This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
AndersonA. R. and BelnapN. D.: 1961, ‘Enthymemes’, Journal of Philosophy 58, 713–723.
AndersonA. R. and BelnapN. D.: 1975, Entailment, Princeton U.P., Princeton.
MeyerR. K. and RoutleyR.: 1972, ‘Algebraic analysis of entailment’, Logique et Analyse 15, 407–428.
MoorG.: 1920, ‘External and internal relations’, Proc. Aristotelean Soc. n.s. 20, 40–62.
PriestG.: 1979a, ‘Logic of paradox’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 219–241.
PriestG.: 1979b, ‘Indefinite descriptions’, Logic et analyse 22, 5–21.
PriestG.: 1979c, ‘Two dogmans of Quineanism’, Philosophical Quarterly 29, 289–301.
RoutleyR.: 1977, ‘Ultralogic as universal’, Relevance Logic Newsletter 2, 50–89, 138–175.
RoutleyR., MeyerR. and DunnJ. M.: 1979, ‘Curry's paradox’ Analysis 39, 124–128.
SalmonW.: 1966, Scientific Inference, Pittsburg U.P. Pittsburgh.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am grateful to Chris Mortensen for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Priest, G. Sense, entailment and Modus ponens . J Philos Logic 9, 415–435 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262864
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262864