Skip to main content
Log in

Lateralness in women's work: New views on success

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from a longitudinal study of postbaccalaureate nursing careers are discussed in the context of the motive-to-avoid-success controversy. Two groups of nurses with continuous work histories were intensively studied. While most had experienced upward professional mobility, a significant minority had “lateral” careers, which, though not characterized by advancement, typically provide rewards of intensification. Further, lateral careers only occurred in specialties allowing a high degree of professional autonomy. Thus, upward mobility and advancement should not be the sole criteria of women's occupational progress. Alternative conceptions of success may be significant in many occupations, although such beliefs may not serve as viable substitutes for professional autonomy and the opportunity for personal development. Lateral movement may also characterize most men's work lives more aptly than descent or ascent; hence the findings underscore the necessity to rethink the image of movement in both male and female work spheres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Nurses' Association. Facts about nursing. Kansas City, Mo.: American Nurses Association, 1972–1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carden, M. L. The new feminist movement. New York: Russell Sage, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condry, J., & Dyer, S. Fear of success: Attribution of cause to victim. Journal of Social Issues 1976, 32(3), 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmark, F. (Ed.). Who discriminates against women. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depner, C. E., & O'Leary, V. Understanding female careerism: Fear of success and new directions. Sex Roles 1976, 2(3), 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggan, F. Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist 1954, 56 743–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. Woman's place. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., & Engel, G. Authority and expertise: Threats and barriers to occupational autonomy. In P. L. Stewart & M. G. Cantor (Eds.), Varieties of work experience. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, 1974. Pp. 325–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hole, J., & Levine, E. Rebirth of feminism. New York: Quadrangle, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, M. S. Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues 1972, 28(2), 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenney, E. Women's self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin 1977, 84(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, E. Feminist ideology and the meaning of work. Catalyst 1977, 10–11 78–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, M. The gamesman: The new corporation leader. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, M. On congenial truths: A sociology of knowledge perspective on women's studies. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 1977, 14(1), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, V. Costs, continuity and crisis: The story of a competence-based nursing program at Mt. Hood Community College. In G. Grant (Ed.), On competence. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1979. Pp. 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, J. Work and the quality of life: Resource papers for work in America. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. Psychological and social barriers to women on the job. Address delivered to the North Carolina Federation of Business and Professional Women's Clubs, Chapel Hill, February 20, 1971.

  • Tresemer, D. Cumulative record of research on fear of success. Sex Roles 1976, 2(3), 217–236. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresemer, D. Do women fear success? Signs 1976, 1(4), 863–874. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical abstract, 1976. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Work in America. Report of a special task force to the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. S. Women in the professions: Psychological and social barriers to women in science. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective. Palo Alto, Calif.: Mayfield, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research upon which this paper is based was supported by a grant from the Nursing Resources Division, USPHS (Grant NU-004-94-03) for the study of Post-Baccalaureate Careers in Nursing, Fred Davis and Virginia Olesen, Principal Investigators, Ellen Lewin, Assistant Project Director. This article was originally presented as a paper at the Pacific Sociological Association meetings, Sacramento, California, April 1977, where the panel commentator, Sheryl Ruzek, provided useful comments on the essay. Jane Tabata Usami provided a very helpful bibliographic search and other technical assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewin, E., Olesen, V. Lateralness in women's work: New views on success. Sex Roles 6, 619–629 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287892

Keywords

Navigation