Skip to main content
Log in

Gender specificity in value structures

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Separate factor analyses of the value rankings of 53 male and 77 female college students yielded three factors for each gender. Interpretation suggested “Creative Self-Determination versus Submissive Dependency,” “Personal Gratification versus Sociopolitical Consciousness,” and “Existential Responsibility versus Traditionalism” as core concepts for the female respondents; while males' axiological dimensions were labeled “Communal Idealism versus Entrepreneural Pragmatism,” “Hedonism versus Egalitarianism,” and “Sybaritic Bohemianism versus Traditional Sobriety.” Each pole of the female factors was interpreted as reflecting a major ideological referent component of the Women's Liberation Movement, while male factors were construed as constituting perspectives for interpreting varieties of response to feminist ideology. Techniques for increasing individuals' levels of self-actualization by direct intervention in axiological organization were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. Training the woman to know her place: The power of a non-conscious ideology. In D. J. Bem (Ed.), Beliefs, attitudes and human affairs. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, M. The political economy of women's liberation. In M. H. Garskoff (Ed.), Roles women play: Readings toward women's liberation. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, L. The existential analysis school of thought. In R. May, G. Angel, & H. F. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence. New York: Basic Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C. Born female: The high cost of keeping women down. New York: McKay, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, M. Psychoanalysis and Daseinanalysis. New York: Basic Books, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. Exploration in cognitive dissonance. New York: Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. Factor analysis. New York: Harper, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. Handbook for the Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherniss, C. Personality and ideology: A personological study of women's liberation. Psychiatry, 1972, 35(2), 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, V. The next great moment in history is ours. In D. Babcox & M. Belkin (Eds.), Liberation now! New York: Dell, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. When not to factor analyze. In D. N. Jackson & S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in human assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, M. S. Femininity and successful achievement: A basic inconsistency. In J. M. Bardwick, E. Douvan, M. Horner, & D. Guttman (Eds.), Feminine personality and conflict. Belmont, Calif.: Books/Cole, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, F. The education of women. In D. Babcox & M. Belkin (Eds.), Liberation now! New York: Dell, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joesting, J. Comparison of women's liberation members with their nonmember peers. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29(3, Pt. 2), 1291–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 1958, 23, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D., & Huffman, P. Traditional family ideology and its relation to personality. Journal of Personality, 1955, 23, 251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. P. Instrumental and terminal values: Some new developments. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1974, 4, 123. (Ms. No. 767)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. An analysis of the axiological structures of traditional and proliberation men and women. Journal of Psychology, 1975, 90, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Katz, G. M. Value structures and orientations to social institutions. Journal of Psychology, 1976, 93, 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. Women: The longest revolution. In D. Babcox & M. Belkin (Eds.), Liberation now! New York: Dell, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, S. A. The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. Value survey. Sunnyvale, Calif.: Halgren Tests, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. Long-range experimental modification of values, attitudes and behavior. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 453–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzman-Webb, M. The new women. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoloff, C. Who joins women's liberation? Psychiatry, 1973, 36(3), 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstein, N. Psychology constructs the female, or the fantasy life of the male psychologist. In M. H. Garskoff (Ed.), Roles women play. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahoney, J., Heretick, D.M.L. & Katz, G.M. Gender specificity in value structures. Sex Roles 5, 311–318 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287398

Keywords

Navigation