Summary
A major objective of the CIMMYT Maize Program is to develop open-pollinated varieties of maize (Zea mays L.) that are well adapted to a wide range of environments. To achieve this breeding goal, it is essential that the program use a stability technique that will identify high-yielding, stable genotypes accurately in international trials conducted under different environmental conditions. The objective of this study was to compare a spatial method with a modified conventional regression analysis method to determine the yield stability of 27 CIMMYT maize varieties evaluated at 37 locations. The methods also were compared on the basis of their consistency in assessing the stability of varieties when certain locations were omitted, and when subsets of varieties were analyzed. The varieties found to be stable by the spatial method with all sites included in the analysis were also stable (1) when the lowest and highest yielding sites were excluded from the analyses, and (2) when the varieties were considered, along with others, as a subset of the original group of materials. Stability parameters determined by regression analysis, however, varied for some varieties when (1) extreme sites were excluded, and (2) a subset of entries was considered in isolation. Because the spatial method was more consistent in identifying high-yielding stable varieties, it was considered the more useful of the two methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker RJ (1969) Genotype-environment interaction in yields of wheat. Can J Plant Sci 49:743–751
Byth DE, Eisemann RL, De Lacy IH (1976) Two-way pattern analysis of a large data set to evaluate genotype adaptation. Heredity 37:189–201
Crossa J, Westcott B, Gonzalez C (1988) The yield stability of maize genotypes across international environments. Full season tropical maize. Exp Agric (in press)
Easton HS, Clements RJ (1973) The interaction of wheat genotypes with a specific factor of the environment. J Agric Sci 80:43–52
Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40
Finlay KW, Wilkinson GH (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–754
Freeman GH, Perkins JM (1971) Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. VIII. Relation between genotypes grown in different environments and measure of these environments. Heredity 27:15–23
Gauch HG (1985) Integrating additive and multiplicative models for analysis of yield trials with assessment of predictive success. Mimeo 85-7, Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent roots and vectors used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325–338
Hardwick RC, Wood JT (1972) Regression methods for studying genotype-environment interactions. Heredity 28:209–222
Havener RD (1983) CIMMYTs maize improvement research program. In: Gordon DT, Knoke JK, Nault LR, Ritter RM (eds) Proc. Int Maize Virus Disease Colloq Workshop, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, pp 3–11
Hill J (1975) Genotype X environment interactions: a challenge for plant breeding. J Agric Sci 85:477–493
Hill RR, Baylor JE (1983) Genotype X environment interaction analysis for yield in alfalfa. Crop Sci 23:811–815
Johnson EC (1974) Maize improvement. World-wide maize improvement in the 1970's and the role of CIMMYT, 22–26 April. El Batan, Mexico
Knight R (1970) The measurement and interpretation of genotype-environment interaction. Euphytica 19:225–235
Lin CS, Binns MR, Lefkovitch LP (1986) Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci 26:894–900
Mead R, Riley J, Dear K, Singh SP (1986) Stability comparison of intercropping and monocropping systems. Biometrics 42:253–266
Paliwal RL, Sprague EW (1981) Improving adaptation and yield dependability in maize in the developing world. FAO Technical Conference on Improved Seed Production. Nairobi, Kenya
Vasal SK, Ortega A, Pandey S (1982) CIMMYTs maize germplasm management, improvement, and utilization program. CIMMYT, El Batán, México
Verma MM, Chahal GS, Murty BR (1978) Limitations of conventional regression analysis: a proposed modification. Theor Appl Genet 53:89–91
Westcott B (1986) Some methods of analyzing genotype-environment interaction. Heredity 56:243–253
Westcott B (1987) A method of assessing the yield stability of crop genotypes. J Agric Sci 108:267–274
Witcombe JR, Whittington WJ (1971) A study of the genotype by environmental interaction shown by germinating seeds of Brasica napus. Heredity 26:397–411
Yates F, Cochran WG (1938) The analysis of a group of experiments. J Agric Sci 28:556–580
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by A. R. Hallauer
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crossa, J. A comparison of results obtained with two methods for assessing yield stability. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 75, 460–467 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276750
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276750