Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical pharmacology of bruceantin by radioimmunoassay

  • Original Articles
  • Bruceantin
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

During the phase I clinical trial of a new antitumor agent, bruceantin, the pharmacology was studied in 18 cancer patients. The drug was infused intravenously (IV) for 3 h at doses ranging from 1 to 3.6 mg/m2 per day for 5 days. The plasma drug disappearance curves were biphasic, with a fast initial half-life of less than 15 min. The second half-life (t1/2β) varied from 0.7 to 38 h among different patients and was not dose-related. The difference between the t1/2β on day 1 and that on day 5 was not significant. In patients with normal liver function, the mean plasma concentration at the end of infusion was 22 ng/ml, and the value of the area under the concentration x time curve (AUC) was 111 (ng/ml)h. In contrast, in patients with abnormal liver function the corresponding values were 115 ng/ml and 830 (ng/ml)h, respectively. In addition, these patients had a slower elimination half-life of 10.9 h and a decreased total clearance of 157. ml/min/m2, as compared with 2.6 h and 671 ml/min/m2, respectively, for the normal group. All these differences were statistically significant.

Patients with abnormal liver function developed more severe toxicity, including fever, severe nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. Two patients with severe hepatic dysfunction received a reduced dose and developed no toxicity. These results demonstrated the importance of the effects of liver dysfunction on drug disposition and showed that the dosage should be reduced in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bedikian AY, Valdivieso M, Bodey GP, Freireich EJ (1979) Initial clinical studies with bruceantin. Cancer Treat Rep 63:1843

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castles TR, Bhandari JC, Lee CC, et al. (1976) Preclinical toxicologic evaluation of bruceantin (NSC 165563) in mice, dogs, and monkeys. U.S. National Technical Information Service, Springfield (PB-257175), p 348

    Google Scholar 

  3. Douros J, Suffness M (1978) New natural products of interest under development at the National Cancer Institute. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1:91

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fong KLL, Ho DHW, Carter CJK, Brown NS, Benjamin RS, Freireich EJ, Bodey GP Sr (1980) Radioimmunoassay for the detection and quantitation of bruceantin. Anal Biochem 105:281

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fresno M, Gonzales A, Vazques D, Jimenez A (1978) Bruceantin, a novel inhibitor of peptide bond formation. Biochim Biophys Acta 518:104

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garnick MB, Blum RH, Canellos GP, Mayer RJ, Parker L, Skarin AT, Li FP, Henderson C, Frei E III (1979) Phase I trial of bruceantin. Cancer Treat Rep 63:1929

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hartwell JL (1976) Types of anticancer agents isolated from plants. Cancer Treat Rep 60:1031

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kupchan SM, Britton RW, Ziegler MF, Sigel CW (1973) Bruceantin, a new potent antileukemic simaroubolide from Brucea antidysenterica. J Org Chem 38:178

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kupchan SM, Britton RW, Lacadie JA, Ziegler MF, Sigel CW (1975) The isolation and structural elucidation of bruceantin and bruceantinol, new potent antileukemic quassinoids from Brucea antidysenterica. J Org Chem 46:648

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liao LL, Kupchan SM, Horwitz SB (1976) Mode of action of the antitumor compound bruceantin, an inhibitor of protein synthesis. Mol Pharmacol 12:167

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liesmann J, Belt RJ, Haas CD, Hoogstraten B (1981) Phase I study on bruceantin administered on a weekly schedule. Cancer Treat Rep 65:883

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loo JCK, Riegelmann S (1970) Assessment of pharmacokinetic constants from post-infusion blood curves obtained after IV infusion. J Pharm Sci 59:53

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ritschel WA (1976) Pharmacokinetics of single dose administration. In: Handbook of basic pharmacokinetics. Drug Intelligence, Hamilton, p 201

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Assumption of analysis of variance: In: Biometry, the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, p 391

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suling WJ, Woolley CW, Shannon WM (1979) Disposition and metabolism of bruceantin in the mouse. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 3:171

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilkinson GR, Schenker S (1975) Drug disposition and liver disease. Drug Metab Rev 4:139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fong, K.L.L., Ho, D.H.W., Benjamin, R.S. et al. Clinical pharmacology of bruceantin by radioimmunoassay. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 9, 169–172 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257747

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257747

Keywords

Navigation