Skip to main content
Log in

ore2, a mutation affecting proline biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, leads to a cdc phenotype

  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We report here the isolation of temperature-sensitive mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae which exhibit cdc phenotypes. The recessive mutations defined four complementation groups, named ore1, ore2, ore3 and ore4. At the non-permissive temperature, strains bearing these mutations arrested in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. The wild-type allele of the gene altered in ore2 mutants was cloned. The nucleotide sequence of a fragment which can complement the mutation showed the presence of an open reading frame capable of encoding a protein with 286 amino acid residues. The deduced amino acid sequence showed 25% identity with that of the Escherichia coli Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase, an enzyme of the pathway for the biosynthesis of proline. The ore2 mutants, correspondingly, were found to be capable of growing at the non-permissive temperature on a synthetic medium supplemented with proline. In addition, the chromosomal location of the gene and its restriction map were compatible with those previously reported for the PRO3 gene which encodes the S. cerevisiae Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedard DP, Singer RA, Johnston GC (1981) New mutations in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae affecting completion of “Start”. Curr Genet 9:447

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandriss MC (1979) Isolation and preliminary characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proline auxotrophs. J Bacteriol 138:816–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutch CE, Parry JM (1974) Spheroplast formation in yeast during the transition from exponential phase to stationary phase. J Gen Microbiol 80:259–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutch AH, Smith CJ, Rushlow KE, Kretschmer PJ (1982) Escherichia coli Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase: gene sequence, protein overproduction and purification. Nucleic Acids Res 10:7701–7714

    Google Scholar 

  • Drebot MA, Johnston GC, Singer RA (1987) A yeast mutant conditionally defective only for recentry into the mitotic cell cycle from stationary phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:7948–7952

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink GR (1970) Biochemical genetics of yeast. Methods Enzymol 17:59–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwiger JA, Wittenberg K, Richardson HE, De Barros Lopes M, Reed SI (1989) A family of cyclin homologs that control the G1 phase in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6255–6259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell LH, Culotti J, Pringle JR, Reid BJ (1974) Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast: a model. Science 183:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins CF, Cairney J, Stirling DA, Sutherland L, Booth IR (1987) Osmotic regulation of gene expression: ionic strength as an intracellular signal? Trends Biochem Sci 12:339–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Iida H, Yahara I (1984) Specific early-G1 blocks accompanied with stringent response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae lead to growth arrest in resting state similar to the G0 of higher eucaryotes. J Cell Biol 98:1185–1193

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito H, Yasuki F, Kousaku M, Akira K (1983) Transformation of intact yeast cells with alkali cations. J Bacteriol 153: 163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorincz AT (1984) Rapid plasmid preparation from yeast. Focus 6:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCue KF, Hanson AD (1990) Drought and salt tolerance: towards understanding and application. Trends Biotechnol 8, 12:358–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuris P, Lacroute F, Slonimski PP (1967) Etude systématique de mutants inhibés par leurs propres métabolites chez la levure Saccharomyces cerevisiae, I. Obtention et caractérisation des différentes classes de mutants. Genetics 56:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JJ (1989) Sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The Yeasts, vol 3: Metabolism and Physiology of Yeasts. Academic Press, London, pp 489–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederberger P, Aebi M, Hütter R (1983) Influence of the general control of amino acid biosynthesis on cell growth and cell viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol 129:2571–2583

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce JS (1977) Recommended methods of analysis. The Institute of Brewing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñon R (1978) Folded chromosomes in non-cycling yeast cells. Evidence for a characteristic G0 form. Chromosoma 67:263–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñon R, Pratt D (1980) Folded chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Comparison of response to sporulation medium, arrest at start, and G0 arrest. Chromosoma 81:379–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Plesset J, Ludwig JR, Cox BS, McLaughlin CS (1987) Effect of cell cycle position on thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 169:779–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle JR (1978) The use of conditional lethal cell cycle mutants for temporal and functional sequence mapping of cell cycle events. J Cell Physiol 95:393

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed SI (1980) The selection of S. cerevisiae mutants defective in the Start event of cell division. Genetics 95:561–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilo B, Simchen G, Pardee AB (1978) Regulation of cell cycle initiation in yeast by nutrients and protein synthesis. J Cell Physiol 97:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow J (1966) An enrichment method for auxotrophic yeast mutants using the antibiotic nystatin. Nature 211:206–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomenchok DM, Brandriss MC (1987) Gene-enzyme relationships in the proline biosynthetic pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 169:5364–5372

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger MW, Hartwell LH (1976) Control of cell division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by methionyl-tRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:1664–1668

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton EF, Carter BL, Pringle JR (1979) An enrichment method for temperature-sensitive and auxotrophic mutants of yeast. Mol Gen Genet 171:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheals AE (1987) Biology of the cell cycle in yeasts. The Yeasts vol 1, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg C, Sugimoto K, Reed SI (1990) G1-specific cyclins of S. cerevisiae: Cell cycle periodicity, regulation by mating pheromone, and association with the p34CDC28 protein kinase. Cell 62:225–237

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by C.P. Hollenberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neuville, P., Aigle, M. ore2, a mutation affecting proline biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, leads to a cdc phenotype. Molec. Gen. Genet. 234, 193–200 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00283839

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00283839

Key words

Navigation