Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro propagation of cashewnut

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vitro plant propagation was developed for seedling shoot tips, leaf axils, and cotyledonary nodes of cashew, Anacardium occidentale. Factors affecting multiplication rate included age of explant source, explant type, medium composition, light requirements, and transfer frequency. Cotyledonary nodes produced more buds than other explant types. Nodes had a 90% viability when transferred daily to fresh medium containing activated charcoal for 7 d while exposed to continuous dark. Cultures were then exposed to low light illumination with weekly transfers. The phytohormone composition producing the most buds was 2.32 μM kinetin, 9.12 μM zeatin and 4.40 μM BA. The highest frequency of rooted shoots was obtained by treating shoots with the bacterium, Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plants also were recovered by induction of roots using auxin treatment on propagated shoots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Kn:

Kinetin

Zn:

Zeatin

BA:

N6-Benzyladenine

2iP:

(2-Isopentenyl) adenine

BPA:

n-Benzyl -9 (2-tetrahydro-pyrany l) adenine

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

IBA:

Indole-3-butyric acid

NAA:

1-Naphthalene acetic acid

TIBA:

2,3,5-Tri-iodo-benzoic acid

References

  • Ammirato PV, Evans DA, Sharp WR, Yamada Y (eds) (1984) Hand book of Plant Cell Culture, vol 3, Crop species, Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barghchi M, Alderson PG (1983) Acta Hort 131: 49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassil NV, Proebsting WM, Moore LW, Lightfoot DA (1991) Hort Sci 26: 1058–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome OC, Zimmerman RH (1978) Hort Sci 13: 151–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res 50: 151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jha TB (1988) Ind J Exp Biol 26: 505–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Litz RE, Knight RJ, Gazit S (1984) Scientia Hort 22: 233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli A (1988) Acta Hort 227: 436–437

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee BJ, White EE, Pelcher LE, Lapp MS (1993) Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 34: 53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagbhusanam S, Menon MA (1980) The Plant Propagator 26: 11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Patena L, Sutter EG, Dandekar AM (1988) Acta Hort 227: 324–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit A, David C, Dahl G, Ellis JG, Guyon P, Casse-Delbart F, Tempe J (1983) Mol Gen Genet 190: 204–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillip VJ (1984) Ann Bot 54: 149

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper W, Zimmer K (1976) Acta Hort 64: 21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF, Murashige T (1979) In Vitro 15: 383–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson JA (1986) Tropical fruits. Longmann Inc, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk RU, Hildebrandt AC (1972) Can J Bot 50: 199–204

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spano L, Pomponi M, Van-Slogteren GMS, Tempe J (1982) Plant Mol Biol 9: 19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Snir I (1981) Scientia Hort 14: 139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepfer D (1989) In: Kosuge T, Nester EW (eds), Plant microbe interactions, molecular and genetic perspectives. Mc-Graw Hill Publishing, NY, pp 296–342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. C. Phillips

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, S., Jha, T.B. & Jha, S. In vitro propagation of cashewnut. Plant Cell Reports 15, 615–619 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232464

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232464

Keywords

Navigation