Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We obtained movement detection thresholds for two-dimensional random speck-patterns (“Julesz” patterns) homogeneously moving over the whole target field (5.21×5.31 degrees of visual angle). We alternated between two uncorrelated but otherwise similar patterns, one moving with velocity →v1, the other with velocity →v2, such that each pattern was on for T ms. We masked this pattern (signal) with spatio-temporal white noise (“snow”). The total r.m.s. contrast was kept constant, whereas the ratio of the r.m.s. contrasts of signal and noise was varied. The square of this ratio was designated SNR.

At low SNR values the pattern was not perceptually different from the snow alone. At high SNR values the subject detected spatio-temporal correlation (e.g., movement). In these experiments we determined the threshold SNR values as a measure of the detectability of spatio-temporal correlation as a function of the parameters T, →v1 and →v2.

When →v1 and →v2 were sufficiently dissimilar one of three percepts occurred: for very large T the alternation could be followed, for very small T two transparent, simultaneously moving sheets of noise-pattern with different velocities could be seen. For intermediate T-values no systematic movement at all could be observed. At these T-values the threshold SNR was maximal. This “critical” T-value decreased with increasing velocity.

We found that it was possible to have more than one percept of uniform smooth movement at a single location in the visual field if these movements had velocity vectors with an angular difference of at least 30 deg or if their magnitudes differed by at least a factor of 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler B, Grüsser O-J (1979) Apparent movement and appearance of periodic stripes during eye movements across a stroboscopically illuminated random dot pattern. Exp Brain Res 37: 537–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow HB, Levick WR (1965) The mechanism of directionally sensitive units in rabbits retina. J Physiol (Lond) 178: 477–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell HH, Lappin JS (1973) Sufficient conditions for the discrimination of motion. Percept Psychophys 14: 45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddick O (1974) A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Res 14: 519–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke PGH (1977) Subjective standstill caused by the interaction of moving patterns. Vision Res 17: 1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster DH (1971a) The response of the human visual system to moving spatially-periodic patterns: further analysis. Vision Res 11: 57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster DH (1971b) A model of the human visual system in its response to certain classes of moving stimuli. Kybernetik 8: 69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham CH (ed) (1965) Vision and visual perception. Wiley, New York London Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüsser-Cornehls U (1968) Response of movement-detecting neurons of the frog's retina to moving patterns under stroboscopic illumination. Pflügers Arch 303: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz B (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, Doorn AJ van (1980) Dual percept of movement and spatial periodicity in stroboscopically illuminated moving noise patterns. J Opt Soc Am 70: 456–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappin JS, Bell HH (1976) The detection of coherence in moving random-dot patterns. Vision Res 16: 161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson E, Sekuler R (1976) Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion. Vision Res 16: 779–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MJ, Ward R (1980) Conditions for motion flow in dynamic visual noise. Vision Res 20: 431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Nes FL van, Koenderink JJ, Nas H, Bouman MA (1967) Spatiotemporal modulation transfer in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 57: 1082–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Orban GA, Callens M (1977) Influence of movement parameters on area 18 neurones in the cat. Exp Brain Res 30: 125–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt W (1961) Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In: Rosenblith WA (ed) Sensory communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 303–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten JF (1967) Subjective stroboscopy and a model of visual movement detectors. In: Wathen-Dunn W (ed) Models for the perception of speech and visual form. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 44–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Pure Research (Z.W.O.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Doorn, A.J., Koenderink, J.J. Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Exp Brain Res 45, 179–188 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235777

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00235777

Key words

Navigation