Abstract
This paper compares the steady-state welfare implications of opening a two-country overlapping-generations world to international labor or capital mobility. By capturing the dual nature of labor mobility through the effect of migrants' savings on capital formation, this dynamic setting recovers the asymmetry between capital and labor denied to them in the existing static literature. It is shown that the optimal choice of factor mobility from a national viewpoint depends on the state of the economy with respect to the Golden Rule and on migrants' average savings ratio with respect to that of non-migrants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bhagwati JN (1979) International factor movements and the national advantage. Ind Econ Rev 14:73–100
Bhagwati JN, Srinivasan TN (1983) On the choice between capital and labor mobility. J Int Econ 14:209–221
Buiter WH (1981) Time preference and international lending and borrowing in an overlapping-generations model. J Polit Econ 89:769–797
Diamond PA (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am Econ Rev 55:1126–1150
Galor O (1986) Time preference and international labor migration. J Econ Theory 38:1–20
Galor O, Ryder HE (1989) Existence, uniqueness and stability of equilibrium in an overlapping-generations model with productive capital. J Econ Theory 49:360–375
Galor O, Stark O (1991) The impact of differences in the levels of technology on international labor migration. J Population Econ 4:1–12
Kochhar R (1991) International labor migration and domestic labor supply. Mimeo
Ramaswami VK (1968) International factor movement and the national advantage. Economica 35:309–310
Wong K (1983) On choosing among trade in goods and international capital and labor mobility: a theoretical analysis. J Int Econ 14:223–250
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank anonymous referees for useful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galor, O. The choice of factor mobility in a dynamic world. J Popul Econ 5, 135–144 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168272
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00168272