Abstract
The necessary assumption that the instantaneous flow field seen by hot-wire probes with two or more sensors is uniform, i.e. that all sensors are cooled by identically the same instantaneous velocity field, is often quite erroneous in highly sheared turbulent flow, such as near the wall in a turbulent boundary layer. Intense local shear layers occur, resulting in large instantaneous velocity gradients across the sensing volume of the probe. The effects of these neglected velocity gradients on the ability of a four-sensor probe, consisting of a pair of orthogonal X-arrays, to measure the three velocity and the streamwise vorticity components is assessed. This is done by determining the synthetic response of the probe to the turbulent boundary layer database of Balint et al. (1991), in which all the velocity gradients are known. The effects of neglecting the binormal components of velocity which cool each sensor are also assessed, when the probe is treated as two uncoupled X-arrays. A small improvement to the probe's coupled X-array response is found when an estimate of the mean wall-normal velocity gradient is incorporated in the response equations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balint, J.-L. 1986: Contribution à l,étude de la structure tourbillonnaire d'une couche limite turbulente au moyen d, une sonde à neuf fils chauds mesurant le rotationnel, Thèse de Docteur d'Etat ès Sciences, Université de Lyon, France
Balint, J.-L. et al. 1987: A study of the vortical structure of the turbulent boundary layer, In: Advances in turbulence (eds Comte-Bellot, G. and Mathieu, J.) 456–464, Springer
Balint, J.-L. et al. 1991 The velocity and vorticity vector field of a turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Statistical properties, J. Fluid. Mech. 228, 53–86
Bradshaw, P. 1975: An introduction to turbulence and its measurements (2nd ed), 121–126, Pergamon Press, Oxford
Bremhorst, K. 1972: The effect of wire length and separation on X-array hot-wire anemometer measurements, IEEE Tran. on instrumentation and measurement Vol IM-21, No 3, 244–248
Browne, L. W. B. et al. 1988: Selection of wires and wire spacing for X-wires. Exp. Fluids 6, 286–288
Jorgensen, F. E. 1971: Directional sensitivity of wire and fiber film probes. DISA Inform. 11, 31–37
Kastrinakis, E. G. et al. 1979: Influence of the flow velocity on a Kovasznay-type vorticity Probe. Rev. Sci. Instrum, 50(6), June, 759–767
Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1950: Quarterly progress report of aero. Dept., Contract NDRD-8036-JHB-39, The Johns Hopkins Univ.
Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1954: Turbulent measurements. In: Physical measurements in gas dynamics and combustion 10, 213, Princeton U. Press
Moin, P.; Spalart, P. R. 1987: Contributions of numerical simulation data base to the physics, modeling, and measurement of turbulence. NASA Tech. Memo. 100022
Spalding, D. B. 1961: A single formula for the law of the wall. J. Appl. Mech. (ASME, 28), 455–457
Suzuki, Y.; Kasagi, N. 1992: Evaluation of hot-wire measurements in wall shear turbulence using a direct numerical simulation database. Exp. Therm. and Fluid Sci. 5, 66–77
Vukoslavčević, P.; Wallace, J. M. 1981: Influence of velocity gradients on measurements of velocity and streamwise vorticity with hot-wire X-array probes. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 869–879
Wyngaard, J. C. 1968: Spatial resolution of the vorticity meter and other hot-wire arrays. J. Phys E: Instrum 2, 983–987
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, SR., Wallace, J.M. The influence of instantaneous velocity gradients on turbulence properties measured with multi-sensor hot-wire probes. Experiments in Fluids 16, 17–26 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188501
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188501