Skip to main content
Log in

Dimensions of same-gender student-faculty role-model relationships

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated factors important in the establishment of same-gender student-faculty role-model relationships. Subjects were 33 females and 24 male graduate students enrolled in the same academic department who responded anonymously to scales assessing four characteristics of the role model (personal attributes, life-style and values, power and influence, and professional achievement), three parallel areas of perceived similarity between student and role model (personality, attitudes and values, and professional goals), and students' self-esteem and achievement orientation. As predicted, female students rated the role-model relationship as more important to their professional development than did male students and rated the model's personal attributes and the model's life-style and values as more important in selecting a role model. Consistent with recent theoretical views, female and male students rated both the professional skills and the personal characteristics of the faculty role model as important in establishing the role-model relationship. These findings are interpreted within a framework that considers the continuing effect of belief systems about women's and men's roles on the professional development of women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almquist, E. M., & Angrist, S. S. Role model influences on college women's career aspirations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1971, 17, 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. Role models in young adulthood: Their relationship to occupational behaviors. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 1970, 18, 280–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. Fair science: Women in the scientific community. New York: Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R. Women in science. American Scientist, 1981, 69, 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E. The role of models in women's professional development. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1976, 1, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A., Gallessich, J., & Evans, S. L. Sex of faculty role models and students' self-perceptions of competency. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 597–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. Effect of same-sex and cross-sex models on the subsequent academic productivity of scholars. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. The Work and Family Orientation Questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1978, 8, 35 (Ms. No. 1677).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Short forms of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory, an objective measure of self-esteem. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974, 4, 473–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane, W. E., Lucker, G. W., & Matthews, K. A. Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 896–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, T. D. Reference groups, socialization, and achievement. American Sociological Review, 1968, 33, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, C. Sex discrimination persists in academe. Science, 1981, 214, 890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Deaux, K. Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 1985 (in press).

  • Speizer, J. J. Role models, mentors, and sponsors: The elusive concepts. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1981, 6, 692–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidball, M. E. Of men and research: The dominant themes in American higher education include neither teaching nor women. Journal of Higher Education, 1976, 47, 373–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidball, M. E. Perspective on academic women and affirmative action. Educational Record, 1973, 54, 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldman, D. J. CDC 6600 computer programs for statistical analysis. Austin, TX: Ibid, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. Scientific elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, L.A. Dimensions of same-gender student-faculty role-model relationships. Sex Roles 12, 111–123 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288041

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288041

Keywords

Navigation