Abstract
It has been argued that fundamentally different methodological approaches have made for ‘two sociologies’. This view has obscured the fact that the problem of validity has to be tackled independently of any specific methodological premises because of the textuality of sociological data. This does not necessarily imply, however, a single, unified strategy for validity testing.
In this paper, some basic theoretical presuppositions underlying the approach to validity testing in quantitative research will be contrasted with the strategies offered by Max Weber's methodological writings on the ideal type. It is argued that the use of ideal typical constructs in qualitative research (exemplified by patient's illness careers) allows systematic validity testing despite the important differences in the conceptualization of social reality which is used in quantitative research, thus serving the purpose of any empirical sociological research, that is, to gain valid insight into societies' concrete reality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association (1954). “Validity. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques”, Psychological Bulletin 51 (suppl.): 13–28.
AtteslanderP. KneübuhlerH.-U. (1975). Verzerrungen im Interview. Zu einer Fehlertheorie der Befragung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
BartonA.H. & LazarsfeldP. (1955). “Some functions of qualitative analysis in social research”, Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie 1: 321–361.
BlalockH. (1960). Social Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill.
BlalockH. (1982). Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
CamilleriS.F. (1962). “Theory, probability, and induction in social research”, American Sociological Review 27: 170–178.
CampbellD. (1957). “Factors Relevant to the Validity of Experiments in Social Settings”, Psychological Bulletin 54: 297–312.
CicourelA.V. (1964). Method and Measurement in Sociology. Glencoe: Free Press.
CicourelA.V. (1982). “Interviews, surveys, and ecological validity”, American Sociologist 17: 11–20.
CollinsR. (1984). “Statistics versus words”, pp. 329–362 in Sociological Theory, ed. by R.Collins. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.
CronbachL.J. (1961). Essentials of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.
CronbachL.J. & MeehlP. (1955). “Construct validity of psychological tests”, Psychological Bulletin 52: 281–302.
D'AndradeR. (1986). Three scientific world views and the covering law model, pp. 19–41 in Metatheory in Social Science. Pluralisms and Subjectivities, ed. by FiskeD.W. and ShwederR.A. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
DaweA. (1970). “The two sociologies”, British Journal of Sociology 21: 207–218.
GerhardtU. (1985). “Erzähldaten und Hypothesenkonstruktion. Überlegungen zum Gültigkeitsproblem in der biographischen Sozialforschung”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 37: 230–256.
GerhardtU. (1986a). “Verstehende Strukturanalyse: Die Konstruktion von Idealtypen als Analyseschritt bei der Auswertung qualitativer Forschungsmaterialien”, pp. 31–83 in Sozialstruktur und soziale Typik, ed. by H.-G.Soeffner. Frankfurt: Campus.
GerhardtU. (1986b). Patientenkarrieren. Eine medizinsoziologische Studie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
GerhardtU. (1990). “Patient careers in end-stage renal failure”, Social Science & Medicine 30: 1211–1224.
GerhardtU. & KirchgässlerK.U. (1986). CABS und Rückkehr zur Arbeit. Giessen: Projektantrag DFG.
HenrichD. (1952). Die Einheit der Wissenschaftslehre Max Webers. Tübingen: Mohr.
HirschE.D. (1967). Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
HuffT. (1981). On the methodology of the social sciences: a review essay (3 parts), Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 461–475, 12: 81–94, 205–219.
JeffreyR.C. (1971). “Probability measures and integrals”, pp. 167–221 in Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, ed. by R.Carnap and R.C.Jeffrey. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
KerlingerF.N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
KirchgässlerK.U. (1986). Diagnose und Deutung. Giessen: Ferber.
KirchgässlerK.U. (1990). “Change and continuity in patients' theories of epilepsy”, Social Science & Medicine 30: 1313–1318.
KörnerS. (1960). The Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Hutchinson.
SchützA. (1962). Collected Papers, Vol. I. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
SuppesP. (1984). Probabilistic Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell.
WeberM. (1904/1949). “Objectivity” in the social sciences and social policy, pp. 50–112 in The Methodology of the Social Sciences, transl. and ed. by E.A.Shils and H.A.Finch. New York: Free Press.
WeberM. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, ed. and with an introduction by T.Parsons. New York: Free Press.
ZellerR.A. and CarminesE.G. (1980). Measurement in the Social Sciences: The Link Between Theory and Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirchgässler, K.U. Validity — the quest for reality in quantitative and qualitative research. Qual Quant 25, 285–295 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167533
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167533