Abstract
The V-shock is identified as the primary mechanism for the acceleration of electrons responsible for the discrete aurora. A brief review of the evidence supporting the V-shock model is given, including the dynamics of auroral striations, anomalous motion of barium plasma at high altitudes and in-situ observations of large electric fields. The V-shock is a nonlinear, n = 0 ion cyclotron mode soliton, Doppler shifted to zero frequency. The V-shock is also shown to be a generalization of the one-dimensional double layer model, which is an ion acoustic soliton Doppler shifted to zero frequency. The essential difference between the double layer theory and the theory for the oblique, current-driven, laminar electrostatic shock is that the plasma dielectric constant in directions perpendicular to the magnetic field is c 2/V /2 a , where V a is the Alfvén velocity; but the plasma dielectric constant parallel to the magnetic field is unity. Otherwise, in the limit that the shock thickness perpendicular to the magnetic field is much larger than an ion gyroradius, the equations describing the double layer and the oblique shock are the same. The V-shock, while accounting for the acceleration of auroral electrons, requires an energy source and mechanism for generating large potential differences perpendicular to the magnetic field. An energy source is the earthward streaming protons coming from the distant magnetospheric tail. It is shown how these protons can be energized by the cross-tail electric field, which is the tailward extension of the polar cap dawn-to-dusk electric field. The local, large cross-field potential differences associated with the V-shock are seen to be the result of a non-linear, E × B drift turbulent cascade which transfers energy from small- to large-scale sizes. Energy at the smallest scale sizes comes from the kinetic energy in the ion cyclotron motion of the earthward streaming protons, which are unstable against the zero-frequency flute-mode instability. The review points out the gaps in our understanding of the mechanism of the diffuse aurora and the mechanism of the auroral substorm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akasofu, S.-I.: 1977, Physics of Magnetospheric Substorms, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, Boston, U.S.A.
Block, L. P. and Fälthammar, C. G.: 1976, An. Geophys. 32, 161.
Boswell, R. W.: 1976, Geophys. Res. Letters 3, 705.
Byers, J. A. and Grewal, M.: Phys. Fluids 13, 1819.
Davidson, R. C.: 1972, Methods in Nonlinear Plasma Theory, Academic Press, New York.
Davis, T. N.: 1978, this issue, p. 77.
DeForest, S. E. and McIlwain, C. E.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 3587.
Frank, L. A.: 1972, in E. R. Dyer (ed.), Critical Problems of Magnetospheric Physics, p. 35, IUCSTP Secretariat, Washington, D. C.
Frank, L. A. and Ackerson, K. L.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 3612.
Frank, L. A., Akerson, K. L., and Lepping, R. P.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 5859.
Fyfe, D., Montgomery, D., and Joyce, G.: 1977, J. Plasma Phys. 17, 369.
Gary, S. P., Montgomery, D., and Swift, D. W.: 1960, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 7524.
Goertz, C. K. and Joyce, G.: 1975, Astrophys. Space Sci. 32, 165.
Gurnett, D. A.: 1972, in E. R. Dyer (ed.), Critical Problems of Magnetospheric Physics, Nat. Acad. Sci., Washington D. C., p. 123.
Gurnett, D. A. and Frank, L. A.: 1977, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 1031.
Hallinan, T. J. and Davis, T. N.: 1976, Planetary Space Sci. 18, 735.
Hardy, D. A., Hills, H. K., and Freeman, J. W.: 1975, Geophys. Res. Letters 2, 167.
Hones, E. W., Jr., Asbridge, J. R., Bame, S. J., and Singer, S.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, 5463.
Hones, E. W., Jr., Bame, S. J., and Asbridge, J. R.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 227.
Kan, J. R.: 1975, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 2689.
Kindel, J. M. and Kennel, C. F.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 3053.
Knorr, G. and Goertz, C. K.: 1974, Astrophys. Space Sci. 31, 209.
Krall, N. A. and Trivelpiece, A. W.: 1973, Principles of Plasma Physics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kraichnan, R. H.: 1967, Phys. Fluids 10, 1417.
Kraichnan, R. H.: 1975, J. Fluid Mech. 67, 155.
Levy, R. H. and Hockney, R. W.: 1968, Phys. Fluids 11, 766.
Lui, A. T. Y., Akasofu, S. -I., Hones, E. W., Jr., Bame, S. J., and McIlwain, C. F.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1415.
Maggs, J. E.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1707.
Montgomery, D. C. and Joyce, G.: 1969, J. Plasma Phys. 3, 1.
Mozer, F. S., Carlson, C. W., Hudson, M. K., Torbert, R. B., Parody, B., Yatteau, J., and Kelley, M. C.: 1977, Phys. Rev. Letters 38, 292.
Papadopoulos, K.: 1977, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 15, 113.
Perkins, F. W.: 1960, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 6631.
Seyler, C. E., Jr., Salu, Y., Montgomery, D., and Knorr, G.: 1975, Phys. Fluids 18, 803.
Stern, D. P. and Palmadesso, P.: 1975, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4244.
Swift, D. W. 1968, J. Geophys. Res. 73.
Swift, D. W. 1975, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 2096.
Swift, D. W. 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 3935.
Swift, D. W. 1977a, J. Geophys. Res. 82, 1288.
Swift, D. W. 1977b, J. Geophys. Res. 82.
Swift, D. W. 1977c, J. Geomag. Geolec., submitted.
Swift, D. W. and Kan, J. R.: 1975, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 985.
Swift, D. W. Stenbaek-Nielsen, H. C., and Hallinin, T. J.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 3931.
Temerin, M. 1978, J. Geophys. Res. 83, 2609.
Torbert, R. B. and Mozer, F. S.: 1978, Geophys. Res. Letters 5, 135.
Wescott, E. M., Rieger, E. P., Stenbaek-Nielsen, H. C., Davis, T. N., Peek, H. M., and Bottoms, P. J.: 1974. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 159.
Wescott, E. M., Stenbaek-Nielsen, H. C., Davis, T. N., Murcray, W. B., Peek, H. M., and Bottoms, P. J.: 1975, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 951.
Wescott, E. M., Stenbaek-Nielsen, H. C., Hallinan, T. J., Davis, T. N., and Peek, H. M.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 4495.
Young, T. S. T., Callen, J. D., and McCune, J. E.: 1971, Phys. Fluids 14, 2783.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swift, D.W. Mechanisms for the discrete aurora — A review. Space Sci Rev 22, 35–75 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215813
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215813