Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Species-specific antipredatory behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Prey species may use many different behaviours to avoid predation. In this study, the antipredator behaviours of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) and juvenile perch (Perca fluviatilis) were studied in wading pools with three kinds of structural complexity: no structure, structure simulating vegetation and structure simulating bottom crevices. Predation experiments with piscivorous perch and habitat choice experiments with the prey were performed, and the foraging success and prey choice of the predators were related to the type of structure. Predator foraging success was lower in the vegetation than in the other treatments. In the absence of structure and with vegetation structure, predators preferred perch over roach, while the preference was reversed in the crevice treatment. Roach and perch differed in their antipredatory behaviours. Roach responded to the presence of predators by schooling, moving fast and remaining at the surface, and escaped from attacks by jumping out of the water. In contrast, perch moved more slowly, dispersed after attacks and tried to hide at the bottom. Perch always preferred the vegetation structure to the non-structured part of the pool, while roach showed preference for the vegetation structure only when predators were present. Roach never occurred in crevices, whereas perch used crevices when predators where present. Predator pursuit speed was lower in the vegetation structure than in the non-structured treatment, but prey escape speed was unaffected. The results suggest that both the quantity and quality of structural complexity interacting with species-specific antipredator behaviours are important for predator-prey dynamics. It is also suggested that the presence of structure can have substantial effects on the structure of North Eurasian fish communities, by affecting relative and absolute predation pressures from piscivorous perch on prey species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson O (1984) Optimal foraging by largemouth bass in structured environments. Ecology 65:851–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger J (1978) Group size, foraging, and antipredator ploys: an analysis of bighorn sheep decisions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram BCR (1980) Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Anim Behav 28:278–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyerle GB, Williams JE (1968) Some observations on food selectivity by northern pike in aquaria. Trans Am Fish Soc 97:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell GS (1986) Predation as a selective force on foraging herons: effects of plumage color and flocking. Auk 103:494–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert WH, Hedrick LE, Brower LP (1979) Mortality of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexxippus: avian predation at five overwintering sites in Mexico. Science 204:847–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1979a) Time budgeting and group size: a theory. Ecology 60:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T (1979b) Time budgeting and group size: a test of a theory. Ecology 60:618–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Martindale S, Pulliam HR (1980) Flocking: advantages and disadvantages. Nature 285:400–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Coull BC, Wells JBJ (1983) Refuges from fish predation: experiments with phytal meiofauna from the New Zealand rocky intertidal. Ecology 64:1599–1609

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook JH (1965) The adaptive significance of avian social organizations. Symp Zool Soc London 14:181–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder LB, Cooper WE (1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63:1802–1813

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl S (1988) Foraging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and light. Oikos 53:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P, Vigne N (1979) The effect of group size in horses on the rate of attacks by blood-sucking flies. Anim Behav 27:623–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklöv P, Hamrin SF (1989) Predatory efficiency and prey selection: interactions between pike Esox lucius, perch Perca fluviatilis and rudd Scardinus erythrophthalmus. Oikos 56:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster WA, Treherne JE (1981) Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 295:466–467

    Google Scholar 

  • George CJW (1960) Behavioral interactions of the pickerel (Esox niger and Esox americanus) and the mosquitofish (Gambusia patruelis). PhD thesis, Harvard University

  • Gillen AL, Stein RA, Carline RF (1981) Predation by pellet-reared tiger muskellunge on minnows and bluegills in experimental systems. Trans Am Fish Soc 110:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilinsky E (1984) The role of fish predation and spatial heterogeneity in determining benthic community structure. Ecology 65:455–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF (1987) Habitat selection under predation hazard: a test of a model with foraging minnows. Ecology 68:1856–1862

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass NR (1971) Computer analysis of predation energetics in the largemouth bass. In: Patten BC (ed) Systems analyses and simulation ecology, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 325–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfman GS (1986) Behavioural responses of prey fishes during predator-prey interactions. In: Fender ME, Lauder GV (eds) Predator-prey relationships: perspectives and approaches from the study of the lower vertebrates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 135–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG (1984) Predation risk and the feeding of the hoary marmot in Alaska. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Holomuzki JR (1986) Habitat use and fish avoidance behaviors by the stream-dwelling isopod Lirceus fontinalis. Oikos 52:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR, Dobson AP (1987) Antipredator behaviour and the population dynamics of simple predator-prey systems. Am Nat 130:431–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries MJ, Lawton JH (1984) Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol J Linn Soc 23:269–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson L (1987) Experimental evidence for interactive habitat segregation between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and rudd (Scardinus erythrophthalmus). Oecologia 73:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson L, Persson L (1986) The fish community of temperate eutrophic lakes. In: Riemann B, Söndergaard M (eds) Carbon dynamics of eutrophic temperate lakes: the structure and functions of the pelagic environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 237–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward RE (1978) Hawks and doves: factors affecting success and selection in goshawk attacks on wood-pigeons. J Anim Ecol 47:449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus J (1979) The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive Quela. Anim Behav 27: 855–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1990) The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defence in fish. Ann Zool Fenn 27:51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1987) Provenance, shoal size and the sociobiology of predator evasion behaviour in minnow schools. Proc Roy Soc London 229:439–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauck WL, Coble DW (1971) Vulnerability of some fishes to northern pike (Esox lucius) predation. J Fish Res Bd Can 28:957–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M (1979) Can an experienced predator overcome the confusion of swarming prey more easily? Anim Behav 27:1122–1126

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Heller R (1978) Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) Nature 27:642–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill Sr StJ, Cullen JM (1974) Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators. J Zool London 172: 549–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P, Dill LM (1990) Mortality risks versus food quality tradeoffs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. Ecology 71:1886–1892

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1974) Intertidal community structure: Experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15:93–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish J (1989) Re-examining the selfish herd: are central fish safer? Anim Behav 38:1048–1053

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1987) Effects of habitat and season on competitive interactions between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis). Oecologia 73:170–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1988) Asymmetries in competitive and predatory interactions in fish populations. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured populations — ecology and evolution. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1991a) Behavioral response to predators reverses the outcome of competition between prey species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1991b) Interspecific interactions. In: Winfield IJ, Nelson JS (eds) The biology of cyprinid fishes. Chapman and Hall, London New York, pp 530–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L, Greenberg LA (1990) Juvenile competitive bottlenecks: The perch (Perca fluviatilis)-roach (Rutilus rutilus) interaction. Ecology 71(1):44–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce CL (1988) Predator avoidance, microhabitat shift, and risk-sensitive foraging in larval dragonflies. Oecologia 77:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ (1986) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, London, pp 294–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME (1987) Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: Importance of stream depth and prey size. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation. Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, London, pp 333–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 122–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ, Stein RA (1988) Complex predator-prey interactions and predator intimidation among crayfish, piscivorous fish, and small benthic fish. Oecologia 75:94–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Reist JD (1980) Selective predation upon pelvic phenotypes of brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans, by northern pike, Esox lucius. Can J Zool 58:1245–1252

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino JF, Stein RA (1982) Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Trans Am Fish Soc 111:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savino JF, Stein RA (1989a) Behavioural interactions between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant density. Anim Behav 37:311–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino JR, Stein RA (1989b) Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation. Environ Biol Fish 24:287–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm HL, Zale AV (1985) Effects of cover and prey size on preferences of juvenile largemouth bass for blue tilapias and bluegills in tanks. Trans Am Fish Soc 114:725–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Prey refuges and predator-prey stability. Theor Popul Biol 31:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Moore RD (1990) Interacting effects of predator and prey behaviour in determining diets. In: Hughes RN (ed) Behavioural mechanisms of food selection. (Nato ASI Series, Vol. G 20) Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RA (1977) Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology 58:1237–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle CS (1986) Fish behaviour and fishing gear. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, London, pp 463–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1991) Nonlethal effects of a predator on competitive interactions between two anuran larvae. Ecology 72:1709–1720

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittelbach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1988) Interactions between growing predators and growing prey. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured populations — ecology and evolution. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield IJ (1986) The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinus erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis. J Fish Biol 29 (Suppl A):37–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Ecology, University of Umeå, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden

    B. Christensen & L. Persson

Authors
  1. B. Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Persson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Correspondence to: B. Christensen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, B., Persson, L. Species-specific antipredatory behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32, 1–9 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172217

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172217

Keywords

Search

Navigation