993b). “Substitution and Complementarity in Endogenous Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 775–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Jinli. (1993). “Innovative Vs. Imitative R&D and Economic Growth.” Unpublished paper, University of Western Ontario.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aghion, P., Howitt, P. Research and development in the growth process. J Econ Growth 1, 49–73 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163342

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation