Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of evaluatee's sex on evaluations of a response on a managerial selection instrument

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study 33 male and 22 female undergraduate students were trained and then asked to evaluate an in-basket response (with either a male or female respondent) on four dimensions: sensitivity, organizing and planning, decision-making, and written communications. Results indicated that the evaluatee's sex did not influence evaluations of the in-basket response. Female in comparison to male evaluators were significantly harsher in evaluating written communications. The absence of sex discrimination which sharply differed from the findings of several previous research studies is discussed in terms of the substantial amount of managerial related data provided by the in-basket technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bray, D. W. The Assessment Center: Opportunities for women. Personnel, September–October, 1971, 48, 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecil, E. A., Paul, R. B., & Olins, R. A. Perceived importance of selected variables used to evaluate male and female job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 1973, 26, 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P. Are some women prejudiced against women? Transaction, April 1968, pp. 28–30.

  • Jaffee, C. L. Problems in supervision: An in-basket exercise. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, M. J. A positive approach to women in management. Personnel Journal, 1972, 51, 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pheterson, G., Kiesler, S., & Goldberg, P. Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement and personal history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 114–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. The influence of sex role stereotypes on evaluations of male and female supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. Influence of sex-role stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 58, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. Differential impact of negative stereotypes in employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 1972, 25, 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This report is based on a master's thesis written by the second author under the sponsorship of the first author and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MA degree at Florida Technological University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank, F.D., Drucker, J. The influence of evaluatee's sex on evaluations of a response on a managerial selection instrument. Sex Roles 3, 59–64 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289690

Keywords

Navigation