Skip to main content
Log in

A theoretical analysis of sex differences in same-sex friendships

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An investigation of sex differences in same-sex friendships was conducted in terms of the intersection and social penetration model of relationship development, and Bem's theory of sex role orientation. The results indicated that there were significant sex differences in the nature of the same-sex friendships studied. In the terminology of Levinger's (“Toward the Analysis of Close Relationships,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1980, 16, 510–544) intersection model, female same-sex friendships indicated greater involvement. In the terminology of Altman and Taylor's (Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973) social penetration model, female friendships demonstrated greater depth. Overall, the female friendships were of longer duration than those of the males. The differences in involvement and depth were found within each designated level of friendship (causal, good, and close). However, the difference in involvement was moderated by the sex role orientation of the participants, in that the sex difference was greater between sex-typed individuals than between androgynous individuals. An examination of questionnaire subscale intercorrelations indicated that females tended to seek friends to whom they could relate in many different areas, while males tended to develop different relationships to meet different needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehard & Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, E. J., & Johnson, F. L. Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 1183–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. R. Friendships of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 402–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. The assessment of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, H., & Angelis, V. B. Sex role differences in the patterning of love among college students. Psychology, 1975, 12, 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. Sex and social participation. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 721–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozby, P. C. Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L. R., & Duberman, L. Friendship: Communication and interaction pattern in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 809–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donelson, E., & Gullahorn, J. E. Women: A psychological perspective. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L. An introduction to linear regression and correlation, 2nd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlis, G. F., & Lu, E. Judgment of counseling process: Reliability, agreement, and error. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 78, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980, 16, 510–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham, W. D., & Tinsley, H. E. What are friends for? Students' expectations of the friendship encounter. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1980, 27, 524–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhauzer, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 996–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rands, M., & Levinger, G. Implicit theories of relationship: An intergenerational study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 645–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, A., Gross, R., Erdwins, C., & Gessner, T. Social attitude correlates of sex role. Journal of Psychology, 1979, 101, 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 1984, 13, 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, J., Fuehrer, A., & Childs, L. Gender differences in self-disclosure to various target persons. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1980, 27, 192–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, L. Men in groups. New York: Vintage, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L., & Lowenthal, M. F. Four stages of life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. G. Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 587–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. Men's friendships, women's friendships, and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barth, R.J., Kinder, B.N. A theoretical analysis of sex differences in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles 19, 349–363 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289842

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289842

Keywords

Navigation