Skip to main content
Log in

Male preference for large females and assortative mating for body size in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis)

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Male sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) are polygynous and guard individual females for several hours to days after copulation. Even though the copulation itself only lasts 2–4 min, the total time that a male invests per female is considerably more and may constitute a substantial investment during a mating season. In such situations, when male copulation frequency is constrained, or when variation in female fecundity is high, mate choice by males may be adaptive. Large body size in female sand lizards is correlated with higher fecundity. In choice experiments performed in the laboratory, male sand lizards preferred to court large females rather than small females. In addition, when there was little difference in size between the females in the experiment, the males visited the two females more often before they started to court the preferred female. The results from a field study during 1984 and 1987–1990 showed that females are non-aggressive, have small neighboring home ranges (c. 100 m2) and may share burrows and sites for thermoregulation. This means that females can be found close together and thus gives males the opportunity to choose a mate. Assortative mating with respect to size was observed in a natural population, as well as a limited number of direct choices of females by males. These results support the results of the choice experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleksiuk M, Gregory P (1974) Regulation of seasonal mating behavior in Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Copeia 1974:681–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff W (1984) Lacerta agilis Linnaeus 1758 — Zauneidechse. In: Handbuch der Reptilien and Amphibien Europas 23–68

  • Bradbury J, Andersson M (eds) (1987) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. (Dahlem Workshop report). Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Appleton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Halliday TR (1977) Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo. Nature 269:56–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119:601–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartska W, Camazine B, Crews D (1982) Interactions of behavior and physiology during the annual reproductive cycle of the red-sided garter snake Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis. Herpetologica 38:104–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1982) Mate selection by female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettagoniidae, Conocephalus nigropleurum). Anim Behav 30:734–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde A, Endler J (1990) Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248:1405–1508

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L, Hubbell S (1984) Male choice — experimental demonstration in a brentid weevil. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzler G (1941) Die Paarungsbiologie einiger Eidechsen. Z Tierpsychol 4:335–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatsuru K, Kramer D (1982) Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (Pisces, Characidae). Science 216:753–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1984) Spacing patterns and social systems in the sand lizard Lacerta agilis. Honors thesis, University of Göteborg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1986) Ecology of a Swedish population of the sand lizard Lacerta agilis — a preliminary report. Mertensiella 1: 86–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1992 a) Contest success in relation to size and residency in the sand lizard. Anim Behav 44:386–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1992 b) Sexual selection and reproductive strategies in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis. Dissertation, University of Göteborg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent RC, Gross MR, Van den Berghe EP (1986) Male mate choice in fishes. Anim Behav 34:545–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmweyer LP, Parker GA (1990) Male mate choice as predicted by sperm competition in thirteen-lined ground squirrels. Nature 348:62–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon C (1983) A review of lizard chemoreception. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (eds) Lizard ecology — studies of a model organism. Harvard University Press

  • Stamps J (1983) Sexual selection dimorphism and territoriality. In: Huey RB, Pianka ER, Schoener TW (eds) Lizard Ecology — studies of a model organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrell P (1985) Male mate choice for larger, more fecund females in the red-spotted newt Notophthalmus viridescens: how is size assessed? Herpetologica 41:382–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt WB, Carter PA, Donohue K (1986) Females' choice of ‘good genotypes’ as mates is promoted by an insect mating system. Science 233:1187–1190

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsson, M. Male preference for large females and assortative mating for body size in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32, 337–341 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183789

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183789

Keywords

Navigation