Skip to main content
Log in

Time-dependent fracture criteria for 6061-T6 aluminum under stress-wave loading in uniaxial strain

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New spallation threshold data for 6061-T6 aluminum were obtained under stress-wave loading conditions in uniaxial strain, covering the range of tensile pulse durations of 60 to 200 nsec. This range of pulse duration was achieved by using exploding-foil techniques to accelerate thin Mylar plates against thin aluninum specimens. A comparison was made between exploding-foil spallation tests on 6061-T6 aluminum in air and vacuum. The data indicate that the spallation threshold of 6061-T6 aluminum is sensitive to the tensile pulse duration, amplitude, and impulse at the spall location. The exploding-foil impact conditions were reduced to stress-pulse loading parameters by using a one-dimensional elastic-plastic hydrodynamic computer code. The time-dependent aspects of the spallation threshold of 6061-T6 aluminum were found to obey failure theories which were rate process oriented, and which combine the effects of tensile-pulse duration, peak tensile stress, tensile impulse, and tensile-pulse shape. The present data have been used to quantitatively establish failure relationships for 6061:T6 aluminum. Where applicable, supplemental information in the literature concerning dynamic fracture of 6061-T6 aluminum was utilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. J. Cohen and H. M. Berkowitz, The Nuances of Plate-Slap Testing of Composite Materials, Part II of Final Report: A Study of Plate-Slap Technology, AFML-TR-69–109, Part II, Air Force Materials Laboratory, WrightPatterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, May 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. H. Karnes, The Plate Impact Configuration for Determining Mechanical Properties of Materials at High Strain Rates, Mechanical Behavior of Material Under Dynamic Loads, Edited by U.S. Lindholm, Springer-Verlag, New York (1968) pp. 270–293.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. H. Guenther, D. C. Winsch and T. D. Soapes, Acceleration of Thin Plates by Exploding Foil Techniques, Exploding Wires, Edited by W. G. Chace and H. K. Moore, Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York (1962) pp. 279–298.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. M. Butcher, L. M. Barker, D. E. Munson and C D. Lundergan, Influence of Stress History on Time Dependent Spallation in Metals, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, 2, 6 (1964) 977–990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. R. Penning, D. M. Young and J. H. Prindle, Negative Equation of State and Spall Criteria, RTD-TDR-633039, AD420-509, Air Force Research and Technology Division, September 1963.

  6. J. H. Oscarson and K. F. Graff, Spall Fracture and Dynamic Response of Materials, BAT-197A-4–3, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, March 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. M. Berkowitz and L. J. Cohen, A Critical Evaluation of Plate-Slap Technology, Part I of Final Report: A Study of Plate-Slap Technology, AFML-TR-69–109, Part I, Air Force Materials Laboratory, Wright- Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, May 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. H. Gilman, Dislocation Dynamics and the Response of Materials to Impact Applied Mechanics Reviews, 21, 8, (1968).

  9. F. R. Tuler and B. M. Butcher, A Criterion for the Time-Dependence of Dynamic Fracture, International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, 4 (1968) 486.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. C. Peck, H. M. Berkowitz and L. J. Cohen, The Relationship of the Critical Stress vs. Impulse Theory of Spall Fracture to Stress Gradient or Stress-Rate Theories, International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, 5 (1969) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. L. Warnica and J. A. Charest, Spallation Thresholds of Quartz-Phenolic, BSD-TR-67–24, Ballistic Systems Division, Norton Air Force Base, Calif., February 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. B. Breed, C. L. Mader and D. Venable, Technique for the Determination of Dynamic-Tensile-Strength Characteristics, Journal of Applied Physics, 38 (1967) 3271.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Christman, Private Communication, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan.

  14. Capt. S. Doane, Private Communication, Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

  15. H. Eyring, Viscosity, Plasticity and Diffusion as Examples of Absolute Reaction Rates, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 4 (1936) 283.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. J. Cohen and O. Ishai, Delayed Yielding of Three-Phase Epoxy Composites, Meeting Preprint 711, ASCE Annual Meeting and National Meeting of Structural Engineering, September 30-October 4, 1968, Pittsburgh, Pa. J. ASCE-EM, Vol. 96, EM6, Dec. 1970, 867.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. Ishai and L. J. Cohen, Effect of Fillers and Voids on Compressive Yield of Epoxy Composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 2, 3 (1968) 302–315.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. R. Baca, Determination of Spallation Thresholds by Exploding Foils, Air Force Institute of Technology, WrightPatterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. R. Tuler, Private Communication, Effects Technology Inc., Santa Barbara, California.

  20. W. Hermann, E. A. Witmer, J. H. Percy and A. H. Jones, Stress Wave Propagation and Spallation in Uniaxial Strain, ASD-TDR-62–399, AD288–885, Air Force Systems Command, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, September 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Whiteman, Report No. UNDEX 445, Atomic Weapons Research Establishment, England, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Bueche, Physical Properties of Polymers, Interscience Publishers Inc., New York (1962) 246–256.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Z. N. Zhurkov and T. P. Sanfirova, Study of the Time-Temperature Dependence of Mechanical Strength, Soviet Physics-Solid State, 2, 6 (1960) 933–938.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. N. Brodie and J. E. Hormuth, The PUFF-66 and P-PUFF-66 Computer Programs, AFWL-TR-68–48, Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, May 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. W. Davies and J. R. Penning, Report D2–9516, The Boeing Company, Aerospace Division, Seattle, Washington,1968.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. D. Lundergan and W. Hermann, Equation-of-State of 6061-T6 Aluminum at Low Pressure, Journal of Applied Physics, 31 (1963) 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. J. Cohen and H. M. Berkowitz, Dynamic Fracture of a Two Dimensional Reinforced Composite Material Under Stress Wave Loading in Uniaxial Strain, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company—Western Division MDAC-WD No. 1177, June, 1970.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, L.J., Berkowitz, H.M. Time-dependent fracture criteria for 6061-T6 aluminum under stress-wave loading in uniaxial strain. Int J Fract 7, 183–196 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183805

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183805

Keywords

Navigation