Summary
-
1.
A general purpose, digital computer was employed to map quantitatively the receptive fields of units in cat's striate cortex.
-
2.
Receptive fields were studied as a function of barbiturate anesthetic level under dark adapted conditions.
-
3.
Receptive fields obtained from lateral geniculate axons were topographically simple and usually represented a single peak with concentric zones of decreasing excitability. Such fields were stable under all anesthetic and electroencephalographic conditions.
-
4.
Responses were recorded from striate cells, both simple and complex in the sense of Hubel and Wiesel. These demonstrated varied field configurations such as an excitatory cylinder in an inhibitory field, excitatory vertical axis flanked by asymmetric inhibitory areas, and more complex patterns including potentially direction and velocity sensitive ones.
-
5.
Many cortical maps were unstable over time, especially in the presence of low voltage, fast electroencephalographic activity. Changes were not random nor did they represent simple linear displacements of peaks, but included axis shifts, gradient change, and expansion or contraction of excitatory and inhibitory zones with centers at fixed relative positions.
-
6.
Heavy barbiturate anesthesia and spontaneous spindling in the EEG markedly reduced the variability in these maps; the encephale isole preparation was more stable than spinally intact animals. This association suggests a role of the midbrain reticular formation in cortical variability.
-
7.
Random rather than iterative presentation of matrix points resulted in higher mean firing rates and more stable receptive fields, probably the result of photochemical recovery in dispersed receptors and time averaging of cellular excitability.
-
8.
When stability was analyzed as a function of time interval of response (early on, late on, early off, late off), initial on responses were often more stable than longer latency late on- or off-responses. This factor, among others discussed, makes eye movement an unlikely explanation for map variability. It suggests additionally that late on- and off- responses represent input to the cortical cell from units other than those producing the early on-response.
-
9.
The effects of pentobarbital, in addition to stabilization of the receptive field, included striking phase reversals in which inhibitory regions became excitatory and visa versa. Firing rate often changed substantially, but both increases and decreases were observed.
-
10.
It is argued that visual response under pentobarbital is a special and not the general case of visual perception and that sequential receptive field changes during aroused brain states reflect integrative, purposive processes at the cortical level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akimoto, H., Saito, Y., Nakamura, Y.: The Visual System. Ed. by R. Jung. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1961.
Baumgartner, G., Brown, J.L., Schultz, A.: Responses of single units of the cat visual system to rectangular stimulus patterns. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 1–18 (1965).
Bishop, P.O., Burke, W., Davis, R.: The identification of single units in central visual pathways. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 162, 409–431 (1962).
Chi, C.C., Flynn, J.P.: The effects of hypothalamic and reticular stimulation on evoked responses in the visual system of the cat. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 24, 343–356 (1968).
Creutzfeldt, O., Ito, M.: Functional synaptic organization of primary visual cortex neurons in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 324–352 (1968).
Ervin, F.R., Saito, Y., Martin, R.M.: Analysis of unitary receptive field of cat's striate: cortical neurons in respect to multiple components of a response. AF Tech. report, AF laboratories: Cambridge, Mass. (1967).
Granit, R.: Centrifugal and antidromic effects on ganglion cells of retina. J. Neurophysiol. 18, 388–411 (1955).
Hernandex-Peon, R., Scherrer, H., Velasco, M.: Central influences on afferent conduction in the somatic and visual pathways. Acta neurol. lat.-mear. 2, 8–22 (1956).
Horn, G., Hill, R.M.: Modifications of receptive fields of cells in the visual cortex occuring spontaneously and associated with body tilt. Nature (Lond.) 221, 186–188 (1969).
Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields of optic nerve fibers in the Spider monkey. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 154, 572–580 (1960).
— Receptive field binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106–154 (1962).
— Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens. J. Neurophysiol. 26, 894–1002 (1963).
Iwama, K., Kawamoto, T., Sakamura, H., Kasamatsu, T.: Responsiveness of cat lateral geniculate at pre-and postsynaptic levels during natural sleep. Physiol. Behav. 1, 45–53 (1966).
Langley, T.D., Siegel, J.: Visual and auditory evoked potentials: specificity of reticular formation modulating influences. Experientia (Basel) 24, 353–354 (1968).
Malcolm, L.J., Bruce, I.S.C., Burke, W.: Excitability of the lateral geniculate nucleus in the alert, non-alert and sleeping cat. Exp. Brain Res. 10, 283–297 (1970).
McIlwain, J.T.: Receptive fields of optic tract axons and lateral geniculate cells: peripheral extent and barbiturate sensitivity. J. Neurophysiol. 27, 1154–1173 (1964).
Morrell, F., Naquet, R., Gastaut, H.: Evolution of some electrical signs of conditioning. Part I. Normal cat and rabbit. J. Neurophysiol. 20, 574–587 (1957).
Mukhametov, L., Rizzolatti, G.: Effect of sleep and waking on flash evoked discharges of lateral geniculate units in unrestrained cats. Brain Res. 13, 404–406 (1969).
Nakai, Y., Domino, E.F.: Reticular facilitation of visually evoked responses by optic tract stimulation before and after enucleation. Exp. Neurol. 22, 532–544 (1968).
Robertson, A.D.J.: Anaesthesia and Receptive Fields. Nature (Lond.) 205, 80 (1965).
Rodieck, R.W., Pettigrew, J.D., Bishop, P.O., Nakara, T.: Residual eye movements in receptive field studies of paralyzed cats. Vision Res. 7, 107–110 (1967).
Sasaki, H.: Receptive field of striate neurons in waking cats. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 27, 674 (1969).
Satinsky, D.: Reticular influences on lateral geniculate neuron activity. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 25, 543–549 (1968).
Schmidt, R., Creutzfeldt, O.D.: Veränderung von Sponsanaktivität und Reizantwort retinaler und genicularer Neurone der Katze bei fraktionlenter Injektion von Pentobarbital-na. Pflügers Arch. 350, 129–147 (1968).
Sierra, G., Fuster, J.M.: Facilitation of secondary visual evoked responses by stimulatin of limbic structure. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 25, 274–278 (1968).
Spinelli, D.N.: Receptive field organization of ganglion cells in the cat's retina. Exp. Neurol. 19, 291–315 (1967).
Thomas, J., Groves, P., Verzeano, M.: The activity of neurons in the lateral geniculate body during wakefulness and natural sleep. Experientia (Basel) 24, 360–362 (1986).
Weingarten, M., Spinelli, D.N.: Retinal receptive field changes produced by auditory and somatic stimulation. Exp. Neurol. 15, 363–376 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by AF33(615)-5453 and AF 49(643)-201 and the Digital Equipment Corporation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bear, D.M., Sasaki, H. & Ervin, F.R. Sequential change in receptive fields of striate neurons in dark adapted cats. Exp Brain Res 13, 256–272 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234949
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234949