Skip to main content
Log in

Human cyclovergence as a function of stimulus frequency and amplitude

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

By the use of scleral search coils a continuous record of human cyclovergence was obtained while two identical 80° textured patterns, presented dichoptically, oscillated in the frontal plane in counterphase through 1, 3 and 6° of cyclorotation at frequencies between 0.05 and 2 Hz. The amplitude and gain of the response decreased exponentially with increasing stimulus frequency. As stimulus amplitude increased, response amplitude also increased but gain was highest for low-amplitude cyclorotations. For an amplitude of 1° and a frequency of 0.05 Hz the gain reached 0.87 for two subjects. The phase lag increased from a few degrees at a frequency of 0.05 Hz to over 100° at a frequency of 2 Hz. These results suggest that cyclovergence is designed to correct for small, slow drifts in the stereoscopic alignment of the images in the two eyes. Although the disparity in the textured display was not interpreted as slant, it provided a strong stimulus for cyclovergence. The cyclovergence caused a transfer of cyclodisparity into a superimposed vertical line, which was then perceived as slanting in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen MJ, Carter JH (1967) The torsion component of the near response. Am J Optom 44:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames A (1926) Cyclophoria. Am J Physiol Optics 7:3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Amigo G (1974) A vertical horopter. Optica Acta 21:277–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Balliet R, Nakayama K (1978) Training of voluntary torsion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:303–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher GA (1934) Die optokinetische Auslösung von Augen-rollung und rotatorischem Nystagmus. Pflügers Arch Ges Physiol 234:13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Buizza A, Schmid R (1985) New experimental data on cat's optokinetic responses: is there need to revise previous models of the optokinetic reflex? Biol Cybern 51:301–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung BSK, Howard IP (1991) Optokinetic torsion: dynamics and relation to circularvection. Vision Res (in press)

  • Crone RA (1975) Optically induced eye torsion. II. Optostatic and optokinetic cycloversion. Von Graefes Arch Klin Ophthalmol 196:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone RA, Everhard-Halm Y (1975) Optically induced eye torsion. I. Fusional cyclovergence. Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 195:231–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Collewijn H, Van der Steen L, Ferman L, Jansen TC (1985) Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scierai coil recordings. Exp Brain Res 59:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferman L, Collewijn H, Van den Berg AV (1987) A direct test of Listing's law. I. Human ocular torsion measured in static tertiary positions. Vision Res 27:929–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis P, Godaux E, Beaufays J, Henri VP (1984) The optokinetic reflex in the cat: modeling and computer simulation. Biol Cybern 50:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Godaux E, Vanderkelen B (1984) Vestibulo-ocular reflex, optokinetic response and their interactions in the cerebellectomized cat. J Physiol 346:155–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough DR, Sigman E, Oltman PK, Rosso J, Mertz H (1979) Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus. Vision Res 19:1177–1179

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H von (1962) Treatise on physiological optics, Vol 3. Dover, New York, p 408

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, FB and Bielschowsky A (1900) Über die der Willkür entzogenen Fusionsbewegungen der Augen. Pflügers Arch Ges Physiol 80:20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP (1982) Human visual orientation. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP, Templeton WB (1964) Visually induced eye torsion and tilt adaptation. Vision Res 4:433–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz AE (1972) The effect of stimulus complexity on human cyclofusional response. Vision Res 12:699–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertesz AE, Sullivan MJ (1978) The effect of stimulus size on human cyclofusional response. Vision Res 18:567–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Krekling S (1973) Comments on cyclofusional eye movements. Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 188:231–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel A (1868) Über das Vorkommen von wahren Rollungen des Auges um die Gesichtslinie. Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 14:228–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle KN (1946) The binocular depth contrast phenomenon. Am J Psychol 59:111–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle KN, Ellerbrock, VJ (1946) Cyclofusional movements. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 36:700–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrov AP, Zenkin GM (1973) Torsional eye movements and constancy of the visual field. Vision Res 13:2465–2477

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Steen J, van Rijn LJ (1990) The oculomotor control of cyclovergence and cycloversion in humans. In: Proceedings 13th Europ Conf in visual perception. Perception 19:A60

  • Verhoeff FH (1934) Cycloduction. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 32:208–228

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, I.P., Zacher, J.E. Human cyclovergence as a function of stimulus frequency and amplitude. Exp Brain Res 85, 445–450 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229421

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229421

Key words

Navigation