Skip to main content
Log in

‘Vector white noise’: a technique for mapping the motion receptive fields of direction-selective visual neurons

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A technique is described and tested for mapping the sensitivities and preferred directions of motion at different locations within the receptive fields of direction-selective motion-detecting visual neurons. The procedure is to record the responses to a number of visual stimuli, each stimulus presentation consisting of a set of short, randomly-oriented, moving bars arranged in a square grid. Each bar moves perpendicularly to its long axis. The vector describing the sensitivity and preferred direction of motion at each grid location is obtained as a sum of the unit vectors defining the directions of motion of the bars in each of the stimuli at that location, weighted by the strengths of the corresponding responses. The resulting vector field specifies the optimum flow field for the neuron. The advantage of this technique over the conventional approach of probing the receptive field sequentially at each grid location is that the parallel nature of the stimulus is sensitive to nonlinear interactions (such as shunting inhibition for mutual facilitation) between different regions of the visual field. The technique is used to determine accurately the motion receptive fields of direction-selective motion detecting neurons in the optic lobes of insects. It is potentially applicable to motion-sensitive neurons with highly structured receptive fields, such as those in the optic tectum of the pigeon or in area MST of the monkey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dubs A (1982) The spatial integration of signals in the retina and lamina of the fly compound eye under different conditions of luminance. J Comp Physiol 146:321–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak DR, Srinivasan MV, French AS (1980) The contrast sensitivity of fly movement-detecting neurons. Vision Res 20:397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost BJ, Wylie DR, Wang YC (1990) The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accessory optic pathways of birds. Vision Res 30:1677–1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton Miffin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1990) Directional tuning curves, elementary movement detectors and the estimation of the direction of visual movement. Vision Res 30:603–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1982) Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly. II. The horizontal cells: receptive field organization and response characteristics. Biol Cybern 46:67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1984) The lobula plate complex of the fly: structure,function and significance in visual behavior. In: Ali MA (eds) Photoreception and vision in invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York London, Ser 74, pp 523–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K, Egelhaaf M (1989) Neural mechanisms of visual course control in insects. In: Stavenga DG, Hardie RC (eds) Facets of vision. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 391–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson MR, Maddess T, DuBois R (1991) A system of insect neurons sensitive to horizontal and vertical image motion connects the medulla and midbrain. J Comp Physiol 169:355–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin ZF (1991) Computational studies of visual motion processing. Ph. D. thesis, Australian National University 1991

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:617–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddess T, Laughlin SB (1985) Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency. Proc R Soc London Ser B 225:251–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama K (1985) Biological image motion processing: a review. Vision Res 25:625–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis A (1965) Probability, random variables and stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruyter van Steveninck RR de, Zaagman WH, Masterbroek HAK (1986) Adaptation of transient responses of a movement-sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala. Biol Cybern 54:223–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Dvorak DR (1980) Spatial processing of visual information in the movement-detecting pathway of the fly. J Comp Physiol 140:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka K, Yoshiro F, Saito H (1989) Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 62(3):642–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanakou E, Michalak R, Harth E (1979) The Alopex process: visual receptive fields by response feedback. Biol Cybern 35:161–174

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, M.V., Jin, Z.F., Stange, G. et al. ‘Vector white noise’: a technique for mapping the motion receptive fields of direction-selective visual neurons. Biol. Cybern. 68, 199–207 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224852

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224852

Keywords

Navigation